I was entranced by an article in Salon by Justin Elliot on Friday, 13 May about Dr Terry Lakin, the Army doctor who refused deployment overseas because he believed that Barack Obama is not eligible to be the President and thus could not initiate his deployment orders.
All of the 'birther' arguments aside, I just couldn't understand the mind set of a seasoned Army Officer, not to mention a physician, taking this kind of career-ending, life-shaking stand. I spent 24 years in the military as an officer and I worked day to day with every kind of military doctor. As individuals they run the same political/personality gamut as civilian doctors, with the two exceptions that the extraordinary overtly flaming liberal is pretty rare in the military and the more conservative committed segment is greater. Because of the US military involvement, overseas assignments, separation from family are routine and, to some degree, every military doc buys into the 'Duty, Honor, Country' triad. For doctors, I think the third part of that is not 'Country' so much as it is duty of care.
So when I read on the web site of the Terry Lakin Action Fund that Terry was returning to Baltimore Washington Airport, not ten miles from my house, I was drawn to go. According to the web site, supporters had arranged with the airport for a demonstration area and there was a statement that they wanted, expected hundreds of people to greet Terry. Again, according to the site, Terry had spent hundreds of thousands of his own money on the defense lawyers and needed help and support; it was only from Maureen Dowd's account of the court martial in the NY Times, that I learned that at least part of his defense had been underwritten by the birthers.
And an obvious tilt towards the 'birther' conviction is what characterized the group I found down in the baggage area at the airport. A smaller group than I had expected, perhaps fifty people, casually penned in an area in the baggage claim area, watched carefully by three policeman and an airport employee.
Many of the people carried home-made signs – as suggested by the web site; many also wore something red white and blue. These were clearly people who wanted to be seen as lovers of the US. The words 'God' and 'Constitution' were the most popular text bites on the signs. One woman waved an large enlargement of a popularly circulated Kenyan birth certificate that purported to prove that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Mombassa, Kenya.

One woman wearing a Terry Lakin Action Fund Staff shirt said that she wasn't paid but worked on the effort a lot. When asked what they hoped would happen next with Terry and she said they were hoping for his reinstatement and return to duty. I said, “An Army officer refuses a direct order from a superior to deploy to a battle zone, gets court martialed and kicked out. Do you really think there is a chance of reinstatement?” She gave me a rueful smile and turned away.
Wandering back and forth, I took pictures, said hello, just looked around. When people saw my camera, they set themselves and smiled, ready to be photographed in this, in their eyes, meaningful event. There was no obvious denoted leader but one tall attractive woman was making statements to camera phones and moving around purposefully. When she turned my way, perhaps attracted by my camera, I asked her about the 'birther' posters. “That's what this is all about, isn't it?”, she responded. She went on to talk about how Terry was standing up for what he believed and that he was denied discovery.
I asked how she felt now that virtually everyone, including the Republican office holders in Hawaii, verified that Obama was indeed born there. She said that she had spoken to Obama's sister who said that he was adopted and that last week, a US congressman had hugged her and told her to keep on. And what about the long form released by Obama? A clear fake, she replied. Well, wouldn't he have the facilities to make a good fake. Well maybe he was doing it on his own? She seemed deeply committed to the belief that Obama was not suitable, no matter what disruptive facts came along.
She left, possibly drawn by more urgent issues and I started circling the crowd again. At the periphery of the crowd stood a woman, holding one child and flaked by two others; she was obviously physically distinct from the others in the welcome group. She was quite small, very lovely and rather dark-skinned, Asian, perhaps a Filipina. She was quiet and seemed tired. I realized with a start that this was probably Mrs Lakin, Terry's wife. Occasionally some one or two of the Terry Lakin Action Fund Staffers would go over and talk for a while, but she and the children were, both euphemistically and actually at the periphery of the crowd.
She stayed there, not attempting to do more until the same tall woman who had been giving the statements, swooped over and, evidently having gotten an alert that Terry was disembarking, ushered the family to the mouth of the arrivals gate.
