TimingLogic's Blog

Reasoned, Relevant And Often Contrarian Commentary On Economics

TimingLogic

TimingLogic
Birthday
November 07
Bio
I'm an electrical engineer and mathematician by training. My career has spanned diverse areas of expertise from being part of a team which designed the world's most powerful computers to corporate consulting around business transformation and information-based solutions to being a corporate sales and marketing executive in the information technology and business consulting space. I’ve led teams responsible for innovative and transformative solutions and been part of teams that helped set strategy for many of America's greatest companies. Two of my interests are econometrics, democratic finance and quantitative - qualitative analysis. Over the years I have developed risk-based models and trading systems meant to identify significant investment opportunities and periods of extreme risk. My blog is an outlet for another of my passions, writing. I generally consider myself a contrarian. Therefore, many of my rantings are meant to encourage people to question what they believe to be true. Terms of Use & Disclaimer: First off, I don't take anything on here too seriously and you shouldn't either. These are simply sardonic rantings of Bill, my alter ego, often meant to agitate for peaceful & nonviolent reform. This web site reflects the views of its authors. It is unaffiliated with any NASD broker/dealer. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of anyone other than its authors. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes, comedic relief and entertainment only and are not investing recommendations. The authors may have positions in securities mentioned herein. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities. While information discussed on this site was gathered from what are believed to be reliable sources, in no way is informational accuracy guaranteed. All information on this site may contain errors and omissions. Trading and investing involves high levels of risk. Always consult a licensed financial advisor or broker before making any and all investment decisions. Authors of this site and any sites which are fed by said site, including Open Salon and others, will assume no responsibility for the actions of the reader and user. Readers and users agree, as condition to accessing this site, to release and hold harmless this site's authors from all liability in connection with this site or any views posted on this site. All readers and users of this site agree that use of this site requires acceptance to the current Terms Of Use & Disclaimer and that current terms include any and all use and material from site inception. If you do not understand these statements in their entirety or do not agree to be bound by this current agreement, you must immediately discontinue use of this site. This Terms Of Use & Disclaimer may change at any time and it is the reader's and user's responsibility to review, understand and abide by any updates.

TimingLogic's Links

MY LINKS
AUGUST 9, 2012 12:40PM

The Cycle Of Volatility Update: NASA-Funded Plasma Physicist Finds Hidden Magnetic Portals That Blow Another Massive Hole In Anthropogenic Global Warming

Rate: 3 Flag

 

"It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." -- Thomas Jefferson

 NASA magnetic portals video here.

I laugh whenever I hear Al Gore talk about how the science behind anthropogenic global warming is settled.    This is his defense used when a seemingly endless array of data and discovery doesn't fit his unscientific view of humanity's involvement in global warming. 

That Gore and anthropogenic global warming advocates, including its often fudged science-less data, continue to use the meme of settled science clearly shows an intent to control rather than an intent of discovery that is an integral part of the scientific process.   Remember, the human mind has only two intents in everything it does: the intent to control, a product of the manifested self or ego, and the intent of discovery, a manifestation of our higher power or what makes us human.   But then Gore is a politician.  Politics is nothing more than a game whose primary intent is control driven by the associated ego.    And we clearly know politics (control) subverts the purity of discovery as we see in countless arenas politicians and bureaucrats have now implanted themselves.   Political control relies on people outsourcing their own discovery to another person with an intent to control.  In other words, Al Gore is only able to advance his batty science-less theories because others are willing to outsource their own discovery process to him.    Frankly, that's the only reason Hitler came to power.  And, that very dynamic is the basis for Gore's entire political life.  A life spent trying to convince others of his legitimate authority.  But the only legitimate authority on this planet is the rule of law determined through reason, discourse and discovery.  Not man.   Gore ultimately failed in his intent of authority but found a new method of control; hijacked science.  Maybe someday Gore will get the help he needs and realize his journey isn't to find his worthiness by controlling and manipulating others.   But, then given Gore is now in his elder years, that would be an epiphany that is almost certainly never going to develop.

