My long absence on my annual pilgrimage to the North Country has likely prompted some to imagine I've abandoned this outpost of semi-sanity in an otherwise absurd world. Truth is my absence has led me to question whether writing here is worth it.
The answer to that question? Yes, so it's once more into the breech -- only this time I'm going to avoid all the too-obvious political targets. No, this time, I'd like to ramble a bit about what I do when I'm up North.
• • •
Newaygo, Michigan, is a quiet little town on the Muskegon River. In many ways, it reminds me of a quaint European village. It's also the home of my mom, my brother Craig and my sister Sandy. Family is my real reason for returning North; music is my excuse -- it also helps pay for the trip.
Say Michigan, and the first thing that comes to the minds of many is Detroit. But Newaygo is smack dab in the middle of the state, and it is far removed from Detroit culturally and geographically. Indeed, in many ways it's far closer to Tellico Plains, Tennessee, than Detroit.
Newaygo is a place where pubs may outnumber churches. Sister Sandy runs an open mic on Tuesday at the Riverstop Pub and on Thursday at the Riverstop Grille. It was at the Riverstop Grille I first met Nathan Syfrig, the fantastic violinist who's flown in from Seattle four years in a row to accompany me. Nathan inspired one of the songs I wrote for this year's concert, a song called "My Violin Weeps for Me."
My Monday night show at the Riverstop Pub drew a crowd that surprised the owner -- which hopefully means there will be a return engagement for a third year, Lord willin' and the crick don't run dry -- though given the global-warming instigated droughts we've witnessed of late, that may be a possibility.
But I promised I wasn't going to get political -- so back to the show.
• • •
Newaygo is only about eleven miles from Fremont, Michigan, but it's a lot farther away culturally. Fremont is farm country, Amish country, and world headquarters of Gerber Baby Foods. It was once home of the most millionaires per capita of any city in America. In short, Fremont is about as conservative a place as you'll find outside the Deep South. And just as in the Deep South, in Fremont, Jesus is a Republican.
It should be obvious that Fremont is not a place where revisionist history is welcome. But revisionist history is what I do, and I make no apologies for it there or here. Fremont is also the home of the Dogwood Center, where I've played a half-dozen shows, including my four "History in Song" concerts.
• • •
The first of those shows was called Children of Columbus. In it, I argued the treatment of indigenous peoples and the introduction of slavery by Columbus and those who followed him laid a curse on the New World, a curse we are still suffering from.
My second show, Self-Portrait: A Musical Autobiography, exposed my own considerable flaws. The idea was to give some insight into how my mistakes in life provided inspiration for my songs. You might say it had a flavor of lemons into lemonade.
Last year, it was the White Man's turn to face the music. The concert was called Native Sons, and I spared no one, including Thomas Jefferson, in exposing the perfidy of the White Man in stealing the land from its rightful owners. One of the songs I wrote for that concert was called Here Comes the White Man (There Goes the Neighborhood).
There's a lot of talk these days about American Exceptionalism, but those promoting that nonsense fail to mention America's treatment of indigenous peoples. That behavior was so awful Hitler modeled the Holocaust on it, even borrowing the phrase The Final Solution, coined by General William Tecumseh Sherman when he was in charge of dealing with the "Indian problem".
• • •
This year's concert was called Roots - A Biography of the Blues. In it, I paid tribute to the idiom that fathered most American pop music, including jazz and rock'n'roll. Defining the blues is just about impossible, but to my mind, it's a marriage of the field hollers and work songs of slaves and the chords, melodies and instrumentation of mountain music -- which is highly derivative of Celtic music. What distinguishes the blues is an emphasis on rhythm and a unique blending of major and minor scales.
The blues had an unsavory reputation which kept it out of the mainstream. Certainly, during the uptight Victorian Era, no self-respecting white person would admit to listening to "race music". But thanks to the cloak of invisibility provided by the advent of radio and records at the turn of the 20th Century, that began to change.
Certainly, no fair-minded person could deny the virtuosity or inventiveness of an artist like Scott Joplin. And W.C. Handy, the self-described Father of the Blues, added an air of respectability with his erudite and articulate defense of the art form, his musical transcriptions, and his compositions such as St. Louis Blues.
