Thomas Gladysz

Thomas Gladysz
Location
San Francisco, California, United States
Birthday
February 02
Title
arts journalist
Bio
I'm an author and arts journalist. I like writing about things that interest me, including old movies, contemporary literature, music, the visual arts, and popular culture. I'm also the Director of the Louise Brooks Society, an internet based archive & international fan club devoted to the legendary silent film star. My interview with the poet Allen Ginsberg on the subject of photography appeared in BEAT MEMORIES (National Gallery of Art, 2010). I also edited and wrote the introduction to the "Louise Brooks edition" of Margarete Bohme's THE DIARY OF A LOST GIRL (PandorasBox Press, 2010). I was born in Detroit, Michigan and now live in San Francisco, California.

Editor’s Pick
APRIL 21, 2011 2:34AM

Before Greg Mortenson and Three Cups of Tea

Rate: 11 Flag

Before Greg Mortenson and Three Cups of Tea, before Margaret B. Jones and Love and Consequences, before James Frey and A Million Little Pieces, and even before Clifford Irving and his Autobiography of Howard Hughes, there was Margarete Böhme and The Diary of a Lost Girl.

If you haven't heard of it, you're not alone.

tagebuchDespite its present-day obscurity, The Diary of a Lost Girl has some claim to being the Mother of all modern literary hoaxes. Like the above mentioned titles, this now little known 1905 book was a contested bestseller in its day. One contemporary scholar has called it “Perhaps the most notorious and certainly the commercially most successful autobiographical narrative of the early twentieth century.”

The Diary of a Lost Girl purportedly told the true-life story - in diary form - of a young woman named Thymian forced by both circumstance and society into a life of prostitution. The book went on to sell more than 1,200,000 copies - a remarkable number for the time. And also like the above mentioned titles, its authenticity came into question. Some thought it an outright hoax.

Today, The Diary of a Lost Girl is accepted as a work of fiction. But when it was first published, it was said to be the genuine diary of a young girl. Böhme claimed only to be its editor. As "the editor" states in her forward, she was given the manuscript and intended to rework it into a novel. But, on the advice of her publisher, she instead presented it as an authentic diary.

The book’s publication and rapid success quickly led to all manner of speculation as to its authorship - with readers, critics, and the press divided. To lend its story credence, some early editions of The Diary of a Lost Girl even depict manuscript pages said to be in Thymian’s hand.

 

manuscript pages from the diary

Both the author and her publisher, it should be noted, always maintained their account as to the origins of the diary. According to the forward of a 1988 German reissue, Böhme would forgo any claims as author as late as 1935 - a few years after the book had been finally driven out-of-print by conservative groups seeking to suppress it. Belief in its authenticity continued in some quarters for decades, even into the 1970’s.

Why Mortenson did what he did has yet to be explained. Why Jones and Frey did what they did - passing off fiction as memoir - has been revealed. The motives of Clifford Irving and J.T. LeRoy and other hoaxers have come to light. But why Böhme presented her book as genuine isn’t really known.

author Bohme picSome have suggested that the author, facing the double standard of the day,  realized the personal and professional consequences she would suffer for having published a novel about the demimonde. Böhme, it should be noted, was then a struggling writer as well as a divorced woman and a single mother. There was nothing common about her.

Others have speculated that the book's claim to be an actual diary was a literary ploy to put over its provocative subject matter. Back then it wasn't considered acceptable for a woman to write about such things. At one point, Böhme herself was accused of being a prostitute – the thinking being how else could a woman have written or even edited such a book?

Certainly, The Diary of a Lost Girl is a knowing work. The literary critic Walter Benjamin, who wrote about it, described it as something like “A complete inventory of the sexual trade.” In America, it was referenced in scholarly works on sexuality and criminal behavior.

