above it all
AUGUST 20, 2010 3:55PM

Just exactly where, sirs, may we exercise our Rights?

Rate: 22 Flag

Is the question really one of where to build? 

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niemöller
  

            When a long planned and first time trip to Italy loomed, I thought it would be a good time to learn about my ancestry.  Growing up with a very Irish name but believing I was Italian due to being raised in proximity to my mother’s family, I began my search with the hopes of learning of my Italian forebearers.  I loved both my “Nanna” and “Pop-pop” who both died way too young for me to know them well or question them about their lives.  I had little to go on and sorry to say, found very little to supplement even the scant information I had.

 

            Yet the paternal side was easy.  A few years earlier I found my great-grandfather’s (Irish) and great-grandmother’s (German) marriage certificate in a pre-Katrina New Orleans library.  That led to my grandfather’s birth certificate and then to my dad’s in Chicago.  My father’s mother who lived with us on and off through my childhood and always brought a dark, angry presence to the household and in whose ancestry I was least interested was incredibly easy to trace.  But she did have one little story that had intrigued me.  She claimed to be “The Perfect American” being of English and Native American descent and being from Boston.  Quite a claim!  Her ancestry was startling, to say the least.

 

            Her name was Lucinda Fairfield prior to her marriage to Patrick Henry Killcoyne.  I was able to trace her family tree (in which many Lucinda Fairfields resided) all the way to the 1600’s.  The Fairfield family was one of three founding families of Kennebunkport, Maine.  Besides the original ancestral residency, the family had been granted land in payment for fighting in the American Revolution.  I know I take the long way around, but here is where this piece really begins.

 

            The question is not where to build a community center or mosque or cooking school and gymnasium, it is who decides where anything gets built.  The cornerstone of prosperity of modern democracies is private property ownership.  Only when a man can own his acre and do whatever his heart desires within described boundaries can a man be free from the capricious whim of a feudal landlord or a slave master.  Add to the right of private property the right of freedom of worship and you have the unassailably absolute right to build said mosque.  End of story (if only that were true!).

 

            My father raised four boys.  In turn each of these boys did military time (with the notable exception of yours truly whose draft year of 1972 made avoidance of the military possible).  However, my only son joined the Navy and has been employed there since days after 9/11.  My father signed up for the Army Dec. 8, 1941.  He fought in the Philippines, Guam and other tropical paradises.  His father was Navy during The Great War.  On the Italian side, my “Pop-pop” served in the US military during WWI after a stint in the Italian military.  So you see my family has populated the ranks of those who would give their lives to earn and protect the uniquely American ideal going all the way back to 1776.

 

            Now that you have my bona fides on the subject of America, I wish to make a simple statement.  It is this.

           

            Those of you who believe that it is “sacrilegious” or “un-American” or “dishonoring to the memory of lost ones” or whatever other cover you wish to use against building a mosque within sight of Ground Zero are traitors to America and everything its men and women (and many times children) have sacrificed, fought, bled and died for.  You dishonor this country and all the good it has done since its founding.  You dishonor every person who swore an oath to uphold and defend its Constitution.  If you are one of those who swore that oath, you should be removed from whatever office you hold and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  You are guilty of treason.  No, you do not simply hold a “differing opinion” for if that was all it was then this great nation would allow and defend your right to do so.  Instead, you foment intolerance and hatred for your own petty ends.  You deny these words:

 

“I pledge allegiance to the Flag . .  and to the Country for which it stands”

 

“We the People of the United States, in order to form a More Perfect Union”

 

And most assuredly,

 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

 

                                       __________________

After all, if its consistency of dogma you are really after, I am certain there are openings in North Korea.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Your title is perfect, as a question like that is completely antithetical to the priniciples underlying the founding of this nation.

A nice blend of personal history and civics lesson.
Thank you Jeanette. Im not sure this was as clear as I would have liked it, but the issue makes me quite angry and Ive been trying to express that feeling for some time now.
I always find that those espousing the fears of "socialism" and "selective intolerance" are the ones who employ it the most. People like this are afraid, and what they usually are most afraid of are the things they can't look at in themselves, like their own bigotry.

Succinctly put my friend. I wish everyone in the Republican party would read this, and a few Democrats, too.
Oh, it was quite clear! And a thousand times better than I would have said it. Thank you. I have posted it to my facebook page.
I appreciate that, Peter.