There's almost nothing settled in science when it comes to theory.   Any theory.  Theory that passes peer review remains relevant, whether completely accepted or not, whether accurate or not, until someone else invalidates some aspect of a theory through discovery and reason, regardless of how small that invalidation is.  There are so many holes in anthropogenic global warming that it has never passed peer review.  It never will.   The science clearly is not settled except with those who outsource their own journey to Gore as some messianic figure.   Anthropogenic global warming can't pass peer review so what is it?  It is a social movement.  It is the mob.  That's all.   In other words, its roots lie in propaganda and control.  And, being that most people are unwilling to admit they have been duped, it remains relevant propaganda for reasons of ego and the self.  How many times throughout history has the self been willing to defend unsubstantiated beliefs to its ultimate demise or until ultimate crisis?  We see that dynamic at work today across countless beliefs including neoliberal free trade and all aspects of American politics. 

When a scientific theory is put forth by a life-long politician who apparently never took a single science class during his education, doesn't therefore likely have an appreciation for the complexities of the earth's climate or the baseline in chemistry, physics or mathematics to propose a valid scientific theory, never showed any aptitude for inquisitiveness so necessary to legitimate scientific discovery and most importantly won't participate in the process of peer review and vetting, well, I think we can safely conclude Al ain't quite as front of the bus as he wants us to believe.  To believe for purposes of the self and ego aka control.   Al Gore and his politicization of science has hijacked discovery and reason and turned it into a political drama.  What would one expect from a drama queen?

While humanity most certainly affects climate, the forces of the universe and our planet acting on our climate are awesome and incomprehensible in comparison.  More importantly, they are clearly not well understood.  And, none of these dynamics are included in anthropogenic global warming's simple-minded models.  But, the science is settled.  Or so we are told.   This from a man who said the interior of the earth is several million degrees.  Of course, he's only off by several million degrees.  I would guess Al's remarks are no worse than Elmer Fudd, a fellow dunce, would conclude.  But then we live in a dumbed-down world where countless Elmer Fudds are running our nation,  our corporations, our religious institutions and other institutions of ego. 

Republicans are often the modern day incarnation of Luddites for their outright rejection of science.  The Democrats coyly pretend to embrace science but clearly reject it when it serves an objective of political control.  They do so by manipulating and politicizing science to fit their liberal agenda of brow-beating the rest of us into submission of their political agenda of control.   (Liberal and progressive are NOT the same. Dick Cheney, Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor, Al Gore, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are hyper or neo liberals.)  The politicization of science is everywhere and it is fueled by this false, dumbed-down left-right paradigm of political parties.  Climatology has become a left-right political issue ruled by the most incompetent and unqualified people in our society;  politicians and those who outsource their own intelligence to them.  Dumb and dumber fighting for control in the idiocracy (The president's cabinet in action).   Please God, awaken me from this Orwellian nightmare where dunces and stooges have hijacked the purity of reason, truth and discovery for purposes of control in the modern-day idiocracy.  Where people like Obama, Gore, Romney, Bush, Pelosi, Reid, Cantor, Boehner and other bought-and-paid-for lackeys determine what is real and what is science. 

Al's legacy will take care of itself in due time.  But, I have noted numerous times over the years where data doesn't substantiate anthropogenic global warming's curve-fitted conclusions.  One such post was one where I highlighted NASA's measurements of climate change , climate volatility and melting of ice caps all across the solar system.  Anthropogenic global warming advocates responded to this dynamic with more of their rationalized, unscientific absurdity.  But now, we have further evidence of the connectedness of the solar system's shared weather volatility.   That is, magnetic portals that provide direct energy conduits between the sun and most likely all planets and possibly moons in our solar system.  This dynamic may possibly even exist between planetary magnetospheres, which would possibly lend some scientific credence to mundane and planetary astrology; dynamics that seem to have very substantial long cycle merit. 

