Occupy DC -McPherson Square & Park Police - a photo essay
McPherson Square in Washington, DC is where Occupy DC has been for months, protesting and camping. In view of the circumstances, the Park Police have seemingly been laid back against the enforcement of the no sleeping or camping regulations but, pushed by all sort of political and civic pressures, this was the weekend was when they moved in.
Long time Occupy DC protesters told me that in the last several days, perhaps in anticipation of the Park Police activity, their ranks had swelled but, unfortunately not always for the better. According to one woman, the new people were responsible for a lot of the night-time noise, drinking and drug use that has exacerbated the situation.
The police were there in overwhelming force and they behaved civilly and, except for one flurry where some young men tried to grab and push a section of barricade, everything went, if not happily, then smoothly.
Because of the limitations of displaying images on OS, I encourage viewers to go to see the slideshow full screen by holding down the Control key and clicking on http://lewlortonphoto.com/p408377446/slideshow. (OS won't allow me to code that automatically).



















Salon.com
Comments
And, of course, no one wants the horses to get hurt.
"A city with a large black populace which didn't come out en masse to support this movement."
Occupy may say they are the 99% but the demographics of the people I saw belie that claim.
@Erica
"Police on horses--reminds me of wartime."
Lots of polices and horses here in DC because of all the parks and the crowds. Horses manage crowds amazingly well.
@Alysa,
"Here in France, we hear so little about Occupy these days that I thought all of the sites had been cleared by the police. I'm glad to see that people are still holding strong - though it's not easy."
The fact that you hear little is indicative of the impact that Occupy has made on a day-to-day basis. The police generally ignore them unless the situation is just too provocative. IMO, the Occupy movements have squandered their chances and the lack of planning has betrayed a lot of people.
Thanks all for the comments.
Lew
--You-Know-Who
rate
I know that's a Bob Dylan line but, in this case, excessive subtlety has defeated itself and I have no idea what your comment meant.
But thanks for the R
Lew
~nod~ Hell no!!
Can replace both sides(the Occupiers and the Police) easily but horses, hard to find a really good one!
:D
Rated.
A spooked horse is uncontrollable in a crowd and people would get hurt and the entire issue of crowd control would be lost.
But thank you for your comment, being written I'm certain, on a wind-powered computer from your place in an Occupy site.
Lew
But I do have a pedal bike with a little hamster peddling away when I'm out in the field, which is never, so...:D
(But seriously, yes, it's like Hannibal and the Elephants, if you seen these huge elephants marching towards you, you'd be frightened too!! The biggest part of war/intimidation is the theatrics, the club to shield, the noise, the flair, etc. etc. Shock and Awe for lack of a better term....better for a protestor to be shocked, then shot! ~nod~ And as you said, horses, well trained for such situations, are much better for crowd control than dogs(which have a tendency to bite which makes for bad public relations --- also another consideration! Sheesh, these protests, both sides, too much like acting classes!! And of course both sides have their loose cannons, for lack of a better term...so be careful out there!)
I have to ask, though, besides you feeling the Occupy folks have squandered their opportunity, where do you stand on the issues?
It seems from some of your responses that you are attempting to "stand to the side," neither actively for nor against. I'm not anything but curious in this regard.
Your photos are most excellent.
--r--
My opinion of the Occupy Movement is that it completely lost its focus, they refused to understand that identifying a problem isn't enough, actual, workable solutions must be proposed to point to a direction.
Lastly the Movement let ego stand in the way of moving towards a solution.
Rather than dressing and acting like the vanguard of the 99% and showing an outward face that everyone could agree with, they dressed and acted like the counter-culture revolutionaries every conservative was anxious to paint them as.
OK, so everyone got to play a latter day Che and dress the part but the DC Occupy, which should have been the most powerful in the country, is an irritant and essentially not even irrelevant but unnoticed.
I remember hearing a speaker, talking to an audience of maybe fifteen people, telling the people listening that 'Washington is afraid of us.'
Afraid?
Not afraid.
Oblivious, maybe. But not afraid.
I wonder what the story is of the man with gray hair, the red moustache and the blue eyes?
That was a neat trick for the slide show. R
"Great photos. Every picture tells a story ... "
Thanks,
@Rodney Roe
"That was a neat trick for the slide show. "
No trick, just normal web site stuff - and thanks.
Lew
"As transitions are made post-eviction, it forces us the movement to do community outreach in the neighborhoods and championing local 99% struggles and connecting them to the bigger picture, including housing for the homeless evicted from encampments."