For a few minutes there was nothing and then he was there. Weaned on television and movies where important events occur against a background of music and appropriate lighting, somehow I expected something more. He looked exactly like his pictures, medium-height, trim, grey hair cut short; easily seen as a military doctor, except now of course he was not, could not, wear a uniform. He walked forward and embraced his family, first together, then individually – rather than exuberance, it was the quiet happiness of a man who loved and missed his wife and children. Both he and they were clearly tired, certainly worn by the 5 months that had separated them and the trial that preceded that.
He was ushered towards the waiting crowd where people took pictures and asked for his autograph, one man holding open a book entitled 'Where is the Birth Certificate.' Terry Lakin answered a few questions so quietly that his voice could not be heard at the rear of the small crowd. He didn't make any statement and the exuberance of the expectant crowd drained away into the sort of flat reality that this was not the beginning of something but the unwelcome end.

In a very few minutes, he and his family were lead outside to a waiting car which drove off, led by a small contingent from a Christian motorcycle club. As she was leaving, I stopped the spokesperson and asked her what Terry would be doing now. She said that he might open a clinic and that the fund would help him if they could. Donations had dropped off since Obama had released his birth certificate. I asked if he is licensed to practice medicine in Maryland? 'Oh, I wouldn't know anything about that', she said and was gone.
As they drove away, I remembered something from Maureen Dowd's column. During the court martial, LTC Lakin said
“the winter had been “a confusing time, a very emotional time for me.” His shoulders slumped, he offered excuses about how he had gotten conflicting advice from lawyers — his defense was underwritten by Birthers. 'I understand that it was my decision, and I made the wrong choice,' he told the judge.”
A press release on the TLAF website released on April 27th said, in part,
Had the Obama administration agreed to allow the document unveiled today and other related documents as requested for discovery in Terry Lakin's first pre-trial hearing, the matter would have been resolved and soldiers assured their military orders were lawful, given by a lawful Commander-in-Chief.
A good soldier, having played his part in this issue, would have returned enthusiastically to the service for which he is so ably trained.
The ultimate act of bravery in wartime is to sacrifice yourself to save your comrades. So clear is one act, throwing oneself on a grenade, that it has become the single predominant cliché used to describe a knowingly total self-sacrificing act.
Did Terry Lakin, chose his brave act, throw himself on a grenade, only to look up and find that he was the only one who was ever at risk and nothing was ever in danger?

I have written to Terry asking to talk with him and have received a message that that it is being considered.


Salon.com
Comments
I don't dismiss whatever motives he had but I can see him as a person who is willing to act on his convictions and sacrifice for them - to put his own hand in the fire and not just write about it anonymously on some web site. However wrong or wrongheaded, I have some respect for that.
Well done; I hope Dr. Lakin sees this balanced piece and is open to an interview with you.
What is the duty of a military man if he thinks he is given an unlawful order? Should he not do what the doctor did and challenge it? He has served overseas before and if handed a single sheet of paper would have gone again.
Or, should he just be the "good soldier" and just follow orders like he is told. Maybe he should lead his men into a small village in Vietnam and kill everything.
I know what I hope I would have the guts to do, but them again I only did 8 years and was enlisted.
Finally, we all know what we think we would do. I give the doctor his due for doing what is right. We all say we will fall on the grenade to save our squad, but until it rolls into our path, we really don't know.
What is it about 'duty of care' of care that you find disturbing? The patients may not be 'wounded' but just have the same kind of illness that any family doc sees.
In the second place, I find this sad and absolutely incomprehensible. How can anyone smart enough to get the intials "M.D." after his name have fallen for this birther nonsense? There are some things about Obama I like and some things I don't, but how anyone can fall for this nonsense is beyond me.
"Such "conviction" in the face of so much overwhelming evidence should not be seen, as it is by some, as virtuous, but as mental illness."
This comment is too glib and unproductive, being easily used against any one of the billions of people who believe in a supreme being or who chose to stay married to someone you think is a terribly destructive, conniving POS or who, in general believe something that you do not.
One hesitates to think him a racist, given his wife's obvious ethnicity. I am so curious to learn the reason for this man's fervent belief. Great post, traveler.
