
Can It be Real?
The promise of a lifetime
In the weave of words today
A leader stirred
An authentic deal?
Who feels the pain
Of those who live by a thread
Lest they keel?..........................
Published in “Chowringhee”, a magazine in California, on the occasion of Durga Puja, 2008, I wrote these words the night of the acceptance speech by then Senator Barack Obama, at the DNC in Denver, commemorating the moment. I was sending it to my friend for publication the next day when the air waves were swamped with another name “Sarah Palin”. Who? What? WHAT?! Frankly I had never heard of her. The next few days were spent in a rush trying to unearth as much about her as the media would give. Everyone went crazy! Can you blame anyone? I mean look at her! Flaunting the feminity that many women would hesitate to wear in fear of not been taken seriously.
A million words have been written with her, about her, for her, against her, by her and I have nothing more to add as facts. Worthwhile pundits have established she knows very little about administrating, history, geography or politics for that matter. It was clear she could speak, okay ……perform, albeit off-key and off the mark! Katie, of all people exposed her lack of erudition and it was downhill from there. But somewhere deep inside me, there was a radar picking up familiar signals. The fighting spirit. The desire to succeed against all odds. The anger at men and people who had used her for some agenda of their own. Maybe Madam was not ready; maybe she did not have it but was it not the Presidential candidate who should have vetted that fact? Was it not she who got sucked into it because she has never ever failed before and why should she not have jumped at the opportunity? Is it wrong for a woman to be ambitious or to have high opinions/expectations, however misplaced? As an aggressive Indian American woman, I need to understand this obvious ambiguity in accepted social perceptions. The onus is upon the public to out-vote her opponent, but why is it wrong of her to even try? Democracy does not make the demand of an intellectual as a leader. Does it not rest upon popularity and personal appeal?
Why is there this nagging feeling inside me of wronging her? She does everything to deserve the tomatoes being thrown at her in Minneapolis today, or the verbal and written abuse and yet one wonders... Professor Higgins would have found her quite a delicious study. Yet, I envy her. This is uncharacteristic, but I really do. It could be because she has succeeded at a level I have not. Is it because I see her using her sexuality successfully and as much as I cringe at how many years it is taking women back, the thought about men using their advantages gained over thousands of years keeps haunting me. I was shocked when Julie, my friend who is a fantastic scientist, claimed that she absolutely loved Palin for being exactly who she is. A brave Christian woman who says it like it is. Huh? Also what did she actually say other than words which meant nothing? Still, she bothers me and obviously everyone else. She writes vacuous (and mis-)statements on her Facebook and Huffington Post is all over it. Even the White House spends precious energies refuting her instead of focusing on the essentials. A much admired co-blogger on Open Salon says he would rather have his daughter be a prostitute than a Sarah Palin! Really?! Do I understand prostitution incorrectly then?
The other day I walked into Barnes and Nobel and picked up “Going Rogue” and walked over to the seats to read as much of it as I could since I was not going to buy it. I felt the same kind of pleasure reading any story dealing with Princess Diana while she lived. Her death put a damper to that! I digress… An acquaintance from my Cancer Research Institute was sitting in one of the chairs and as I slid into one I ACTUALLY apologized for having Palin’s book in hand. Like it was an intellectual no-no. I mumbled something deprecating about how I wanted to see what crap she had written. I was actually ashamed of being seen with the book! Was I becoming a snob?

I started the book and only got through the first few pages of her describing her family’s move from Idaho to Alaska. I visited Alaska this August and I was just wondering if I would/could have EVER done that. Skagway is a one street town of around 800 people! She grew up there hunting, fishing, existing. Being good at whatever she did, she was probably treated as an equal. The media tells me the rest of the book is full of fluff and nonsense. But I have feeling that I have the Madam Palin-(syn)drome in full and will get back to it someday just to understand this feeling inside me. Palin is the niggling natural politician that appears in the horizon rarely. Pretty, populous, pathetic, powerful and puerile all in one! And on Open Salon, where I can express my inner most secrets I confess this urge to find out all about this women who is swimming against the tide, making enemies of the crocodiles in it and somehow still surviving.

A car rental in Skagway with Palin’s famous usage of the word “Sourdough”.
Alaskans use it for permanent residents of the state as opposed to the newcomers.
Acknowledgement:
Cartoon by Sunil Adam, Editor. His cartoon characters are based upon two influential experts on international affairs, George F. Kennan, a US diplomat who came up with the policy of containment, and Hedley Bull, a British academic and father of realist school of international politics. He has been a guest blogger on Huffington Post and now here, on my blog site.