So the 'Movement' has diverted from making a major change in the economic infrastructure of this country to finding housing for those homeless who were evicted from McPherson Square.
As I read about it, each 'Occupy', instead of being part of some grand national plan, now is focusing on a problem whose solutions they can see.
Can't you see how problems only get solved when there are solutions proposed and discussed and found?
And by not doing the hard work of finding and proposing some solution for the large problem that's damn easy to identify, Occupy just did the easy part and punked out on the heavy lifting.
In DC, those homeless have been housed many times and as many others just return to the streets for whatever unfathomable reason.
Occupy DC isn't really doing anything, they're just doing busy work to make themselves feel good.
Lew
I am quite sensitive to the censorship issue but, on the other hand, I don't like threads being hijacked.
He closed with a link to an article he wrote, which seems to be about fixing the Republicans.
Here is the link.
http://open.salon.com/blog/vzn/2012/01/23/gamechanger--_occupying_republicans
♥
It was interesting to be there. I talked at some length to several of the residents (sic?) and developed an interesting, to me at least, theory about the different categories of people there.
Lew
Thanks for that comment. I try to be thankful and cordial without sacrificing my firmly held points of view.
Lew
The photo with the masked horse and rider; arresting, the thought of the training it takes to get that even on a horse brings me to the photos of the brigade down the street; stirring. The photos of the occupiers themselves, sad, broken. Us. Relatable to all of us.
Congrats on the cover and EP beautiful depiction of all sides of our human condition.
"Occupy DC isn't really doing anything, they're just doing busy work to make themselves feel good."
Why would you expect them to be any different than anyone else in the US. I am not sure I can even name one person who that doesn't describe.
Great photos.
I'm sure glad some people are listening to you.
No one paid much attention to me when I said, back at the beginning of OWS, that pointing up the problem is only of value if a solution to that problem is offered as well. Hell, all of us can find problems by the truck-full with the way things are. We can easily point fingers and screech like fish-wives at those we deem 'guilty' of some error or stupidity - and there are plenty of those! We can revile those who are doing the very same thing we are - trying to make a bigger buck and to hold onto it all we want but that doesn't change one little thing.
The trick is to devise and share with everyone, SOLUTIONS to the problems. I respect those here on OS who have put forward their ideas and proposed some interesting solutions. I think most of them are little more than band-aid solutions and too many of them are of the "let's turn the clock back" sort, but bless their active little minds for at least giving it a shot. And for having the guts to put them out in public.
Occupy was a great summer party that let lots of people feel they were "doing something". Lots of hugs and pats on the back and "isn't this GREATs", but no real solid thinking behind it. Hell, for the most part, even the cops didn't get too fired up.
.
__♥$$$$$♥__LOVE__♥$$$$$$♥
_♥_F_$$$$$$$$__$$$$§§(¯`v´¯)♥
♥$$_O_$$$$$$$$$$$$$$(¯`(●)´¯)♥
♥$$$_R_$$$$$$$$$$$$$$(_.^._)$♥
♥$$$$_E_$$$$$$$$$(¯`v´¯)$$$$♥
_♥$$$$_V_$$$$$$$(¯`(●)´¯)$$♥
___♥$$$_E_$$$$$$$(_.^._)$♥
______♥$_R_$(¯`v´¯)$$$$♥
________♥$$(¯`(●)´¯)$♥
___________♥(_.^._)♥
p.s. I viewed the slideshow on the website and the additional pictures are worth looking at.
Photography is an incredibly powerful tool and I think it strikes deeper and harder and faster than words because it stirs up and links with our own old memories and the images cannot be easily expunged.
But of course they can lie equally easily because they catch a chosen moment in time and space - moment chosen by the photographer to make his or her own point.
Second to Anthony Duval, Rita Shibr and Bob Simpson who disagree with me in part that 1) Occupy DC is doing things just like everyone else does 2) Occupy DC is actually doing something and 3) Occupy is reminding us of the annoyances and Congress should act.
Let me, pretty much in concert with skypixie, say that Occupy is doing something, it's just not doing what it could have and should have. It is not this great uniting force that leads the country to change - that it could have been and that the spokespeople originally claimed it would be but who have since become rather silent.
Rather than write something, let me just quote a plangent section of text from skypixie with which I agree wholeheartedly:
“pointing up the problem is only of value if a solution to that problem is offered as well. Hell, all of us can find problems by the truck-full with the way things are. We can easily point fingers and screech like fish-wives at those we deem 'guilty' of some error or stupidity - and there are plenty of those! We can revile those who are doing the very same thing we are - trying to make a bigger buck and to hold onto it all we want but that doesn't change one little thing.”