Sparky, its either a case of transferrence or a case of total amorality. Oh, and my favorite part of all your comments is when you call me "my friend." :)
Well said and well written as always, Tim. I think I see more than a glimpse of a patriot when I look at your photo.
the constitution was written by slave owners, who despised democracy, regarded free women as household appliances, and tried to keep men without property from voting. some of them, notably jefferson, kept slave women for concubines.

your reverence for this document is misplaced, for they intended it to benefit the 'better sort,' gentlemen like themselves. any benefit to the lower orders were unintentional, and resisted fiercely, just as their inheritors continue to do today.
Penrose - Facebook? I am honored! thank you.

Coyote - My father had a lot to say about patriotism. All in the way he never said much. Just like religion for him, it was a matter of the heart, not to be shared promiscuosly.
Al - they werent all slave owners, and the fact that even those who were could compromise and create an enduring document says important things about who they were. So, no, my reverence for the document or the people is not misplaced. In fact, their fallibilities make it all the more important we speak up. (Well that and my grandchildren!)
Well-written and very important. Thank you. I live in lower Manhattan and am somewhat involved in the Park51 issue, and I find that Open Salon is helping me tolerate what feels like an attack on my neighborhood.
Thank you for expressing your well-founded opinion. I have been struck at how deeply OS writers have thought about this issue.

These are strange times for certain...
SemolinaTwo - I can only imagine. It sucks when your home gets used by people who know nothing about you, care nothing for you but find you a convenient excuse to project their hatreds.

Thank you Trilogy.

O'Steph - This piece has really been a case of writers block for me. I got so mad that it was hard to express clearly and in some way that didnt just sound like a nut's rant. I'm still not sure I said what I wanted to, but I had to get something out!
Tim: I could not have said it better myself. You have covered( I will try my best in my next post to elucidate the rest) the moral reason why true Americans have no business opposing the Mosque. The quote from Martin Niemöller also raises the question of what's next no Mosques at all and how long will it be till the next order of “business”; no church's except for those approved by a renegade and out of control corporate state and its brainwashed minions.
And of course, what's even more sick is the fact that these assholes deliberately did this for cheap political reasons. This whole thing is 1% concern about "sensitivity," and 99% demagogy.
Good to see you again Jack and I look forward to your post.

ONL - I think you are overrating the sensitivity part of this equation.
Those opposed to the Mosque are the same sort of person who rounded up Americans of Japanese heritage during WWII and forced them into concentration camps.... the same sort of people who had separate water fountains for Negroes and the same sort of person who probably has a few white pointed hoods in their closet...
It was not that long ago that people like me, and likely like thee, who were against the war in Iraq were called traitors by this same mob who have neither a concept of what it means to be a true patriot, nor any idea that religious tolerance in this nation is for ALL.

Glad you got this one off your chest, Tim.
Such a complicated subject, I like the way you presented it.
r
Wonder how everyone would feel if it was a monolithic structure of gargantuan proportions for the perpetuation of Scientology instead? Or another Catholic Church? Whatever....

Me thinks this has just become another media frenzy with lots of opinions and oppressive thinking, for which we are known to the outside world. The prejudicial angst toward the building of this mosque is both understandable and deplorable.

Either way, it is our right as Americans to feel one way or the other.
Feral - to take that one step further,some of these same people just voted down any further payments to 9/11 first responders. Incredible!
Dr C - exactly!
Poppi - thanks! coming from a writer I admire, that is fine praise indeed
Cathy - You are correct that we always have the right to FEEL a certain way, but I dont find the angst understandable at all. There simply is no justification, and the right to build is enshrined in our Constitution. To me that means End Of Story.
Tim - You're a true patriot, and a moron. Why won't you liberals ever get it? You can only use freedom and patriotisim if you're republican, christian and anti-muslim. Get with the program, Tim!
Besides, we all know the Muslims just want to institute Sharia law, enslave and mutilate our women's genetalia, stone to death men without beards and blow up mount rushmore. It's well documented, have you even been watching Fox news? Ha, I didn't think so.
Thank you Doug..... I think.
I apparently lost my way when I lost my christian faith. Its been downhill ever since.
Too bad the ones who need to understand this don't read differing opinions. Or that fascism means "one side". As a patriotic American, I am forced to let them stand on their own piece of land with fingers in their ears, hands over their eyes, and mouth in a bullhorn. If only there was a way to keep the soundbytes within their God's little half acre.
Oryoki - Im afraid we all have a level of blindness to what doesnt fit in our world view. That being said, I do find generally that people willing to engage in public hatred have unusually non-plastic minds.
Building good, bombing bad. Tarzan had it right.