Tom Cordle

Tom Cordle
Location
Mayberry, Tennessee,
Birthday
June 16
Bio
I'm an author, singer-songwriter and seeker of truth, justice and the long-lost American Way. But the best way to find out about me is to read what I've written. There's a link to each of my posts at the bottom of this column.

Tom Cordle's Links

Archives
New list
No links in this category.
JANUARY 26, 2009 1:37PM

George W. Bush, You're No Harry Truman

Rate: 19 Flag

President Harry S TrumanThe presidency of George W. Bush ended with a whimper and an approval rating of 22%. It's hard to imagine anyone approving of his perfomance; obviously they believe he has been misunderestimated.

Bush believes he will be vindicated by history. He rests those faint hopes on the example of the man he compares himself to, the man he imagines others will compare him to one day. 

Sorry, George W. Bush, but you're no Harry Truman.

Truman made many tough decisions, and some cost him dearly. But rather than passing the buck as Bush did, Truman said "The buck stops here."

His decision to integrate the military led to the revolt of Southern Democrats like Strom Thurmond -- and forever altered American politics. When told that decision might cost him re-election, Truman replied that if it did, the job wasn’t worth having.

In 1948, 50 out of 50 top political pundits predicted his certain defeat. They were wrong; the experts were often wrong about Harry and about his policies, many of which have proven far-sighted.

Truman, after much soul-searching, ordered the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Some still decry that decision, but given the  suicidal resistance of the Japanese on Iwo Jima and Okinawa, it is likely that decision saved millions of American and Japanese lives.

But let us all pray, no president ever has to make such a decision again.

After World War II, he put the Marshall Plan in place, a plan that was roundly criticized at the time, but which many now agree helped prevent World War III and bring about the eventual downfall of the Soviet Union. 

Truman fired General Douglas MacArthur for refusing to obey orders during the Korean War, and though he was renounced and reviled for it at the time, historians now generally agree it was the right thing to do.

There has been a generally positive reassessment of Truman’s legacy, a reassessment aided by the fact that his behavior as an ex-president was so exemplary.

When he left office in 1952, Harry and Bess Truman drove home to Independence, Missouri, by themselves without a Secret Service escort.

In retirement, his only income was a U.S. Army pension of $13,507.72 a year. Congress, noting that he was paying for his stamps and personally licking them, granted him an 'allowance' and, later, a retroactive pension of $25,000 per year. 

In May 6, 1971, Congress was preparing to award him the Medal of Honor on his 87th birthday. But Truman refused to accept it:

“I don't consider what I’ve done to be a reason for any award, Congressional or otherwise.”

Truman never sought to profit from his presidency. When offered corporate positions at large salaries, he declined:

“You don't want me; you want the office of the President, and that doesn't belong to me. It belongs to the American people, and it's not for sale.”

In the end, he was beholden to no one,  and that gave him the advantage of being able to speak his mind plainly.  He once observed:

“My choices early in life were either to be a piano player in a whorehouse or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference.”

                      

Give 'Em Hell Harry

To err is Truman, you ever hear that?
I thought it was pretty damn funny
Well, I made my share of mistakes in this life
But it wasn't because of the money

The way I see it, I just did my job
There's not much else to the story
Doing my duty the best I knew how
Let someone else go for the glory

Now you take McArthur, the sonfabitch
That pipe, that hat, and those glasses
He posed like a statue most of the time
And preened for his adoring masses

Now don't get me wrong, he's a brave SOB
As a general, there weren't many better
But generals have orders like everyone else
To be followed right down to the letter

The thing of it is, there's no end to debate
Or ways to examine an issue
And there's too many yes-men kissin' your ass
And waiting to hand you a tissue

The buck stops right here, that's how it is
And I'll listen to just so much bitchin'
End of discussion, now it's time to act –
Don't like it? Stay out of the kitchen

But all that's behind me, I'm retired now
Captain Truman completed his mission
But those damn reporters still follow me around
I can't figure out why they listen

Well, they'll get no pearls of wisdom from me
I'm old and worn-out and contrary
I expect a reckoning one day real soon
Either Heaven or "Give 'em Hell, Harry!"