• • •
My show also paid tribute to some of the old bluesmen who labored in relative obscurity creating the blues, men like Charlie Patton, who inspired John Fogerty of CCR. Green River, the title of one of CCR's big hits, was borrowed from a Patton song. Out of respect and gratitude, Fogerty paid for the tombstone that marks Patton's grave.
Lonnie Johnson was another bluesman I mentioned in my show. Lonnie was a child prodigy, a virtuoso on both violin and guitar. Growing up in New Orleans around the turn of the 20th Century, he was exposed to all kinds of music. Listen to his song To Do This You Gotta Know How, and you'll be amazed at his mastery of the guitar and at how sophisticated the blues already had become a century ago.
Lonnie Johnson's playing inspired much more famous guitarists like Django Reinhardt and Charlie Christian. Lonnie never received the kind of recognition he deserved; but to those in the know, he is the father of modern blues guitar.
• • •
Another man who doesn't get the credit he deserves is Sam Phillips. Phillips is known, if at all, as the man who discovered and first recorded Elvis Presley. But he was also the first to record several great black blues artists, including B.B. King and Howling Wolf. Upon hearing Wolf for the first time, Sam said "This is where the soul of man never dies."
Unfortunately, despite the best efforts of Sam and others, it was still difficult if not impossible in the early Fifties to get airplay for records by black artists on mainstream radio.
• • •
I concluded the show with several songs by and about my musical idol Ray Charles. Ironically, it took a blind man to tear down the wall separating black artists from white audiences. Ray was able to do so because he didn't see music as black and white. To Ray, music only had one color -- blue.
Ray burst through the race music barrier with a song called I Got A Woman that was equal parts gospel, blues and jazz. Critics were hard-pressed to pigeonhole it, and instead, they came up with a whole new genre for music like Ray's. They called it soul music ... and that it was ... music straight from the soul.
Ray not only made black music acceptable to white audiences; he made country music acceptable to black audiences and white city sophisticates, by recording -- against the advice of almost everyone -- an album of country music. Modern Sounds in Country and Western Music was such a smash hit, Ray recorded a second volume of country songs. Country music would never be the same.
Ray not only changed music; he changed the culture as well. He was one of the first black artists who refused to perform for segregated audiences. In my view, through his music, he did as much as anyone to bring the races together in America.
They called Ray a genius, but in typical self-deprecating fashion, he deferred. Ray said someone like Duke Ellington was a genius, the kind that came along once in a century. I agree, but I beg to differ with Ray's self-assessment. Ray was a genius, too, and there will never be another Ray Charles.
©2012 Tom Cordle


Salon.com
Comments
Thank God I'm able to mooch off the government -- you know, at the public library. At least for now -- I'm sure Mitt Stake and Ayn Ryan want to privatize them, too. And why not -- everyone knows Republicans don't want them because they can't/don't read.
Damn, there I go again getting political! But given the opposition, I can't help myself.
Still here at the library, so I've got a chance to say Hi backatcha, and thanks as always for the kind words.
Nicely done.
Good to see you back.
Thanks. It's been a real joy for me to be able to use my gift for something a bit more than entertainment. I'm afraid our educators have lost sight of what the ancients knew well -- that music is a powerful tool to educate. Homer understood that, and so did Shakespeare, who chose to write in verse.
Thank you
Oh, there's a reason you've had trouble logging on. The site has had a lot of trouble lately. I'll get you a PM on that.
This sounds like a great show. Glad to know it went well.
One of my most memorable afternoons was spent in the way back sitting in the shade on a hot day, talking and singing with the late Mance Lipscomb, whom I had the honor of opening for at a festival. He was thrilled to see that having been raised real churchy I knew the blues songs as well as the spirituals that long ago day.
Good to see you around.
I saw Ray live in the Mid-Sixties at the Grand Rapids Civic Center, and he brought the house down. After 45 minutes of listening to his band -- nineteen pieces he traveled with at the time, as I recall -- just blow some great jazz, they led Ray out in a purple sequined smoking jacket of some sort, and he ripped it up on the sax. I didn't even know he played horns!
At one point, he started singing "Ruby", and some gal way up in the balcony yelled out "Oh, Ray, sing it for me!" in a very sultry voice. Ray grinned and said "I hear ya, darlin'!" It was that ability to make an intimate connection with his audience that made Ray something more than just a musician. Sorry to get political again, but if Mitt had that gift, he would be President.