Lezlie
"What is the duty of a military man if he thinks he is given an unlawful order? Should he not do what the doctor did and challenge it? He has served overseas before and if handed a single sheet of paper would have gone again.
Or, should he just be the "good soldier" and just follow orders like he is told. Maybe he should lead his men into a small village in Vietnam and kill everything."
I can't speak for Dr Lakin but disregarding a lawful order given by a superior is a violation of Section 92 of the UCMJ.
Lawful orders are those that are 1) given by a superior officer,2) must pertain to your military duty and 3) must not require you to break a law.
Your second comment about 'good soldiers' is a snide, unworthy jab and does not deserve a reply.
First, thanks.
For me this is just the latest in a life long string of surprises that people whom I think should have certain attitudes and opinions have the opposite - and for equally not understandable reasons. Physicians as a group get the benefit of the doubt because of their achievement to get in and get through a difficult course of study and their commitment to taking care of people. I am always stunned when one doesn't agree with me.
Agreed. This is, I hope, an opportunity for me to learn a little bit about the connections between personal conviction and a driven public movement.
I have spoken with the trustee of the Terry Lakin Action Fund and had a fairly good and forthright discussion about what could possibly happen.
I'm looking forward to whatever happens and hope to write about the results.
Lew
Sorry to have missed you before in previous responses.
Thanks for your comments and I will post whatever the follow-up if any.
Lakin chose to disobey an order under a false pretense- that he had the right to demand that the president prove to him that he was a citizen. For the willfully ignorant, no amount of proof will ever suffice. He's no hero and those that make him one are beneath contempt.
You can compare the two oaths here:
http://www.history.army.mil/html/faq/oaths.html
Interestingly, one of the sources that explores this issue is Marjorie Cohn a professor of law at Thomas Jefferson School of Law and past president of the National Lawyers Guild in her book "Rules of Disengagement: The Politics and Honor of Military Dissent." The book was written as a condemnation of the Bush wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Here's an example of the officer oath, note that the National Guard has an additional element to swear allegiance to their respective governor:
http://books.google.com.ph/books?id=SdmaFv1rlY4C&pg=PA99#v=onepage&q&f=false
So, it comes down to this officer believing that the orders of the Commander in Chief, through the offices and instructions of his military superiors, were invalidated by his belief that the President was not a natural-born citizen (which term is in the Constitution, but has never been clearly defined). He chose his own path, and in doing so subjected himself to the review of military justice in his court martial. What his supporters, including those depicted above, probably are not all that aware of, or perhaps choose to ignore, is that Lt Col Lakin wept at his sentencing, saying that he had made a grave mistake, and would do anything to resume his military career and would get on the next plane to Afghanistan, and that he relied on information that he then (at his sentencing) believed to be erroneous. The result? Six months confinement at Leavenworth, a dishonorable discharge, stripped of military benefits and pensions...and for what? Because some birthers were strident screamers? And he believed them? He chose his path, now he has to walk it. I think it's a sad testament to think that an otherwise intelligent person with what looks like a nice family would choose to ruin his career in this way. There's something here too, that in my mind, doesn't make sense, like there's something missing. I hope you get that interview and can parse what that missing element is, if it's there.
I enjoyed reading this, and saddened at the same time. People are stupid at times.
My comment was made within the specific context of this story, and for you to extrapolate beyond that is on you, not me.
Lezlie, I hate to tell you - tho I suspect you already know, far better than I - that there are white people who think Chinese (or Chinese type) people are okay, but black people ain't. (And/or he may be one of those assholes who got himself a nice 'submissive' oriental wife as opposed to western bitches.)
Supposing that you knew someone who, against all your concepts of rational thought, takes his very expensive yacht out into the teeth of a great storm. He is caught up in the storm and, although the boat is lost, manages to survive. The issues of why he did what he did are arguable; what is not arguable is that he had an amazing, almost unique experience and I would like to hear about that experience.
"If I were in the vicinity and had the guts I would have been at the airport with a sign reading IDIOT.