                     

Anyone who’d like to learn more about one of our better presidents is encouraged to read David McCullough’s thorough, entertaining and informative biography.

(For the record, a small portion of the content of this post came from a friend without attribution, though it has been substantially rewritten; the poem is mine from my book The Disappearing Cemetery.) 

©2009 Tom Cordle

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
We shall not soon see his kind again.
He's not even a Harry Hamlin.
No we shall not ...
But, Laura may have well been the new millenium Bess ... shy, demure, reserved to a fault ...

cheers for Missouri!!!
Winston Churchill, speaking in around 1950, said that in fifty years or so, when personalities were forgotten, Harry Truman would be recognized as one of America's best presidents.
George W. Bush = Harry Truman? I'm reminded of what the farmer said after the jackass had kicked him, "You just have to consider the source."
Greg - Amen to that, even Ronald Reagan was a better actor than Harry Hamlin

IMom - Much as I find admirable in Laura -- despite her inexplicable choice of a husband, tif the gossips in Texas are to be believed, she was hardly the church-lady, home-body that Bess Truman was. But that probably says more about the New Millennium than either of the persons
It would be laughable if it weren't so downright scary. I hope that Bush's damage can be undone enough that his legacy will become a footnote in American history, rather than a pivotal point in our decline.

The first comparison that comes to my mind when thinking of Bush is Nero, and not just for fiddling while Rome burned.
Wayne - Harry had that which can't be gained by accident of birth or via a misbegotten Harvard MBA -- experience. He knew about the plight of working stiffs, about the ugliness of war, and he had an appreciation for the sanctity and magnitude of the office of president that was nowhere to be found in the childish temper tantrums and idiot-speak of the fool who wanted to be king.
ok ... I'll agree with that ... but you get my point???

When you look at that picture of Harry, don't you feel safe??? ... calm and safe and happy, like maybe he's going to take you out for a pony ride later??? I love that about that picture.
OEsheepdog -- Then there's the old adage about getting a "stay the course" mule to change direction. First you have to get his attention by hitting him between the eyes with a 2x4.

Too bad none of the cowards in Congress had the courage to take the 2x4 labeled impeachment to this jackass. Russ Feingold and Dennis Kucinich excepted, of course.
IMom - You're right about that picture, except that to me Harry looks like the kind of Republican I use to admire, the kind that ran the party before it got religion.

I just can't imagine an ignorant, fundamentalist, semi-slutty (sorry, ladies, that's how she strikes me) former hockey mom - become fashion maven/clothes horse and filthy-rich author as the face of the Republican Party.

Something is terribly wrong with THAT picture.
The word yer all paraphrasing is "Integrity". It's been in short supply for a few decades. I have a feeling that your new President is about to re-introduce it to the lexicon of American politics.
As I've said before, "I'm so proud of you folks, our neighbours and long-time friends. Good on ya!
Larry - from your fingertips to Obama's ears -- integrity not only in word, but indeed.
I'm more of a Harry Bush guy myself Tom.
Greg, I'm sure you meant to type Harry Reid.
Hey, you're becoming one of our resident American historians. Nice.
Great post!

I heart Harry Truman. He showed a lot of backbone, when backbone was needed. It is not a coincidence that his name is so often invoked by those seeking the presidency.

W. on the other hand is nothing but a spineless bully, member in good standing of the lucky sperm club.

Gary, your first comment---HILARIOUS!
I just wish I could hear Harry Truman cuss out George W. Bush NOW. Most notably for having the chutzpah to compare himself to Truman.
Imagine someone thinking the office was not "his" to lose, but rather belonged to the people. Fitting tribute to a remarkable man. My only criticism is that The Departed should never be mentioned in the same sentence. Great poem. Love to take you up on McCullough. I would have to quit my job here on OS, but it's on my list.
Rob – Thanks. It’s a tough job but some poor – and I do mean poor – bastard’s gotta do it.

m.a.h. – As I’ve said many times, the advantaged never seem to get upset about the affirmative action that opened every door for bush – including even for the defective sperm that bore him.