Yup, I sing and play, a little guitar, a little bass, a little keyboard and a little harmonica. I play just well enough to stay out of my way -- most of the time.
Musically, I'm all over the map -- blues, country, rock, folk and a little bit of jazz. Same goes for the songs I write. Programmers and PR guys would probably pigeonhole me in the catch-all Americana, whatever the hell that means.
Someone else once described me as a storyteller, and I'll cop to that. In any case, what I try to do -- in a concert setting, at least, is educate a little while I entertain.
Good to be back , and what a thrill for you to play with Mance!
Once again we operate on the same wavelength. When I moved here to the mountains of East Tennessee, I was accepted (as much as an outsider -- and a Yankee to boot -- can ever be accepted) because I knew and could play all the old mountain hymns like I'll Fly Away, Softly and Tenderly, Amazing Grace, Precious Memories, I Saw the Light, Tramp on the Street, and I Didn't Hear Nobody Pray.
And just think -- most all that great music was made by people MittStake and his kind think of as worthless dregs on society. When your values can be measured only in dollars, you may be financially well-off, but you're morally bankrupt.
I do have to agree with you about Fremont... I got there a couple of hours early and wandered around town a bit. Holy Smokes I got some ODD looks. I'm used to being looked at funny but I have to tell you I was decidedly uncomfortable wandering around the downtown area.
I am glad you are back,Tom,remember,"you will not go quietly".
Thanks for mentioning Ray Charles.
~r~
Sorry to hear of your loss. Glad you enjoyed the show, sure wish you could have stayed around, I would have loved to meet up with you.
PJO
Thanks, yup, I'm still kickin' -- and the easy ones twice. That reminds me, heard from Fever lately?
Margaret
Thanks, but that's not really my face -- I bent over for the pic
Thanks. While I was up North, a buddy of mine gave me a T-Shirt that says Music Man.
Heidi
You're far too kind. As always, you make my head swell, but it's nice to be a fathead where you're concerned. Good to know you're a fan of Ray Charles, too.
Scupper
You've obviously read my book.
ChiGuy
I'm even sorrier you missed the show -- I know you would have loved a tribute to the blues. As for the house, it sounds like the foundation is a bit shaky these days.
When one of your posts crops up I confess I brace myself for a dose of anger and hate. I'm pretty sure I'm one of the people said anger and hate is directed towards. Still, I'll take a peek if I feel up to it.
Now I can't help but wonder if I've missed the point entirely with Scott Joplin. In my unread white man Southern ignorance I enjoyed playing him because I felt there was a deeper meaning there; a meaning beyond the tendency some have to "show off" when playing him and play fast: something Joplin himself lamented near the end of his life as the growing tendency when playing rags.
So I play "A Breeze from Alabama" at a somewhat leisurely pace. To me it sounds like a guy and girl meeting for the first time at the St. Louis World's Fair. They fall in love. Yes it's subject to interpretation, but I've been pretty sure up to now she's the breeze he's referring to, not some kind of undercurrent of change or ill wind kept down by ever present forces of racism -- the ones that are constantly with us even to this day.
It's going to be a hard interpretation to part with. Not just because I like it, but because I think it's the one Joplin intended.
Thanks for visiting in spite of me. Hope you got something from the post in any case.
I'll cop to anger, but hate? There's damn few people I hate. There are some people I find perversely amusing (particularly a Feverish troll who often comments on my blogs), some I find stupefyingly ignorant (particularly those who believe someone like Sarah Palin was/is qualified to be a heartbeat from the Presidency), and some I find deeply conflicted (particularly those who can't seem to comprehend the inherent conflict between Capitalism and Christianity).
I'm frustrated by those who are obviously intelligent, but seemingly unpersuaded by evidence, and thus they continue to hold with ideas that have been so thoroughly discredited over the last three decades ... evidence that makes it clear Trickle-Down doesn't work ... that tax cuts for the wealthy don't create jobs (consumers with discretionary income do) ... that deregulation does not work and simply makes it easier for the worst of us to take advantage of the rest of us.