Lezlie, I hate to tell you - tho I suspect you already know, far better than I - that there are white people who think Chinese (or Chinese type) people are okay, but black people ain't. (And/or he may be one of those assholes who got himself a nice 'submissive' oriental wife as opposed to western bitches.)"
The first thing that popped up in my mind when I read this comment was the behavior of the Westboro Baptist Church. Perhaps there is a liberal wing?
That's a great sentence. Well-written piece with an even-handed tone, but it make me sad when I see supposedly intelligent people so blinded by misinformation that they dive headfirst into ill-conceived actions.
Sarah Palin and Troopergate. She claimed that she had been cleared of all wrongdoing, even though the official report stated that " . . . Governor Sarah Palin Abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act ... Compliance with the code of ethics is not optional..."
Swift Boat Veterans. They claimed that John Kerry did not earn the medals that had been awarded to him. They were contradicted by numerous after-action reports, fitness reports, and official citations for medals awarded to Kerry and others who were present at the same events. Some of the Swift Boat Veteran claims even contradicted statements that their own members had made years earlier. Even after their accusations were disproved they continued to assert them. (What does that remind you of?)
The Terry Schiavo Case. Conservatives repeated an entire flood of lies concerning the case. Virtually everything they claimed was contradicted by official records including court documents and testimony under oath, medical records, and the findings of guardian ad litem Jay Wolfson's report to the governor of Florida.
Come now the "birthers," with their own falsehoods.
the traveler writes: "I don't dismiss whatever motives he had but I can see him as a person who is willing to act on his convictions and sacrifice for them - to put his own hand in the fire and not just write about it anonymously on some web site. However wrong or wrongheaded, I have some respect for that."
The contempt for official records shown by conservatives is a political technique designed to undermine their opponents through lies and falsehoods, and we should have the same respect for them that we have for any other crook or con man.
The fellow in question was duped and suckered into throwing his career away, and I have the same "respect" for him that I have for people who lose their life savings after buying into these Nigerian email scams, which is to say none. I feel sorry for him, sure. But that's about it.
Also, it's rather odd seeing so many so called progressives rush to dismiss the right of this man, of anyone, to refuse deployment in the military. What difference should it make what the reason was? What a real old fashioned pacifist would have said was: "That's despicable that he goes along with those who try to invalidate Obama's presidency on some trumped up nonsense about his birth. Now, let's talk about concientious objection...and all the many people who have refused to serve during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts..."
But of course, you'd never hear that argument by the present crop of dunderheads. They can't see an opportunity when it's right in front of them. And they haven't the knowledge of the many hundreds of people who have refused to serve in these TRUMPED UP CONFLICTS to make the relevant point.
Creepily, what you end up with is the spectacle of this man, with his rightwing reasoning, taking the place of all those others. Nice job, "progressives."
Rated
I hope this guy can practice medicine or something. Birthers want to make him out as the victim of Obama, but he's the victim of right-wing hysteria. He's ruined while pinheads like Trump walk away acting like they won.
I'd like to put a different twist on your analogy. Let's say that you know someone who takes a very expensive yacht into the ocean. He sees from his maps that there is a reef dead ahead. In fact, every map he's ever seen, including maps published by the U.S. government, shows that reef in the same place. But his friends have told him that liberals have put fake reefs on maps in order to inconvenience boaters, and that the reef in question doesn't actually exist. So he runs into the reef, rips the bottom out of the boat, and ends up in the water.
I think the only part of that experience I would be interested in would be if perhaps he had a newfound respect for maps.
Dr. Lt. Col. Lakin is an amazing man with the absolute courage of his convictions. This is indeed, a very rare quality.
I do know that the Michelle Obama always referred to Kenya as "Barack's homeland." Which always suggested to me, that he was born in Kenya.
I also know that the Presidents's Kenyan Grandmother still states that he was born in Kenya. Since she and the President are the only two people, in the room at the time of his birth; who are still alive, one of them is lying. I'm with his Grandmother on this one.
As far as an analogy, for Dr. Lakin falling on the granade to save who? I believe that his intention, was to fall on the grenade, to protect our constitution from subversion. A very noble cause.
Hopefully, Dr. Lakin will do a follow-up interview with you.