The goals of Occupy DC and all the others have devolved into just survival and morale boosting. The encampments are left in place only if and until they aren't a sufficient annoyance to justify removing them.
I was amazed at Occupy Wall Street's reaction to being messed around by the 'authorities.' Their very actions are designed to provoke but they counted on those being provoked to react according to some set of rules – amazing. Buddhist monks self-immolate; US protesters get upset at relatively minor tussles.
An appropriate quote from Jimmy Dugan, as played by Tom Hanks, "There ain't no crying in baseball."
The Occupy Movement is the Children's Crusade of our time.
The brick throwing happened after I left, later in the day. I had been told by one of the residents that a new contingent of 'anarchists' had moved in recently. Where bricks came on the spur of the moment is up for speculation.
I heard the 4 men (about 5th from the bottom) discussin how they participated in the aborted attempt to grab the barricade. They moved when they saw me eavesdropping.
or perhaps Israeli provocateurs?
Why can't things actually be as they seem and not the fruit of a large conspiracy by your favorite betes noirs?
My guess is that the a planned provocation would have been greater and more extensive to provide the excuse for more of a crackdown.
As it was, according to all reports, the regulations on sleeping are being enforced and nothing more.
But of course one would actually have to read about those solutions and action plans and participate in those discussions.
And that is just soooooooo...much work and soooooooo...time consuming. Besides, American Idol is on.
r./
How significant this is I don't know. But it may well be that things are going on now sub rosa. It's not that the 1% has other plans for us, as Amy said - it's that they no longer have any use for us, and we will have to get together and find ways to live independent of TPTB. The old hippies and back-to-the-landers have some experience in this.
I tend to agree with you - the the OWS movement is losing its pulse. Old guy that I am, and as a student of history, there are lots of examples in our past where these kinds of intentionally formless movements - religious, social, and political, just kind of flame out precisely because there is no leadership.
Anarchists, ancient or modern, just don't get that groups tend to really behind a leader. Until OWS morphs into a true movement of people who are interested in taking back the country from the 1%, and is led by a new version of Dr. King (as an example), I'd bet this thing will just fizzle out.
The authorities know this, and except for places like Oakland, which has a long history of police riots, leaving them alone to wither on the vine is probably the best option.
“Actually the Occupy Movement has put forth all kinds of solutions ranging from support of specific legislation to massive societal changes that will takes years to accomplish. It has generated discussions about societal inequalities that would have been unthinkable just a year ago.
But of course one would actually have to read about those solutions and action plans and participate in those discussions.
And that is just soooooooo...much work and soooooooo...time consuming. Besides, American Idol is on.”
Bob, I'm not certain if your last line was meant to imply that I should be reading these proposals or not. I subscribe to as many email lists as I can and I don't get policy documents. If policy documents don't get pushed out to interested people, that's the movement's failure. If they want people to read them, they need to be out.
I did get this on Nov 24, 2011
“In a recent CNN interview, Van Jones said: “Phase two, you move from anger to answers. You move from pointing out the problem to pointing out the solutions,” Jones said. “What you’re going to see now is you have the Occupy movement at the center, that’s the beating heart.”
Wait a second. Slow down.
I thought that the occupy movement came about because our system is broken way beyond any remedy that can come at the ballot box. I asked one Occupier, who had just marched 240 miles from NYC to Washington, DC if she thought that the Occupy Movement should be an electoral force (i.e.- reform) or if it is a revolutionary force- and where VAN JONES fits in that equation.
Watch this video
Watch this video
http://acronymtv.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/is-van-jones-trying-to-co-opt-occupy/
So this email from Dennis Trainer says that the issue is beyond the ballot box!
--- and into what? Rebellion?
So this Movement, by virtue of its non-leadership style, has spokesperson who are encouraging methods more radical than the ballot box - and how is this encouragement to revolution supposed to appeal to the public?
Lew
Lew
@ onislandtime
Thank you, there's not much I can say except to excerpt you comment for emphasis
@ Myriad
“But it may well be that things are going on now sub rosa. It's not that the 1% has other plans for us, as Amy said - it's that they no longer have any use for us, and we will have to get together and find ways to live independent of TPTB. ”
I think that there is a 1% that is the Movement and it is their responsibility to make whatever percentage that is uncommitted in the center believe that getting behind this is important and that their methods are workable.
Lew
@Flylooper
“Anarchists, ancient or modern, just don't get that groups tend to rally (edit) behind a leader.
Until OWS morphs into a true movement of people who are interested in taking back the country from the 1%, and is led by a new version of Dr. King (as an example), I'd bet this thing will just fizzle out.”
