When do you know a movement has run its course?
When it loses supporters who were willing to donate to its cause.
Let's review. Initially, I was supportive of the Occupy San Diego movement. I blogged about seeing the initial march and how I supported them. I visited the site and wrote about their platform. And twice, I donated food and water to them.
It's pretty clear I was supportive of their message and their platform, which included things like bringing back Glass-Steagall and implementing a tax system like the one Warren Buffett advocates.
But they lost me.
They started to lose me the second time when I went to give food and water to them. Most of the people were very polite and appreciative of the donation. But as I was helping another person bring what he purchased for them to the site, something happened. He dropped some change, and when he bent over to pick it up, one of the occupiers took the change, threw it, and said go fetch.
After that, when that gentleman and I were talking, he gave a biscuit to a dog. The person who owned the dog was very appreciative. And someone else with a dog was taking pictures.
On my way out, I walked over to where that dog was. I said to the dog, "hello, puppy" and the owner snapped at me "leave my dog alone." It's a very strange situation when the human's the bitch and the dog isn't.
Now mind you, I had just given food and water to these people. Talk about ungrateful.
I was still supportive, but not as supportive. I wasn't going to let a few bad apples spoil the bunch.
Then the San Diego police moved in to clear the area. There are reports that excessive force was used. On the other hand, people have said that bottles and cans were thrown at the police. I'm sure there's some validity to both the charges of excessive force and to the police contention that they needed to protect themselves.
But the response of the Occupy San Diego protestors to this was what cost them my support.
This is what they posted on their facebook page.
"In every nation, in every age, you tell us you’re indispensable, that without you we’d all be killing each other. BUT WE KNOW WELL ENOUGH WHO THE REAL KILLERS ARE. YOU WON’T FUCK WITH US MUCH LONGER."
I cannot support an organization which basically says what NWA said a while ago -- fuck the police.
Instead of pushing their platform they've chosen to act like a petulant child.
You can protest until you are blue in the face and you can camp out on whatever spot you want. But if that's all you're going to do, you won't accomplish anything.
How about having someone talk to the media about how you want Glass-Steagall reinstated or the Buffett taxation plan put in place?
That is something people can rally behind. That is something that is actionable.
If you're just going to sit there and insist that you can put tents up when there's a law on the books that says you cannot, you'll just get arrested and lose support.
If, on the other hand, you put together a cohesive message with something people can act on, you will become a force to be reckoned with and you will accomplish something.
Hopefully, they'll do the latter and I'll be able to support them again.
Until then, no food, no water, and no more support.


Salon.com
Comments
you might not even remember when this wasnt a fascist nation.
How can we fix a problem when we cant recognize it for what it is?
Regarding the tents, you are write there are laws on the books about it. It is called the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. Congress shall make no law prohibiting the exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition their government for a redress of grievances. I think the arrests and police violence have actually increased support for the movement as a whole, as the masked face of fascism is exposed.
Don't be a summer soldier or a sunshine patriot.
I support their right to protest the live long day and to try to effect change. But in the end, that's what made me walk away. They are not doing anything to push change. Now that the spotlight is on them, they need to push for the millionaire's tax and the reinstatement of Glass Steagall, among other things.
They are pissing away a golden opportunity to actually coalesce behind something because they're more interested in channeling NWA.
As far as your solutions, a millionaire's tax and Glass Steagall, who are they going to ask to make those things happen, the millionaire's in congress, the wealthy banks and politicians who got rich with the elimination of that act? The point of this movement is that the current system has failed us, so why would we ask it to solve our problems. The occupy movement is modeling solutions by its very existence and structures. You need to think outside the existing structures that are dysfunctional and look to other more creative solutions. That's what the occupiers are doing.
As long as the Supreme Court says that the mere act of giving money to a politician is protected speech, I'll come down on the side of saying that tents are speech.
I think that there comes a point when it's bodies that matter. Bodies taking up a space and bodies being arrested.
The more I find out about the protestors, the less inclined I am to support them. I saw two of them on the Colbert Report yesterday. The worst the right wing nuts could do wouldn't have done as much of a job of making them look ridiculous as their own actions did.
In any organization, there has to be a leader, and there has to be a plan of action. As far as I can tell, beyond essentially repeating what NWA said a decade ago, there is none here.
And this is indicative of the problems with the protestors. They're focusing on tents instead of the eight points they released.
I can't support them anymore. The Colbert Report piece was the last straw for me. Wiggling your fingers to show you don't support something? Give me a break.
Comparing them to the hippies in the 1960s insults the hippies. The hippies at least had a clearly articulated point they could get across even when they were stoned out of their minds -- get the troops out of Vietnam.
These guys have a platform, but nobody knows about it because they're busy focusing on trivial, silly things instead of doing something to effect change.
I want action. Protest for the sake of protest is not action. It's pointless.