In its 1907 review, the Manchester Guardian noted “It professes to be an authentic document, the actual diary of the woman it describes, unaltered save for the excision of some passages and the suppression of real names. There can be no doubt this is not the case. It is a careful narrative, directed toward a distinctly moral purpose. The psychology of it is arresting and unmistakably founded upon experience.”

To the attentive reader – the force of its narrative, its detailed realism, its references to other literature of prostitution, and its psychological observations all betray a literary sophistication beyond that of a teenage girl.

Admittedly, there is a whiff of melodrama about the book; a newspaper in New Zealand once called it “The saddest of modern books.” Ultimately, however, it is the book's subtle literary achievement which betrays its claim to be an authentic diary.

There have been many literary frauds and hoaxes over the years. Today, most of them have been forgotten. What makes The Diary of a Lost Girl stand out is its remarkable history, of which its contested origins are only the beginning. Dracula author Bram Stoker, for example, was said to be in favor of banning it. American novelist Henry Miller claimed it as one of his favorite books.

Within a few years of publication, The Diary of a Lost Girl had sold hundreds of thousands of copies and was translated into 14 languages. It was reviewed and discussed across Europe, and the book was said to have had some small influence on German social policy. Because of its popularity, there were even pirated versions in Poland and The Netherlands.

The book inspired a bestselling sequel (by Böhme in response to a flood of letters), a controversial stage play, a parody, lawsuits, two films, and sui generis - a score of imitators. There was also a film of the sequel, and even a French novelization of the 1929 German film made from the book. Because of it all – and in spite of it all, The Diary of a Lost Girl remained a steady seller for more than 25 years. It had a long run. The book was finally driven out-of-print in Germany at the beginning of the Nazi era.

diaryLast year, after being out-of-print in English for more than 100 years, I brought this noteworthy book back into print. I added a few dozen images (of the author, of earlier editions, of scenes from the films), and wrote an introduction detailing the book's remarkable and contested history.

Aside from it all, I also think it is a good read.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
This is fascinating! I guess it's nice to know that there really is nothing new under the sun.
I'm not familiar with Bohme but this seems to be a pattern for many.

There should also be questions about those that reported so much on Mortenson without doing much if any investigation. This should have been easy to check on. I have a feeling there will be more disclosed on this subject.
I thought maybe you were gonna say The Old Testament.
Please don't throw the baby out with the bath water. Your comparison of Greg Mortenson to Clifford Irvine is neither fair nor accurate, for your readers who are not familiar with that true hoax:

Irving contacted his publisher, McGraw-Hill, and claimed that he had corresponded with Hughes because of his book about de Hory and that Hughes had expressed interest in letting him write his autobiography. The McGraw-Hill editors invited him to New York, where he showed them three forged letters, one of which claimed that Hughes wished to have his biography written but that he wanted the project to remain secret for the time being. The autobiography would be based on interviews Hughes was willing to do with Irving. The result?

Hughes denounced him and sued the publisher, Irving confessed the hoax and was subsequently sentenced to two-and-a-half years in prison, serving 17 months.

Are you implying Mortenson made it all up, in the same cloak and dagger atmophere of the Hughes unauthorized biography? Mortenson wrote about his own life and events as he remember it.

As a writer, can I ask you: Do you have all the journals you ever wrote over the past 20 odd years? Did you record every move you made and every dollar you spenpt and keep these journals in a safe place? If you had to reconstruct your life over the last 20 years, how many mistake might you make? Would they be deliberate mistakes, or would the passage of time emphasize some events over others?

As with Irving, Krakauer is begging a lawsuit. Let me ask you this, why didn't Krakauer's publishers Random House or Double Day print Three Cups of Deciept? Because their legal department would never have allowed their reputation to fly on Pakistani and Afghan sources who can not be subpoenaed and cross-examined in a U.S. courtroom. As far as taped interviews, well, ask Mel Gibson his opionion about being taped.

But Krakauer can be cross-examined, and that may be the only way to blast him out of his bunker in Boulder, Colorado.