Unfortunately, yes
Clearly, you've never been camping.
It is difficult enough to keep clean in an ad hoc environment, let alone, actually look well-groomed. Once the choice of action, the occupation, was made, the 'look' was inevitable.
You are drawing some silly conclusions or at least implying them; dress does not identify an anarchist. When I camp I look equally as scruffy as anyone there.
Lew
sad misfits
the chronically unemployed
the disenfranchised
the do gooders
the freeloaders
grifters communicationsexpert/master acting guru/award winning international playwright DR LARRY MYERS visited the site
he penned
"President William Henry Harrison at Occupy DC"
he s worked with post Katrina folks post Gulf Oil leak folks Venice car sleepers teen runaways
rwm playwrights lab
a folorn ever changing bunch of idealists & some deeply disturbed guys & gals
Myers a Tennessee williams protege weavesa atle of hope and concurrently Progressive politics gone bad and hopeless ness
his group's mission: service
no home no food no support system fell through cracks of system
Its Maxim Gorky's "Lower Depths" meets Tennesee Williams' "Small Craft Warnings"
Dr Larry Myers' cycle of post cyber 2012 morality mystery plays called "Occupation Preoccupation" a prequel to his book
EDWARD ALBEE: Occupy theater
dr myers worked with STRAsBERG
GROTOWSKI
THIS IS AN INFORMED ENLIGHTENED voice about this EVeR CHAnGING EVER EVOLVING PHENOMENA
DR MARIA PISCATOR
I'm not certain how to respond to this last comment, mostly because I have no idea what point you are making. Perhaps it is my failure but I think that more people can understand a comment written in simple English rather than one that is more of a linguistic experience.
Thanks in any case for reading and taking the time to comment.
Lew
The Occupy movement is intentionally leaderless, I believe because of our knowledge of the COINTEL program that basically killed off the leadership of social movements in the 60s. You can't chop the head of the snake off if you don't know what end of the larger body it occupies.
“The Occupy movement is intentionally leaderless, I believe because of our knowledge of the COINTEL program that basically killed off the leadership of social movements in the 60s. You can't chop the head of the snake off if you don't know what end of the larger body it occupies.”
That seems to me an odd and paranoia-induced rationalization. This movement sprang up quickly with many different sponsoring organizations; are you implying that there is some infiltration in all of those organizations?
This rationalization seems even more far fetched particularly when you specifically look at the makeup of those sponsoring organizations; they all have leaders.
During one of the public meetings someone said that 'We are a movement of leaders.' My guess, having some experience in group activities, is that, in a group that espoused equality of peers as a core value, that no one wanted to thrust themselves forward as a leader and, if anyone had done that, the rest of the group who wanted to be the leader, would have decried the self-promotion.
In any case, what is left is a Movement without a leader that has turned into a directionless blob. What more could infiltrators done? Are you saying that for fear of something that happened 50 years ago, this movement spontaneously adopted a strategy that led to failure?
“And one final observation about your pictures I found the juxtaposition of the majority of blacks in the pictures being part of the park police rather than the occupiers disturbing, telling, confusing, all of the above.”
I have no idea what you mean there.
Amongst the Occupiers, the younger strata seemed to have a racisl distribution one would expect, although I don't remember seeing many Asians.
Black people were slightly over-represented in the middle aged group; in my estimation some significant part of this group were homeless men from the DC area.
In regards to African Americans amongst the police, African Americans make up a good part of all police forces in this area. Some of the various police organizations require local residency for employment and this area is heavily African American.
Park Police, as a federal agency, probably don't have this restriction and their membership would draw from the entire commuting area and thus the racial demographic is different.
If you are implying that I am making some statement about blacks in my photography, the answer is that I am not.
And I have no idea what that statement might be.
Lew
I wasn't being paranoid merely trying to respond to whatever your point was.
Whatever your point is, you certainly have the right to make it.
Whether it is valid in this context can safely be left to others to decide.
Thank you for looking and commenting
Lew
"Really sir, you believe that my own observations need someone else's agreement to make them valid? Yeah that would explain a lot."
You seem to be wanting to make a point about me and I don't know what that is. Why not just say it straight out rather than insinuation?
You quote the names of three fallen men and expect that this justifies paranoia and hiding from leadership. I would respond with these names - John Lewis, Jesse Jackson and Barack Obama - and say that
leaders take the lead and movements follow them.
Actually I did photograph the DC Pride parade and the photos are at http://lewlortonphoto.com/p974322500
That part about the horses? The cops can see a lot farther from up there, too. We've had them in Times Square for I don't know how long.