shiral – Amen to Harry cussin’ out Bush - I ‘d pay to see that! I think Harry would clean the pretend cowboy’s clock in every way imaginable.
Jimmymac – Thanks for your praise of my poem– it’s a real kick to read it to people of my parent’s generation, and now even people my son’s age can understand that the difference between Bush and Truman is the difference between shit and shinola
I'm mixed on Truman. I like your poem, though. A lot.
Rich - Thanks for the kind words. Yes, Truman was not without his faults and his early days as a machine pol left much to be desired. But in my estimation, he more than made up for it with some very courageous stands on things like integrating the military - much like the gay controversy in the military now going on - and by flogging war profiteers and being the first to suggest nationalized healthcare. Frankly, I think this would be a much different, and much healthier country if he had succeeded with that initiative.
Great post Tom,
Comparing Bush to Truman is like comparing a common chicken egg to the finest Russian caviar. They're both eggs and they were both Presidents, but that's about it.
I don't see anyway to twist and spin Bush's never ending fiascoes to resemble anything positive, although I do see them trying. The problem is the facts keep getting in the way.
Truman ended the greatest war of our time and Bush started two wars and never finished either one.
Bush is like a horrible song that you just can't get out of your head. His only legacy will be total incompetence. Well deserved I might add.
Thanks for visiting Michael, and I couldn't agree more with your assessment. Riddle: Which came first the chickenshit or the chickenhawk? Neither, but we all got screwed anyway.
Tom,
Nice pun with "indeed".
Perhaps Greg just typoed "Hairy".
History has been kind to Truman because he was a good, humble man. History will never forgive Bush because he never was a good man and never humble. He will descend to the bottom of the heap and stay there forever. He and his policies may have ruined America for many, many years and that will become clearer as time moves on. The guy never succeed at anything on his own in his life and was totally unfit for the office. I hate the dumb fucker and think of him as not only incompetent but evil.
Larry if bad puns were good enough for Shakespeare, who am I to disagree.

Spud - You know holding back like that is very stressful, I think you should tell us how you really feel. Somehow the voters didn't get the message back in 2000 when it was revealed that a village in Texas was missing its idiot.
You know, of course, that on Bush's inauguration day, someone let a fog of "double your IQ spray" loose over DC. Bush was the only politician who's IQ didn't make it to double digits.
I hear that Time Magazine reported Bush to have an IQ of 124. Then 15,000 people wrote to Time to say that they'd put the decimal point in the wrong place.
Larry - I believe bush does have above average intelligence - he's just never used it. That's what makes his presidency, like his life, so utterly irredeemable.

I think the thought he was going to get to go up to Washington and have a lark for eight years as the beneficiary of corporate-criminal and easy credit economics. Had he studied his own resume, he would have known better. Now he has bankrupted his biggest business venture to date.

His memoirs, if ever written, will be the first presidential memoir written in crayon, and it will be titled simply Goat.
Let's not forget one of the homeliest presidential daughters in history, Margaret, who also had no musical talent but had something the Bush girls most likely never got... the full and total devotion of a genuine father. Plus, she went on to become a passable mystery writer.

This is a great post. Truman was a superior, visionary president who was so damn down-to-earth he never got the respect and admiration he deserved.

Tom, you did him proud.
Thanks, Sally, but all I did was throw up some flash cards - David McCullough did him proud. I think Truman has become admired at least partly because the was Everyman, or at least someone every man can imagine himself as.

I think that was the charm of bush initially, but charm wears very thin very quickly lacking any substance. And poor as he may have been, Harry Truman was a man of great substance.
Bush can write?.....Who knew?!!
I hope Bush can write. He sure doesn't no how to speak. Or maybe he is just misunderstoodulated..
Now, gentlemen, let us not speak ill of the not-so-dearly departed. Aw to hell with it -- go for it, we won't have George W. Bush to kick around much longer.
I wonder if Harry Truman could survive in today's political spin, media driven Washington. Will history vindicate Bush, it depends on who writes the history.
Mtodd - Interesting question. Probably not, Harry had a tendency toward bluntness and a hatred of equivocation that would not sit well with the present-day pusillanimous pols and pundits.

