You feel shame, you know. And then you get free

(Slapshot)

Tony Wang

Tony Wang
Location
San Diego, California, USA
Birthday
September 05
Company
www.buyandholdplus.com
Bio
Just a city boy...but definitely not born and raised in south Detroit

MY RECENT POSTS

JULY 31, 2009 9:38AM

Why Insurance Companies Oppose the Public Option

Rate: 3 Flag

You will hear many organizations, politicians, and pundits say that the public option for health insurance would destroy the industry. There are claims from a research group funded by Unitedhealth Group that 100 million people would switch from their current health care plan to the public option, thus destroying the industry.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, however, only 11 to 12 million people will switch to the public option. Obviously, this will have an impact on the insurance companies, but it will be far outweighed by the addition of the 45 million people without health insurance to their customer base.

So why is the health insurance industry so opposed to the public option? The head of their lobbying firm claims that the public option would add significantly to the costs of those who keep their private insurance.

In the airline industry, there's something called the Southwest effect. Here, when Southwest Airlines enters a market, the other carriers are forced to drop their fares in order to compete. That has the effect of driving the cost to the consumer down.

Insurance companies are afraid that the public option will do the same thing to their premiums.

And an article in Business Week shows why this can happen. Right now, according to the American Medical Association, 94 percent of the 314 metropolitan markets it reviewed are controlled by one or two insurers. In 15 states, 50 percent or more of the market is controlled by one insurer.

Insurance Market Share

So, naturally, insurance companies are concerned about a new competitor. The public option, if it survives, will create competition where little exists right now. This will force the insurance companies that now dominate the market to compete, and it will force them to raise the quality of their product and/or cut their prices.

That, of course, would eat into their margins. Raising the quality of their product would likely mean they need to hire new employees. Of course, hiring more employees would help with the unemployment problem we are facing, but it would cut into margins. Lowering prices has an obvious benefit to the businesses and individuals who purchase those services, but again, it would eat into margins.

It has been said that when investigating a situation, you should follow the money. Buy and Hold Plus believes this is the case for health insurance reform. If you're wondering why insurance companies who claim to welcome competition are fighting tooth and nail to keep the public option out of any health care reform, follow the money. And if you're wondering why various politicians are fighting against it, once again, follow the money.

submit to reddit

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
The answer is money. They want ours and any attempt to keep it from them justifies dead babies and seniors, sick kids who can't get a pair of glasses, Drastically reduced life spans for working people who will have to be hauled off in ambulances from the workplace before missing an hour of work due to illness. It isn't just insurance industry giants who are not happy with a public option. Large scale employers are not happy about it even though it would cut their costs significantly. If people could go to a doctor when they were ill then they would miss work, oddly enough, just like the executives do when they are ill. Health care reform isn't just about payment. People are covered and afraid to use it for fear of losing their jobs. At General Dynamics they have a policy they call no-fault, what it means is for any reason you are penalized for missing work. Illnes that isn't work related or permanent is used to quickly rid themselves of you. This is wrong. Subject i think for another blog. Good info here.