My anger is reserved for those who know better, but continue to propagate lies they know to be false and promote hatred in order to prey on the ignorant and control the fearful. Guys like Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and Roger Ailes are at the top of that list.
As for Romney, he may be smart (he's casting doubt on that), but he certainly isn't wise. Frankly, he evidences many symptoms of sociopathy -- facile charm, self-indulgence, lack of a moral compass, callous disregard for the feelings and problems of others. While I'm certainly not qualified to make that diagnosis, I find it useful in explaining his behavior.
But again, this post was not intended to get into all that, so let's talk Scott Joplin instead -- a much more pleasant subject. I agree completely with your assessment that speed is often the enemy of beauty when it comes to music. Not familiar with the song you mentioned, but too many play ragtime too fast. Players ought to keep in mind the sexual connotation of ragtime; a loping feel and tempo is advised with the music, as well as with copulation.
As Chuck Berry once sang:
"I got no kick against modern jazz
Until they start to play it too damn fast
I lose the beauty of the melody
Until it sounds just like a symphony"
Playing fast is not always playing well. Intensity does not require ferocity, as evidenced in two of the greatest jazz albums of all time Kinda Blue and Time Out.
In short, in music -- as in traffic -- speed kills.
Good to be back. Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but I'm always surprised when I'm given and EP. I haven't a clue what makes this post worthy and so many others I've written not.
The bar had an entertainer with drum machine. It was great... too bad I can't remember any names. The Gerber grandaughter was the wrangler at the camp....closer to Fremont.
But aren't you also outraged by the current expropriation of people's justly owned property through taxation and eminent domain?
Aren't modern public accommodation laws and smoking ban laws, laws forcing property owners to include and exclude people on or off of their property -- people who they might not want to include or exclude -- just as an immoral violation of property rights as forcing a 19th century Indian family to do things with their property that they might not want to do?
I see no difference. Property rights is property rights; stealing and trespass is wrong all the time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGJncRP--ow
Good to see ya hear Tom! Fascinating summations here.
Just visited Michigan for the first time in my 29 years of life in early August.. up north-- Traverse City, Elk Rapids, Kewadin as well as the Ann Arbor area (drove past "the big house"). Love the place as I suspected I would from all I had heard.
Sorry I missed you in the rush. Yes, Ray's music was like a kick in the groin, especially to the stilted sensibilities of the Fifties. But to my way of thinking, I Got A Woman wasn't nearly as obscene as tin-pan-alley crap like How Much Is That Doggie in the Window and Rock'n'Roll Waltz.
Thanks for the help with the pronunciation. Still sorry we didn't get a chance to talk.
jlsathre
Have your daughter check out my sister Sandy's open mics -- I'm sure she'd enjoy them.
There's a campground between Fremont and Newaygo off old Hwy 37 that might be where you were a counselor. By the way, my brother lives on a lake near Whitehall, Michigan, where the first Boy Scout Camp was established years ago.
snarkychaser
I wish you had, too. As for millionaires, that was back in the Fifties, as I recall. Fremont produced a number of them because they bought Gerber stock early on. Fremont is a small town, so it didn't take many millionaires to bump up the per capita.
As for Duluth, I suspect it has a number of millionaires because it's an important Midwest shipping point for iron ore and grain.
"I see no difference." Thou has said it.
Apparently, you are blind to the fact that since most tribes had no written laws, it would have been impossible to have establish "title" to the land in any manner that would have satisfied those bent on stealing it. Besides which, most tribes believed the very notion of owning land was absurd. By their reckoning, it was as foolish to speak of owning the land as it was to speak of owning the air they breathed or the sky above their head.
You may find such ideas childish; I don't. Indeed, you would find it impossible to convince an "ignorant savage" that a law could be unjust and still be legal, a folly white people all too willingly accept.
Damn, I wish I'd known! You weren't that far away from where I was. I'd have surely bought you a beer or two. As for your link, I'm glad you looked Lonnie up, but I'm afraid I Can't Do This Because I Don't Know How.
The Bad Scot
Don't know if you've seen the movie Sweet and Lowdown, but there's some great Django style music in it. Thanks for the correction, perhaps I was thinking about loading myself into the breech of a gun by firing off this post or the pain of a breech birth.