Scientists who study the sun recognize that the sun's weather volatility has been rising as has weather volatility on earth and throughout the solar system.  But the sun's weather volatility cycle is expected to peak next year.   This is confirmed by the recent discovery by Japan's Hinode exploratory satellite that the sun may be entering a quadrupole configuration leading to reduced sun weather volatility and lower temperatures on earth.    This dynamic  similarly happened the last time we had what many scientists consider a mini ice-age that ironically lasted the length of a Gleissberg solar cycle.   Life is cyclical.   The sun's weather is cyclical.  Earth's weather is cyclical.  The movement of our planets and our solar system is cyclical.  Those forces are impacted by cyclical events well beyond our knowledge.  Gestation, heart beats, seasons, birth/death... literally everything

The sun is literally over a million times larger than earth.  And the energy from the sun that impacts our planet in the blink of an eye is greater than any impact humanity has ever had since the beginning of our time here on earth.   Impacts from beyond our solar system are millions of times greater than the sun and are being discovered regularly.   And, then there is the massive energy created by the earth itself.  Most climatologists and scientists who actually understand complex systems have a great appreciation that our planet's long term weather cycles are substantially impacted by what happens in the ocean depths.  And, what happens in the ocean depths is substantially impacted by the earth's inner core and magnetosphere, which are in turn impacted by the sun, our solar system and beyond.   In other words, Al Gore has no clue what he is talking about as his simple-minded analysis takes none of this and countless other unknown dynamics into account.   

I've been writing for years we are most likely transitioning to a period of global cooling as volatility portends a change in trend and many cyclical patterns are pointing to a change in earth's weather patterns to a cold and possibly dry cycle.    By the way, history tells us that  democracy loves these cold cycles.   That may be coincidence or it may possibly be some interaction of energy dynamics affecting human behavior, awareness or consciousness.   But it is simply more anecdotal confirmation the status quo is in for a rude return to democracy. 

The discoveries by NASA and other space agencies around the world are happening at a dizzying rate.  And, they are rewriting the frontier of science.  But, those who seek to control science, for reasons of the manifested self and ego, are not embracing these discoveries.   What a surprise.  And, unfortunately we are not able to savor these advances in knowledge as we should because propaganda is subverting knowledge, truth and reason.  And because so many are focused on a fight to feed and house their families thanks to political stooges who have also tanked our democracy and our economy. 

Most of us who are young enough will likely live to see the day when Al Gore has to give back his Nobel Prize.   Well, that may never happen.  But we most certainly will live to see a day when bureaucrats like Al Gore are found out.   When those days of enlightenment come, and they are already here for many, that means those who are absurd will no longer hold political and propaganda reign over our lives as they do today.   Control versus truth.  The days of reckoning are upon us.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Uh oh! Now ya done it. The church of AGW is going to be all over yer butt on this one!

Days of enlightenment? You are substantially more hopeful of that than I am. At least, in the USA anyway. 'Merikans jes loooooves religion. Any religion can flourish there. The people have been indoctrinated into being sure that instant gratification of any desire is their 'right' as 'exceptional' members of their society.

Science is awfully hard work. Religion is easy. We need not guess which way is most popular, now do we? And folks just love doomsday scenarios. Well..... as long as the doomsday (or rapture, or armageddon, or whatever) isn't happening right now.

I thought the AGWers a bit odd back in the days when they acknowledged that mankind's contribution to atmospheric greenhouse gases was thought to be about 3% - tops. But the church of AGW wasn't satisfied that a mere 3% would provide enough guilt to get people all riled up about AGW so it's been increased to 100% in recent years. I guess that all natural causes such as those you mentioned, and volcanoes, and decaying vegetation, etc., which actually produce 97% of all green house gases, are to be ignored while AGWers send us on a guilt trip in an attempt to shut down modern society's industrialization.

Unexplained is just how it happened that the earth has experienced 6 or 7 ice ages, with global warming occurring in between each, before mankind even appeared on this earth. Unexplained also is the fact that our present warming period began about 17,000 years ago; long before we had any industrial pollution at all.

But then, as you so ably pointed out above, facts don't matter to "true believers." It kills me with laughter when they make such ridiculous claims as "most climate scientists agree" with their unscientific beliefs. Have they polled "most scientists"? Nope. No need. They already "know" what the results would be. Do they support funding for further research which might prove, or possibly disprove, their point? Nope, again, they already "know" what the results of that research will be too!

