Tom Cordle

Tom Cordle
Location
Beeffee, Tennessee, CSA
Birthday
June 16
Title
Peasant
Company
Pleasant
Bio
"I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false, and incur my own abhorrence." Frederick Douglass __________________________________ "There's only one way to win in this world and that's to like yourself." Harry's Ghost __________________________________ “And let it be noted that there is no more delicate matter to take in hand, nor more doubtful in its success, than to set up as a leader in the introduction of change. For he who innovates will have as his enemies all who are well off under the existing order of things, and only lukewarm supporters in those who might be better off under the new. This lukewarm temper arises partly from the incredulity of mankind, who will never admit the merit of anything new, until they have seen it proven by the event.” Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, Chapter VI

MY RECENT POSTS

DECEMBER 8, 2010 1:48PM

Deeply Disappointed

Rate: 40 Flag

Dear Mr. President,

I am deeply disappointed in the "compromise" you reached with Republicans that granted income tax cuts and death tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans. With each new 'compromise', you make it more difficult to support you.


In your press conference, you stated that the battle over taxes was much like the battle over the public option. Indeed it was, Sir, but not in the way you imagine, and it was another false move on your part to remind your supporters of that bitter failure.

You see, Mr. President, even your most avid supporters do not view healthcare reform as a success. Yes, some of the worst abuses of insurers were curtailed, but at far too heavy a cost – and the reform fell tragically short of dealing with the underlying problem of healthcare costs.

Yes, I blame Republican obstinacy and intransigence for that, but your incomprehensible negotiating strategy of starting in the middle and then meeting your opponents halfway is not what I call compromise; that is capitulation. To me it is surrender before the battle is even fought.

Apparently, you see this as wise policy and good politics, but I fear you are wrong on both counts. Policy without principle is no policy at all – that is something you could learn from both Left and Right. As for politics, in the end, your approach may appeal to half of the muddling middle, but in the process of gaining that half a loaf, you are, day by day, more and more, alienating the Left.

To be frank, I will most likely vote for you again in 2012. I’m old enough to understand that a non-vote is a vote for your opponent, and that is an alternative too horrible to contemplate. But it is a serious miscalculation to count on people like me carrying the day for you.

If things continue as they are, at least ten million deeply disillusioned young voters and minority voters will not vote in November, 2012 – just as they did not vote in the midterms in 2010. And they, not the muddling middle, are the key to your re-election. These voters need to be inspired; and while you may be inspiring, your soft-sell approach and your compromising certainly is not.

Meanwhile, the Rabid Right, who you could not satisfy even with total capitulation, will vote in record numbers regardless of which incompetent the Republicans choose to run. The worst of them will vote for a red dog before they’ll vote for a black man.

I don’t know what assumptions underlie your political calculus, but if you’re assuming the economy will be substantially improved by November, 2012, you are making both a political and an economic miscalculation. That’s a bet worse than those made by the Financial Products Division at AIG.

Yes, there will likely be some improvement in unemployment by 2012, but the bitter taste of down-sizing, outsourcing, devaluation of home prices, foreclosures and the other consequences of Reaganomics that have led to the decimation of the middle class will not be forgotten for decades. As ever, people will be looking for a scapegoat. And you’re it.

Still hoping but not audaciously,

Tom Cordle
Tellico Plains
, Tennessee

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I wonder if anybody actually reads these things at the White House?
This is about where I am right now, as well. Very well said.

Listening to the news this morning, I heard someone say that the Republicans were pleased with this deal. Well, of course they were. They didn't really have to give up one damn thing. Despite appearing to have their panties in a wad over it, they don't care that unemployment benefits were extended. They just needed that issue as leverage.
"Axelrod! Gibbs! Get in here! Have you seen Cordle's latest? Damn it all, I told you to run this tax clusterduck by him first!"
It's funny in a way -- a year ago the media talked about how the Republicans were a lost party in exile and how they would never recover. Now they're saying the same thing about the Dems. Maybe there's still hope.
- well said, Tom. Where is the fight in this President?
It's like theme day at OS...Sigh.
Tom you are surprising me I was beginning to think that you were incapable of changing your mind. I applaud you! If Hillary Clinton is not the democratic candidate in 2012 I will not vote and neither you, my sister, nor any of the OS people of who have opinions I respect will be able to convince me otherwise.
Tom,
Well written, as always.
It is a disappointment for sure. However, I will vote for any Democrat--local or national--rather than vote for those who have usurped our political process with their money and their lies.
The Prez's hostage analogy was most faulty. Okay. We'll drop our guns in front of the mad psycho who's holding the American public hostage. So does this mean that the psycho will start treating the hostages better from now on? And the psycho won't try pulling this trick again for another two years? Duh!
Well said Tom. I don't know what I'll do in 2012. But I'm sure I'll be scared.
Tom, I magine some golpher in the basement reads these them puts them in the furnace to keep warm. It seems that Obama only listens to Obama and somehow he has talked himself into believing that the republicans will meet him halfway. I know he's unexperience, but even he should know that the republicans haven't went to meet anyone halfway since Hoover!
Well, that about sums up my feelings as well. I'm sniffly and achy today and I'm not sure it's entirely due to a cold.
After 8 years of Idiot I was hoping for at least 4 years of Asshole With Balls. Mr. Compromise has wimped out again. Nancy Pelosi for Prez! The Queen Bitch gets the job done!
Jeez o pete ! 30 years since Lennon died, Pearl Harbor Day yesterday with all the memories of parents and their sacrifices, Obama's limp explanation and then letters like this all over the place. Not saying I don't agree.
Just ...dang.
Yep. Could not have said it any better than that. Sadly.
I can't honestly say I'm disappointed in Obama since he is essentially what I expected he would be before he was elected. The Dems are not what they once were, although there are a handful that are pretty decent. If Tennessee is as Red as my state, your vote won't count, anyway.

