That's not exactly the truth as I see I, but merely a shorter exaggeration for the sake of a title. What I think, based on a lifetime's worth of observation, that belief has a detrimental affect on one's ability to think and make decisions. Belief requires one to ignore any counter-arguements in a specific area and, instead of laughter as a reaction to silly actions or proposals, substitute abject obedience to a set of 'beliefs.'
Belief, like any disease, thrives on an environment with little natural resistance. The smaller amount of cognitive ability one starts with the greater the effect of belief and the larger the possibility that belief will grow to take over, form its own complex structure and become a 'philosophy' or a way of life.
I was formerly a scientist and so the ferreting out of cause and effect relationships is mother's milk to me. In this case, we can't run a double-blind test but we can look at the correlations around us.
Religion is a fine place to start. Look at the amazing number of observably silly things that religious people believe - without naming any - and look at the effort that people must exert to avoid a realistic look at any situation. "A nice God." "Look around you. Does the world seem nice?" "Oh,he has his reasons and we can't know them."
In an interview, an NGO worker who was saved after 5 days under rubble in Haiti, said that she believed that an angel was watching over her. She and two others were taken out alive and two others died in this same building collapse - and she ignored the death next to her and the immense amount of agony and torture around her to claim that her belief was what brought her through.
Is it too frightening for any individual to accept that life is a collossal series of random accidents and coincidence and that any living being exists by luck - and not by any divine intervention? Well, it must be!
Look at the numbers of people who, as lone survivors in a sea of calamity, profess their belief in a god and how he, never she, is on their side. I guess they also believe that god must watch sports and take sides.
Politics is another fertile field for observation but the amount of hypocrisy there really confuses observations. It is difficult to separate true belief from skillfully practiced abject self interest.
But that wasn't what incited me to write this. I read a lot of the Mid-East discussions and I am truly amazed at the decided lack of thought and excess of 'belief' exhibited there. Rarely are there discussions; rather one side will state a belief and the 'other' side will begin spouting off their beliefs, using a recent and available fact as justification, but ignoring any more of the facts of history.
The one thing that a scientist can get from looking around him or herself is that we, the world, would be a lot better if belief wasn't part of our cognitive set.
As always, I will end with a picture. This young man in Philadelphia took taking his picture rather seriously.
Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Salon.com
Comments
Be prepared to let go of your beliefs, as they may only serve to hinder you.
In the time following that, I looked at the "blockages" in my life, and examined where my "beliefs" about the situation could be causing it. this little exercise freed me up from trying to go down a path I believed was correct, and led me instead to my private practice. When I needed more work recently, I reexamined my "beliefs" about the situation, and let go of some, and the block to gainful employment disappeared.
That isn't political, but it is personal, and economic, and thus will shape some of my politics moving forward. Spiritual.. well, it's always part of the mix. Can't remove the yin from that yang.
I have no idea what was before there was something but I think a more pertinent question is why, in the absence of definable answers to cosmic uncertainties, must people fill in the space with some sort of godhead? I prefer to rely on ideals that the only reality that I can know has developed.
Once people get set on belief as the answer to unknowns, it is much easier to depend on whim, bias or external standards for answers than to sort out the best, fairest way to behave.
Otherwise, @Libmomrn "Religion is the opiate of the people" is probably one of the most misunderstood quotes by Marx. It is easier to leap to the thought that Marx was asserting a dislike for religion, but there's no reason to think that he might have been referring to the numbing effect it can have in times of pain.
@Richard Jorgensen Why do you assume that there was a "before" with nothingness? Perhaps there was always "something", just not in the form that we know it now. There have been many studies in physics over the years about the relatively permanent nature of energy. Einstein leaps to mind, of course. And then there are the theories on the nature of time - is it really linear as we perceive it? If not, the concept of "before" anything is meaningless. Yes, I'm acknowledging the limitations of human understanding, and pointing out that there was a time when man gave names to all that he didn't understand in this world. We know those names now as the pantheons of gods and goddesses from ancient times. Are we any different now? I don't think so. God fills the gaps where our understanding of our world ends.
Ashes to ashes, we are cosmic dust, this is indisputable. I am so "blessed" that we now live in a world of quantum understanding where, while no one is sure, we can begin to perceive a multiverse with our "night vision" through space via wavelength frequency and the concept of Bubble Theory, that the speed of the Big Bang is easily explained if thought of with the analogy of a large, quickly blown soap bubble as a visual- yes, they both burst- with some warp of space time as its origination- makes perfect sense but who knows? We do now there are parallel dimensions- what is Heaven?
My family Gods tell us Maui pulled the Islands from the Sea by lassoing the Sun, which is a great creation story for any volcano.
IMUA