By the way, I can't see or hear Mudcat Saunders on the air without thinking of your own political voice. Do you guys play together in a band by chance?
Actually, some tribes did establish what we might consider as property rights, such as carving out exclusive hunting and fishing areas. Tribes had common understandings that certain areas and burial grounds belonged to somebody else. But yes, no written titles in modern form.
But my point was that if we are going to be outraged by violations of ownership that happened in the past to Indians, we should also, if we're consistent, be outraged by violations of just ownership today. It's the same type of thing. A person can not defend eminent domain, estate taxes, etc., and be simultaneously outraged by American Indian land theft without being in a contradiction, an inconsistent position.
And yes, I do find the idea of land being unownable as childish.
And yes, I have seen *A Man Called Horse*, *Dances With Wolves*, the "Crying Indian" commercial, etc., etc., etc., but I still don't buy the Indians-are-more-moral idea.
American Indians destroyed entire forests and prairies -- hundreds of thousands of miles -- through starting fires. They wiped out entire animal populations through overhunting, murdered and enslaved one another, and generally behaved as one would expect scattered bands of Stone Age humans to behave under a "tragedy of the commons" scenario. Many Indians were unjustifiably forced from their rightfully owned/homesteaded land, but this property theft doesn't mean Indians were maintaining a Garden of Eden.
Even if you continued to parse Indian tradition into an interpretation of property rights, you will keep arriving at Western tradition and philosophy. In those loose agreements on hunting grounds, etc, private property isn't defined so much as an inviolable "right" as conclusion, but a way to administer property for the common good.
That's as much Chief Seattle -- whether we take that as accurate or not -- as it is Aquinas' property as subservient to common good and, later, Locke's sufficiency proviso. Even Jefferson, the nutball right's favorite founder to misrepresent, didn't believe in property as a Right beyond sufficiency, and his efforts to dismantle primogeniture and entails doesn't much resemble your silly attack on estate taxes as theft (you left out violence, are you slipping?).
You're the one with the inconsistent position, as it's out of step with Western and liberal philosophy and American tradition. Yours is a child's attempt at philosophy, where liberty is defined by one inviolable rule and reason, function and justice aren't considerations. When people want a system that doesn't work and that encourages and enables liberty being demolished by ideology, we'll be sure to give you and your navel gazing cohort a call.
Meanwhile, you have accomplished something -- a mindset that ensures you a lifetime of raging against reason and declaring humankind blind to knowing how to be free. It might be a lousy job, but at least it's full time.
Good to be back. Don't know Mudcat Saunders personally, but I think it might be fun to play music with him. He's one of the few political operatives I can stomach -- and I hope his candidate Wayne Powell drubs that vile twit Eric Can'tor in November.
Born to Lose is a great country song, and Ray made it his own -- as he did with so many other songs . I try my feeble best to pay homage to him by performing Georgia whenever I get the chance, as I did in the concert at the Dogwood year before last. During this year's concert, the band and I played I Got A Woman, You Don't Know Me and What'd I Say. I also performed a song I wrote called Willie and Ray that contains these lyrics:
The best kinda people are always the ones
The labels just never quite fit
The real thing's the feelings they have in their hearts
And not what they wear over it
The call Willie country and Ray r'n'b
But the words only got in the way
And a young boy believed in the best of both worlds
And kept listenin' to Willie and Ray.
That young boy was me, but I was not alone.
Surest sign the Mayans are right? Me on the front page. Lefty and I are forming our own political party -- the other GOP -- Grumpy Old Persons. You're welcome to join and come along for the slow, short slide to oblivion.
You are as ill-informed about Native American practices and beliefs as you are about economics. I'm well aware there is much debate about the authenticity of the Great Speech of Seattle. But regardless of authorship, the truths contained therein are worth heeding. Contrary to your characterization, it is White Men who raped and pillaged these lands, not Native Americans. They ruled these lands for at least ten thousand years and left them substantially as they found them. If you can't be bothered with history, you at least have the evidence of your eyes.
But as you admit, you don't see it. Willful blindness is worse than the other kind.
You said "t strikes me how lucky we would be to have gathered round to listen to your concert."
What a lovely thought, but it would have been me who was lucky.