Carry on,
Rated
Everyone should read Michael Ventura's recent column.

http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/column?oid=oid%3A1115340
I think Obama does amazingly well for the crap that is thrown at him by Fox and the Radical Right. Yes I wish he would have stood up sooner and downright CLAIMED the healthcare bill as ObamaCare and declared how it really would help Americans instead of allowing the Republicans to compromise it almost outta existance. I still think he's getting something in getting the Congress to vote "yes" on anything. And he did not, but he SHOULD have claimed his many many victories this first two years of a Democrat Congress. Why is it the loud mouth Foxites are getting all the press? Manipulation. I guess it needs to go both ways. We just don't have as much money as They do. Crap.
Obama is a large piece of fruit. Can anyone guess what kind?
But Tom, don't you see? The deal was a triumph for the common man! A brilliant piece of statesmanship! 11-dimensional chess! Lincoln! Churchill! Ronaldus Magnus!

You should be grateful, you dirty hippie!
Thanks for all the comments; forgive me for not responding to each of you, but I'm dealing with an illness in the family this week, in addition to the usual holiday madness.

As for my wondering out loud if anyone at the WH reads these emails, I got an answer -- of sorts:

Due to the high volume of messages received at this address, the White House is unable to process the email you just sent. To contact the White House, please visit:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

Thank you.
Tom, if we all send letters like this, maybe somebody will read them and listen. I'm an optimist, so I'm not giving up. We can't afford to give up.
Great post and I completely agree. So maddening.
rated, Tom. you said it all.
Well written and well argued Tom. I just posted a longish comment in blu's blog covering much of the same ground. The gist of it is that I'm unconvinced that a more confrontational approach, as satisfying and electrifying as it might be, would achieve better legislative results and decrease the chance of any Repub winning the WH in 2012.
It seems increasingly likely that U.S. right-wing USraeli$ got what they desired with Hussein's win over Hillary in the primary demockeric elections just a half-dozen or so trillion$ ago.
If anyone but Jack Heart and RW005 are running, count me out.
I don't know Tom. Maybe I'm not "old enough" to understand that a non-vote is a vote for the greater of two evils, but I lost any sort of hope in the system many years ago.

I was born in that brief lull between Reagans invocation of the cowboy myth and his official inauguration into that myth.

My parents fell prey to the right wing conservative christian movement that sprung up as a direct reaction against the 60's and 70's.

I say all of this to put forth this question: why should I believe that any president has the interests of anyone in mind besides the wealthiest in our country? seems to me that I'd have to be an utter fool (and more than a bit insane) to believe anything that comes from the mouths of those in office.

So perhaps it makes sense that anyone who was born in the last 29 years might have good reason to stay at home come election day 2012.

Would you believe in a system that has bankrupted your entire generation?
Tom, I think you stated the concerns very well, but I fear that if the Prez's political operatives did read this they would boil it down to one essential thought: "To be frank, I will most likely vote for you again in 2012." As long as they have your vote, they really don't care how you feel.

They need big corporate money, and lots of votes, to stay in office. Of the two factors, the big money comes first because that's how they buy the coverage that drums up votes. (Besides, all their friends are rich too.) So they won't risk alienating the big money unless they know progressive voters are about to desert them in droves. Why on earth would Obama change if he thinks he can take progressive votes for granted? He needs to be forced to make a hard choice.
Don't know what to think anymore. Very discouraged.
Nobody's talking about S 510 and all the Democrats who voted for it in the Senate; and all the Democrats who are voting for it now in the House, even though they could have killed the bill on a technicality. Nobody's reading this, Tom; and if they are, they're not paying attention. Their agenda is non partisan. Anyone who thinks otherwise isn't paying attention.
Gambits can pay off at times, but if all you do are play gambits in chess, you find yourself losing in the end: you will have no pieces left.
As usual, you're 100% right. r
If you could transport this issue back in time, replace it with the issue of whether or not to rebel against England, and the diplomacy necessary to gain assistance from France, you might have the same feelings about Ben Franklin. John Adams did. Adams was a passionate believer, but he needed Franklin. It is not always a straight path. Walking in a straight path resembles more of a wobble as you step from left to right than the path of a wheeled vehicle which just rolls. Distance traveled is negotiated. Progress is negotiated. This will be negotiated. I love Nancy Pelosi and Bernie Sanders. If I were in the caucus I would like to be one of them. But they will never bring the independents. We need them to win.

{Rated} because you're awesome.
The planet is ruled by an increasingly Fascist wealthy ruling class, including corporations, and those in government, in politics, and in the media are their mouthpieces, servants, and whores.

I will probably never vote again as Obama's election proved to me once and for all that Ralph Nader is right: there's no difference between Repubs and Dems, and I would add, because they're all millionaires and billionaires and serve ONLY their corporate masters. Elections are pointless as Obama proved, doing little he promised and making a mockery of the Nobel Peace Prize....he's no different from Bush, after all!! So, vote with your wallet. Stop using banks. And remember what Napoleon said, "Religion is the only thing preventing the poor from killing the rich...." As he well knew, religion's sole purpose is CONTROL!!!!