But Truman is in good company; neither Jefferson the Deist nor Lincoln the self-educated, ungainly, squawking genius could get elected today.
When it comes to selecting a leader, the last place I look for information is the media. To many people listen to the talking heads with ever asking is what they say true? To often instead most political dialog is directed at what if reasoning instead of what will most likely happen.

A good example is the decision to close Guantanamo Bay. I hear (I am assuming educated men and women) say we cannot let these terrorist roam the streets. Really is that the option?

In reality it means that all prisoners will have their day in court. If found guilty they will be imprisoned, if not they will be let loose. We cannot play what if or wild case scenarios. If someone is found innocent they should be sent back to their country. This country is not about imprisoning someone for what they might do, but for what they have done.
Great post, Tom, I enjoyed the poem at the end. There's no comparison between Bush and Truman.
MTodd - I've maintained since BEFORE he was elected that anyone who actually looked at Bush's awful record of failure wouldn't hire him as a janitor, much less as POTUS. I tested this on a banker friend who was chagrined to admit he had no idea about bush's resume.

If bankers' don't have more sense, what can we expect from the hoi polloi? But I guess we now know bankers' don't have as much sense as the hoi polloi, bu they sure do know how to separate the hoi polloi from there little bit a poi.
Scruffus - Glad you liked it. Thanks for visiting.
Since I did not live in Texas I have no idea what Bush's record was. The people of Texas liked him. Of course democrats didn't, but hey they hate every republican, just as every republican hates the democrats.

When viewing a political record, I try and look at both records without the editorial. I believe the mainline media outlets are so editorialized in their coverage that it is hard to get the straight facts.
If I want an over the top republican view I will watch Fox and if I want an equal over the top democratic view I will watch CNN.

When making my decision whether to vote for Obama I read his website on the issues. I tried to look at his very lean voting record in the state senate and then did a lot of soul searching. Frankly it came down to a bigger picture decision for me.

I know McCain was out because of his constant flip flopping and being a Washington insider. Hillary was out for the same reason.
I like Huckabee and his core ideas until he started pandering to the evangelical vote thinking it would put him over the top. I don't blame him for trying to find a base, just for misjudging just how much pull this group really has.

Honestly up until the day of voting I was going to vote Libertarian, not that Barr was a good choice, but long term we need a strong third party and I like the Libertarian ideals, if not totally practical.

I liked Obama less when he chose Biden for the ticket. And not happy about Hillary on his staff, but sometimes you have to pay the piper to do business in Washington. When I voted for Obama my only concern was electing a black president would go a long way towards bridging the racial divide in this country. Since it was about the only real gain from this election that made since for me, I voted for Obama.

I hope he does keep his promises about the trade policies, and works to reform health care. I do not want to see government provided health care, but there is a need for reform in areas of tax cuts and full deduction for medical insurance for individuals who pay for their own healthcare. Tax cuts for businesses who are willing to invest in this country, and reducing the military spending for WWIII type weapons.

So I am taking a wait and see attitude and giving the man his chance before I get exited either way.
We share many of the same views. Like many, my initial view of Obama was formed by his 2004 DNC speech. That led me to read his books, and I found him to be intelligent, thoughtful, careful, moderate, compassionate, reasonable -- in short, all the things bush was not.

McCain fell from grace with me when he sucked-up to bush after what was done to him and his family in SC in 2000. And the Palin decision was the absolutely last straw.

You might enjoy my pre-election post on Obama and McCain:

http://open.salon.com/content.php?cid=17913
Palin was entertaining for the first week. I could see why they picked her, but seriously if you are going to run for VP at least brush up on what a VP does.

Palin diverted most of the thunder from the DNC. But once the initial impact she had nothing going for her.
Tom awesome post as always. Giv'em Hell Harry would definitely have words for George W. and I don't think I could express them here, since this is a 'family' type blog. But if George W sees himself as Harry Truman, he should look more towards Ken Lay & John Thain... both failures with not support of their constituents.

Thanks & Rated
Thanks, George, it just occurred to me -- it must have been rough during the last eight years having the same name as the fool
LOL... luckily I'm George M.... so George W. was several rows back from me!
Get thee behind me Satan