This is a poem in response to this one. it is highly suggested that you read the other first as this one copies it's tone, it's form and structure and adapts many of the original lines. Not to mention that without the original poem as context I will probably sound like an asshole.
When he looks at you
like
he just
can't
listen
to any more
criticism
Be Silent
When he asks you
Why
you
can't just
have a relationship without
talking about it in this way
all the time
Why
you can't talk without
listing
everything you
have decided is wrong
about him
Why
you can't listen
to a list of your own faults
as easily as you can list his
Be Silent.
Listen
not to your own mouth
telling him
how
right you are
but to his silence telling you
that you are so easily
Hurt by just one word
that
at this height
it
could kill you
therefore maybe
silence and consideration
are the wiser choice.
Be Silent.
Think that through
send it in a missive to your heart
I'll tell
you
my good women
learn that language
can sometimes be best when
used
judiciously.
What women don't
know
they can't learn while talking.
I wasn't looking to piss anyone off here but I have been wanting for a long time to blog about the whole men/women communication thing, women and criticism, the trend toward bashing men for behaving like men instead of women, without everyone starting out in a hostile mood....so when I saw this poem from Robin Sneed (I really hope you read it) this morning and the ensuing comments I thought hmmm, well here's the very topic- let's not put it off any longer.
For my part some quick history: former press secretary for local NOW chapter, started a long running womens/womyns only coffee house, taught sessions at men's conferences on homophobia as well as lectured on communicaton elsewhere. Lifelong supporter of equal rights for women but consider my self a humanist because I don't think either gender is superior and that we can all learn from each other regardless of gender.
I have become concerned about the tendency to assume that relationships are an area of female expertise because it gives men the excuse not to worry about it and women the hubris to think that they don't need to. I do hope that we can all communicate here without another feud ensuing but I realize that the title of my post is at least as provocative as the one I'm responding too. I hope that the many women that I dearly love here at OS don't take this personally. I have found you to be nothing but kind and understanding.
My goal is to make this a two-sided conversation. As a gay man I have been privy to and sometimes part of complaint sessions about putting up with men. As a man I have seen the results of the current one-sided discussions on the nature of men and women in relationships as being harmful to men and women alike. I think there has been some internal dishonesty among women about the nature of their communication with men and also that that fact does not negate the need for men to step up to the plate in regards to communication.
I hope that we can all have a long and fruitful discussion about this and despite the many areas of possible disagreement that it will be a respecful one as well. There may be some hard truths to be heard on both sides of this subject but they needn't be hateful. I am requesting ahead of time that if any one decides to troll here or to blast that we all just ignore it and continue the discussion around it. If there is one.


Salon.com
Comments
know
they can't learn while talking"
It's hilarious when taken out of context!
I also think your bio is funnier if it's something you made up as an attempt to duck criticism.
Those two observations made--I can dig it. I can dig both sides.
ohsotender, but you did comment and I did listen (and laughed) . I even wish you had more to say. come back anytime. Thanks
Leonde, I am not asking women to silence their voices but to consider it as another option when communicating. It took me a long time to realize that what I feel like saying now is often not what I wish I had said later and that at times being silent and seeing how I would feel later was the best form of communication.
I don't feel like I misunderstood the other post at all. I ruminated on it over night read it countless times and while it may have contained some good advice it also seemed to be slightly condescending. It was my hope to make a counterpoint here that women are good at one kind of communication and that men are good at another. That is why despite all the opportunities for being misunderstood I have opened up a dialogue. I hope you will be a continued part of it not just because I think we are saying the same thing but because you are part of opening up this topic beyond the basic sit-com nagging wife/stupid husband scenario. I think we both believe that men and women are more than that.
The reason I read it countless times before I responded was because I knew that there would be people like yourself that would try to shut it down by saying it is personal etc. I hope you stay around and become part of the subject but the subject is how can we all improve communication, men and women alike. I'm trying to find a way for us all to take a little responsibility for better communication and I thank your friend for starting that discussion even though I only agree with part of what she said.
Fireeyes, thanks. As someone who spends more time reading here than writing I love hearing all your voices. Some of my favorite writers here are christian although I am an atheist and gay. I have found that listening to some of them (Monte for one) has been healing. Most of my favorite voices here are women and I am glad to hear their diversity of thought. That of course includes you.
Sam, yeah I almost left that out but the coffee house served some hardcore womyn and I didn't want to leave them out.
Redstocking, thanks for your wisdom. I hope that you will come back here to this post and others and offer it often.
Listening and Embracing Silence are very yin and yang - part of the same circle, yet not the same thing.
Thanks, Tijo - I dig this.
Sally, thanks for the input here. My first real relationship was with someone who was very dysfunctional and in order to discuss anything I had to argue both his side and mine. I think I did a pretty good job of trying to see both sides but what I really learned was that each party can argue for themselves or they can argue for the relationship and that sometimes that argument was best done in my own head. It took me a long time to learn to just be quiet and let things play out for awhile. the need to talk/defend/explain was mine. The need for silent consideration was the relationships. I found I had much more constructive conversations that way.
I don't think I interpret this the way some do, as advice to shut up about everything - it seems to be more like being careful and loving about how you speak, whether you are at odds or not.
Rated.
Kathy-- Well I love that you love it. I hope you'll come back for more.
Ariana-- Not that talking isn't needed too. My theory is that the more tools we all have in our tool box the more likely we are to be able to fix the problems. If you think that I have a screw loose I hope you have more than a hammer.
George-- Thanks for getting it. It really isn't about blame but it is about responsibility and ultimately we decide for ourselves what we are going to be responsible for. I used to have a vicious mouth and a psychic like ability to find that sore spot and poke it. I always felt justified because I didn't start it. Then I went overboard in the opposite direction and mitigated too much of what I said. While there are obviously some who still wish I'd just shut up I've finally hit a spot where I'm halfway comfortable but still fine tuning.
If you're feeling bad about the hubby thing read my previous post about grace
http://open.salon.com/blog/tijo/2009/04/08/grace_and_the_atheist-_a_secular_sermon
maybe it will help, if not just scroll up and down my page and look at hot boys that's always cheering.
OE--I tried to but she's not talking to me either.