I am a fan of OS,too.
http://open.salon.com/blog/malcolmxy/2011/11/14/angels_and_devils_dance_to_the_beat_of_the_same_drummer
When the aliens come and wipe you and yours out because they believe that our modern property ownership is childish, and you somehow live through it, only to be forced onto the least desirable land that they don't want and given an alien drug that you have no experience with which is immensely destructive to you, but that you have no natural defense against addiction to, then come on back and talk about this shit.
Until then, I don't give a shit what you've seen. You've obviously not learned empathy or respect, so give that a try and then wait for the aliens and then come speak about the plight of the American Indian. Deal?
Thanks for the kind words, and I'll post some music soon.
As you say, avoiding politics is impossible these days, and while I was gone, I ran into a fellow I graduated from high school with who proceeded to say he wasn't going to vote for Obama because he was a Marxist. When I asked him to explain what a Marxist was, he didn't have a clue.
So I explained that under Marxist rule, the government owned everything. I asked him to explain what the government had taken over since Obama was elected. GM, he said, and I corrected him and explained the government didn't own or run GM, that the govt had basically loaned GM money when no one else would in order to preserve and important industry and hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs.
He was unpersuaded by facts, but at least had the good sense to shut up when confronted with them -- which is more than I can say for most of his ilk. And so it goes with those whose only source of information is Fux News and Glenn Beck.
i bet u are up for it.
" Truth is my absence has led me to question whether writing here is worth it.
The answer to that question?
Yes, so it's once more into the breech -- only this time , I'd like to ramble a bit about what I do when I'm up North."
that is indeed the ticket here!
as for what use it is to write here, i would humbly suggest
that we sane people have an obligation to spread sanity.
seems like some damn holy duty.
american exceptionalism is maybe not a myth,
if you keep up the good fight, exposing the
gutless apes with their
monkey bizness.
or just tell us what's what, with u.
u are the kinda fella i often wonder how he is.
missed u.
I don't know music well enough to totally appreciate the history lesson, so without a foundation it sort of zips overhead. I do appreciate that you get out there and make it happen, and the adventure is interesting. That's why the welcome back rather than trying to discuss what I don't know. I'll take your word for it, though.
Larry is a tempting target, but even more so when he unwittingly defeats his own argument. In the general sense, it was a claim between tribes over grounds, not individual owners, and it was common ground among each tribe. In both examples--tribe to tribe or within either--there is a property arrangement designed to promote the common good. That is reflected (ironically, considering what was done to the tribes) in Western philosophy in general, as well as valid political philosophy.
Larryism is a come-lately fringe ideology that arrogantly and ignorantly thinks that after centuries of history and political philosophy, a small gaggle of ideologues have figured out a simple magical formula to replace reason. It's pure crap, but he's sometimes fun to read for shrill hyperbole.
I hope this comment didn't coerce you to read it, or commit violence by doing so.
Thanks for the kind words and no need to apologize for the link, I'll be glad to visit.
Thanks as well for you reply to Larry. As I said, I hoped to avoid politics in this post, but since I've been dragged into I suppose I ought to just have at it.
First let me admit it's as foolish to speak of Indians as a whole as it is to speak of White People as a whole. For instance, the Lakota were/are as different from the Pima as Italians are from Swedes. Still, one has to resort to some generalizations to even have this sort of discussion. So ...
It ought to go without saying, but since it apparently can't, let me state the obvious. Native tribes tended to place far more emphasis on the common good than does our culture, which tends to emphasize the individual to the point of rendering the commonweal an evil, as evidenced by the views expressed above by Larry the Libertarian.
What makes such views all the more pathetic is that people like Larry hold such views while benefiting from public education, public streets and highways, public police and fire protection and public armed forces. Like children, they take such things for granted without (apparently) comprehending that someone has to pay for them. One of the most ludicrous examples of this folly was the sign at a Teapartian protest that read "Don't Socialize My Medicare".
I'm not fool enough or racist enough to suggest that Indians were somehow racially superior, and I don't buy into the notion of the Noble Savage per se ... all people are subject to the same needs and desires, and thus subject to the same temptations. BUT (a very large but), cultures are very different in what they promote and what they permit.