Salon.com
Comments
I know many intelligent women like you and I learned from all of them. Palin is a disgrace to all women because she is the epitome of ignorance, anti-rationalism, anti-intellectualism and vomiting demons in paperbags-Jesus wants us to kill others-religious fundamentalism.
Very well written piece.
Rated.
Is it not more upon the electorate to either vote or not for any candidate. Please tell me how many politicians are there who do fill exactly the description you have given of Palin. Mendacity and opportunism is the keyword. Some are found guilty of crime and are still leaders beloved by their people.
What is it about her that gets everyone so polarized?
Wm F. Buckley believed that people below a certain IQ level should not be allowed to vote, but clearly people below that same, certain IQ level have been elected to high office, lately a certain president and twice!
I agree with you, she is allowed the dream, whether it be realistic or not. So often a man is allowed his dreams and manages to self-destrct while doing so, I say let politics be an equal opportunity dream maker/breaker.
Wonderful, thoughtful piece.
And while we're being honest here, I too, could not get enough of Princess Diana and cried when she was killed. Although, she was, I believe, a class act.
I think there's some feeling against her because she's a woman, as there was with Clinton. Unfortunate. Beyond that, and taking their common handicap into account, Palin offers stupidity, cupidity, nastiness and religious fanaticism, while Clinton has some solid qualities. Why not groove on the successes of Clinton, Albright, even Thatcher? And give equal-opportunity condemnation to someone who is in the same psycho (tho not even intellectual) league as the despicable Beck, Limbaugh, O'Reilly and feminine cohorts like Coulter, Malkin, Cheney, etc.
Sorry, I just can't get with the program...
I just want to register my comment: your oped was the best I read on sarah palin. a deservingly introspective piece.
That aside
@ OES: Thought up anyhting yet?
@scanner: How many people do you know who can spew words that others tell you with such aplomb! Of course she is performing and of course the words are not hers but at least give her points on effort and diligence! I have noticed that the very bright students in a class dont do do as well as the ones who try the hardest and put in the effort and want to do well.
But they do have everything to do with what she said when campaigning and now in her book. She has no problem speaking big lies as if they are truth, stirring the pot with underhanded, willfully distorted issues and willfully inciting the radical Right into a dangerous froth of madness.
I do not care if she is beautiful or not, intelligent or not, knowledgeable or not. I do care that she appeals to all of the basest instincts of the American electorate and we may be just stupid enough to elect her. If we think that is impossible I have three letters for us: GWB. And as the Professor says, "twice."
A simple comparison of Palin to Hillary Clinton exposes all of what Palin is not.
I see no basis for envy and have long moved past the early pity I felt for her when she was dumped in the middle of the election campaign unprepared. She has long since proven by her own words that she is not competent to govern.
She can run, but she is too vain to hide. And if she does run she will do even further damage to the already antagonistic choosing of sides in the US, a position that defies compromise and further erodes the ability to govern and govern effectively.
She and Chaney are the most divisive politicians in America today.
@Buffy you have no idea how I agonized I was writing this. I was asked to write an op-ed and was thrashing around my brain for something . Of course thinking I would write about the President. I even started with the poem I had written for him abut my pen wrote the rest itself. As I wrote I discovered this hidden envy and I had to call it a syndrome since it was not just one symptom it was a whole host of ideas well hidden in me. I remember arguing it with Julie once and she had been so vehemently 'for' her and I showed her the very things that all the commenters have commented. Yet the more I spoke the more I felt I was looking into a mirror and if I had been in her place I may not have fought in the same manner but I would have fought nevertheless.
@ Myriad...I felt the same about Clinton. I could not even understand when everyone was clamoring for her to quit. WHY? I wouldnt have. Why should she until it was futile and she well and truly lost. I find all politicians to be untruthful and opportunistic. That is not criteria by itself to disqualify because then we would probably not have politicians.
I have worked all my life and heard similar words said to me either openly or behind my back always. I did not love my children, I put my needs before theirs...I never REALLY took care of them etc etc. I think it is not true that all men and women who devote time to their careers/education/cause are necessarily neglecting other parts of their lives. They do it because they are sometimes driven to do so. I really cannot say what is truth with Ms Palin but since I have done the same I have to at least afford her a hearing.
But I watch her like a moth watches a fire burn and sizzle.....
I dont know if she is fascinating at all. Its simply that when and if I think of her negatively I also deep within seem to envy her. Envy her her guts, her survival instincts and her just simply being herself. I dont say she would be a good administrator or a good leader or anyhting. But as a human she has what it takes to simply survive.
ocularnervosa: My title (they gave such things) in my high school farewell was : Chameleon !! I was told that i adjust and change and melt and mould. and reach out towards success. We all had a good laugh, we were only 16! I am still the same and dont regret a moment. ANd your writing the word reminded me of it. Huh! how odd is that. that is nearly 36 years ago!!!
Thank you for your visit and much appreciated comments. This was a very difficult piece to write int he sense that I felt exposed and vulnerable. Being who I am, it is uncharacteristic yet true. An odd combination to say the least.
Which politician is not an opportunist or is humble? Its the vary nature of politics and public posts that must do away with those two qualities it seems. If you look back in history almost all political leaders lack the two. There are very very few modern politicians (actually i really cant think of any...right now) who dont fit.
But envy does not necessarily come out of admiration. It can be from simple observation of events or personalities without. Specially the things I ended up envying. It is easy to give a phenomenon a name and peg it down....tough to pin something as nebulous as charisma and chutzpah!