I am stunned by their "knowledge" that was somehow gained without research. I wish I knew how they do that. Heck, I could use a break from just reading about all the legitimate research that is being done in spite of it being underfunded because politicians won't vote scientists proper funding unless they're on-side with AGW.

Bah, a pox on the houses of all politicians & true believers.
.
The U.S. will lead the world out of this crisis. It will likely taking larger crises for the transformation to happen but almost all of the innovative thinking around government, money, banking, economics, sustainability and community are coming out of the U.S. Most people just don't see that innovative thinking because it is being suppressed by stooges like Al Gore, Barack Obama, George Bush and Dickhead Cheney. For now.

You're lucky you are our neighbor. That means you'll likely benefit as Canada has for the last two hundred years. :)
wait, a scientist proved something?

and we have to listen to THAT scientist above all others, why?

foolishness. you present your view, with "evidence" from the dude who backs up what you want to believe.

and everybody else does the same.

i take it your picture is out of date? cause thats quite a career for a man who looks to be about 35.
good post....but those that have to believe in global warming will just keep believing it anyway......can't be ruining any doom and gloom ,yaknow....
R
Not going to read your thesis here on a damned phone but do want to ask who you had to blow to get unlimited title characters?
There is no reason to listen to any scientist over another scientist. You are caught up in this paradigm of listening to men and not reason and logic. That you are shows how you are duped by the likes of Al Gore. We are a nation of laws and not men. Those laws should be based on science and reason and discovery and not the views of men. You unwittingly show how you reject science and reason and discovery by becoming a true believer in support of a message carried by a man. You outsource your thinking by doing so.

Contrarily, there is every reason to listen to discovery and a greater understanding of reality through that process of science, reason and logic. To reject any message of man and listen to reason, science and logic. Anthropogenic global warming advocates reject discoveries that embrace science, reason and logic by stating the science is settled - a form of manipulative control.

The picture was taken about five months ago. Thanks for the compliment re my age. Bitterness, personal/ ad hominem snarky attacks are the last grasp of people who have nothing intelligent to say. Typically liberal idiots who use manipulation and control in an attempt to gain illegitimate authority. You're on the wrong side of history, sweetheart. Good luck with that.

Umm.... "everybody does it" is a statement of ignorance and control that subverts discovery, reason and truth. Everybody does NOT do it. Everyone in the MOB does it. Everybody does it is why our nation is in the mess it is. Isn't it time you awaken from the dream world of ignorance that you live in? Come join me in a world of reason and logic and truth over a world ruled by men.
So many valid points here. As I said in a previous essay:
"Teaching people how to think requires teaching them that not all thoughts are smart, in fact, many of them are pretty stupid.What we have to learn, hopefully at a young age, is the ability to recognize the mechanisms which exist in all of us to embrace the irrational.

Once recognized, the mark of true intelligence and critical thought, is the ability to understand that beliefs are not facts and that facts, unlike our emotions and beliefs, are not instantaneously gratifying and are always subject to being modified by additional information. But the life and the society which strives to base it’s values, policies and objectives on facts, is the only hope mankind has."

Unfortunately, those who are in the positions which should be culpable for providing that education, seem much more likely to fall into the category of the ego-driven individuals you describe than those who would be thus inclined.
I've been writing for years we are most likely transitioning to a period of global cooling as volatility portends a change in trend and many cyclical patterns are pointing to a change in earth's weather patterns to a cold and possibly dry cycle.

Have you submitted your writing to any of the many scientific journals that would be interested in this topic? If you have a convincing case, then you should be able to convince climate scientists of your views. Otherwise... (And if I'm wrong in my supposition that you have not done this, what did the reviewers say?)
No, I haven't nor will I be submitting anything. Many of the factors I am referring to are those already published by competent scientists. Although there are some that include things like volatility that have nothing to do with climate and everything to do with other cyclical factors as well as astrological patterns that occur every 70 to 130 years, of which one I mentioned above, the Gleissberg cycle.

The top global climate predictor, who by the way uses nothing other than solar cycles and solar data, is astrophysicist Piers Corbyn. He doesn't use CO2 emissions that are frankly irrelevant. That is, unless you are Al Gore or are someone who outsources your thinking to messianic figures.