As I like to put it, "I'm not sayin' Indians never lied; they just never figured out a way to make a living at it." Alas, it is readily apparent from the past and present of the putatively deeply-religious Mitt Romney, the self-proclaimed fair and balanced Rupert Murdoch, and countless other Kings of Vulture Capitalism, that one can make a very, very good living in our culture by lying.
You wrote "as for what use it is to write here, i would humbly suggest
that we sane people have an obligation to spread sanity. seems like some damn holy duty"
I'll admit to feeling a certain sense of obligation, and in my heart of hearts, feeling a certain sense of satisfaction at performing my damn holy duty -- in spite of the fact that it so often seems so fruitless. All that may be in vain, but whatever the truth of the matter, I will not go quietly.
Thanks for the revisit. As for your confession, you're not alone. Each time I create one of these History in Song concerts, I am amazed -- but not surprised -- at how little I know and how much I learn in the process. For instance, I wasn't aware of either Charlie Patton or Lonnie Johnson when I started putting my Roots show together. Sad to say, I'm far from alone, which is one of the reasons I mentioned both here.
As for Larry and his ilk, as I tried to suggest to Retalbo above, people like Larry aren't to be hated; they're to be pitied -- until they get in positions of power, and then they are to be made the subject of the ridicule they so richly deserve. I am glad to see that very thing happening now to a pompous ass, an obnoxious twit like Romney.
Thanks for the welcome back, and your envy humbles me.
Thank you for one of the best backhanded comments I've had since the Eisenhower era. For that, I'm giving you an Indian name -- Wolf Who Sleeps With Sheep-- you wear it like a Walmart suit.
Shouldn't it be "God willing and the creek don't rise"?
Also: " in typical self-deprecating fashion, he *demurred*".
Other than that, very readable.
jesus mythology should taught us that!
i dont wanna get pinned up to a telephone pole.
dont they look like crucifixes? or is it just me who thinks so?
nah, we got our manly SEED.
women are the light of the FRUIT.
which is why o gotta win the wimmin vote.
"very readable, eh? Damning with faint praise seems to be the order of the day on this post. Oh well, faint praise is far better than none. And no need to apologize for nitpicking -- it saves me from coming off as a nitwit. But while we're on the subject, I remind you that a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, and niggling criticism is something up with which I will not put.
As for "crick" not "creek", those familiar with southern vernacular would not object. However, you are quite right about "demurred" -- that was one of those increasingly frequent occasions when one part of my brain knew better, but the other part of my brain couldn't recall the word I really wanted -- thank you for supplying it.
I'm afraid Evanston, IL is a fur piece frum Newaygo and Fremont :-).
I think I do a pretty good job of exposing my martyr complex here. But --- to paraphrase William Jennings Bryan -- you shall not crucify this man upon a cross of telephone wires -- I've got the Internet -- for what it's worth.
And you've probably sung this song a time or two
"You get a line, and I'll get a pole, honey
You get a line, and I'll get a pole, babe
And we'll go fishin' at the crawdad hole
Honey, baby, mine"
That's be a mighty fur piece
I stand corrected on several counts, and thanks for the compliment.
As for "don't rise" and "don't run dry", I've heard it used both ways. You're quite right, the first is more obvious, but once upon a time folks depended on that crick for their water, for their sustenance (fish, turtles and the aforementioned crawdads). In some instances, it might be used for transportation, since a larger creek could bear passsage of a canoe, rain permitting.
Wonderful story about Bunk Johnson. It's been my experience that the world is full of Bunk Johnson's -- that is to say, extremely talented people most of us have never heard of. It's also been my experience that despite the lack of recognition and the rough life most of these folks are forced to live in order to pursue their art, they are very giving of their time and talent. Joni Mitchell sang about such folks in her song "Playin' Real Good for Free".
i returned to this post to get revved for the end of the political season.
haw! fruitless u aint.
much fruit!
discussion is fruit.
they wanna clamp down on it, these miserable
misers of liberty.
fuck em straight through!
continue!
I agree with clayball.
I have been aloof too.
I rode from O.S town.
`
Tom Cordle hopped on Old Grey Horse.
He QUIT that Old Lame Whore's Tricks.
He in Search of Fun Lovin' Bunny Rabbit.
`
I am Apolitical too.
You Live Longer.
Kerry Sing Tune.
He Out-of-Mind.
Oh, Disharmony.