I appreciate your effort to register and then comment on this post and I also hope I get to talk with Dr. Terry Lakin.
This post is not intended to be a venue to discuss President Obama's birthplace - and won't be - but I do refer you to this link http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2009/07/23/liddy where the full, unedited video is available and where it is clear exactly what President Obama's grandmother said.
Correction
Sorry, I made the incorrect assumption that you registered to comment.
Lew
Dr. Lakin is hardly a victim, here. He made choices to become a military physician. He made choices to defy a legal order under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and he paid the price for his decisions.
"Don't do the crime if you can't do the time" has been written on the stall of many a courtroom restroom.
I thought this was covered with respect and appropriate detachment. Thanks for sharing this here.
Oh, I see, said the blind man. This is the venue to respond to troopergate, swift boat veterans and the Terry Shiavo case; but not the Presiden't birthplace. LOL
"@ the traveler
Oh, I see, said the blind man. This is the venue to respond to troopergate, swift boat veterans and the Terry Shiavo case; but not the Presiden't birthplace. LOL"
If you want to start a discussion about the birther issues, feel free, but somewhere else. This thread is about Dr. Lakin's homecoming and I don't want it being led astray into issues that are peripheral to the article.
My article, my rules.
Got it?
Whatever the status of Dr. Lakin in anyone else's eyes, until I have reason to know otherwise, I will continue to feel some sadness for a man who sowed a wind and reaped the whirlwind. Besides the effect on him, there is the impact on his family and I do feel some compassion for him for the tough road he chose.
Thanks
@shadow8
"Interesting phrase, courage of his convictions. At what point does respect for someone's courageous conviction become disgust at their abhorrent behavior?"
Yet again another phrase, posed as a question, meant, not to contribute to a discussion, but to smugly close it off as if the speaker had the received knowledge.
In this case, the 'someone's' behavior hurt himself at the expense of no one but his family. Not significantly different than the monk who immolated himself in Saigon to show his own commitment to his beliefs. In case you do not remember that, a Mahayana Buddhist monk dowsed himself with gasoline and set himself alight to protest the actions of the South Vietnamese government, at the time led by the violently Catholic Diem regime. Perhaps not understandable to we modern people who often find beliefs as easy to shed in uncomfortable circumstances as coats in summer heat.
This is, obviously, nothing less than an attempt to de-legitimize Obama’s presidency by de-legitimizing his citizenship, both thinly veiled attempt to diminish his basic humanity. This is no different than what the Nazis did to the Jews and what conservatives do to homosexuals. Think Matthew Shepard.
I’m quite familiar with self immolating monks, and Norman Morrison, and for you to compare what they did (and their intentions) to this (pardon my colloquialism) nutjob is an insult to them, and frankly, human intelligence.
If you think this hurts no one other than himself and his family you somehow managed to miss the people at the airport holding signs of support (a glaring omission on your part considering you took the pictures). You’ve apparently also missed the recent publication of the book asking where Obama’s birth certificate is and the fact that a publisher was willing to commit considerable resources because they know there’s a large audience for this material. And maybe you missed the rallies last summer where people with loaded weapons were holding up signs asking the same question.
Maybe your beliefs are easily shed, but mine are the result of a lifetime considering people’s actions, positions and intentions and the possible results (no cheap metaphors necessary).
Your vehement defense of your post is due, I’ve little doubt, to your inability to see beyond your own point of view and an obvious sympathy for the man and his position. The former allows you to believe that you’re somehow a man of great integrity. The second is just pathetic.
You really seem to need to attack me as a person rather than just add your opinions. 'Smug, naive, delusional.'
You might also add 'tolerant' because your comments, even though they don't add anything beyond what is already known, are still here.
As far as I can see there are no more points raised to be dealt with. As far as I am concerned the birther questions are settled; it is well known that believers are not converted by facts and I experienced that when talking to them.
The issue of interest for me is how Terry Lakin gets on with his life. What irritates me is those who want to go on and on and on about how wrong he was and how stupid he was and how delusional he was.
What more do you want from the guy?
Shadow, take a pill - and then send some to me, PLEEZ!