lunacy reins.. ha

JANUARY 8, 2012 12:55PM

"Racy" pic banned from yearbook... your opinion?

Rate: 29 Flag

 Sydney Spies, Durango, Colorado; her proposed yearbook shot

   The above linked ABC NEWS article via Yahoo news has currently, 28,220 comments. Essentially, Sydney wants to use THIS shot as her high school senior yearbook feature and the school is not having any part of it.

   Sydney's mom who was also the Durango high school slut queen of her generation has declared solidarity with her daughter. They plan to fight the yearbook committee's decision, even going as far as "to meet with a civil lawyer in Denver to review their daughter’s case. 

 

   I knew nothing of this great tabloid sensation until yesterday when I ran across the link at Joan H.'s facebook page. At last count the thread there had 63 comments, which facebookers will recognize as a lot... Joan H. (whom I adore, have no doubt of that) says in her 'status update' "I don't think this is a "racy" Senior picture, I just think it is a freakin' ridiculous Senior picture."

    And then the comments started.

   This one is fairly typical...

  " She looks like she didn't have time to stop and change on the way home from her stripper job."

   Playing the devil's advocate as I am apt to do, I commented " My question is who defines racy? We're still a Quaker dominated society? Cracks me up that anyone can pass judgement from on high over what the girl wears."

 

   Now, do I think, really, that the picture is appropriate for a high school yearbook? Uh, no I do not.

   Several said, "pretend it's your daughter."

   Believe me, I already did!

   Would MY daughter (don't have a daughter by the way, but...) ever be seen in the high school yearbook in the stripper get-up? No, no she wouldn't. Matter of fact, she wouldn't be allowed to leave the house at all 'til she was 21.

   My question for the readers here is, I suppose... why is it these kind of tabloid-ish stories draw so much attention and controversy? 

   I linked the below vid in Joan's comment thread...

   What do you think? 

 

Author tags:

sydney spies

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
They do draw the attention, don't they? I suspect because they deal with youthful sexuality and the prioritization of style over substance. This prioritization is lauded by some (in this case the girls own mother) and abhorred by others. Also, it is a prime example of the 'LOOK AT ME' culture in which we live - again, loved or despised depending on your orientation. I have harsh opinions about this myself. I'm sure you are familiar with the type of guy in pop culture being referred to as a douche bag. Pumped up pecs, covered in tats, a very tight T-shirt, spiked hair, sunglasses, etc. This is the female version of a douche bag. Only the outside matters. Puke.
Sheesh! What a tempest in a teapot. These days she's almost overdressed compared to the kids I see on the street every day. If that's the picture she wants to use and she's of legal age to make that decision (or has parental permission), who else's business is it?
.
My problem with the controversy is that they are calling it an infringement on their freedom of speech. The yearbook committee said they would print the picture elsewhere in the book but wanted a more classy picture for the official photo. So if these people win, if they get the photo as the official shot, where does it end? Does the next class go topless?

And before you call bullshit, it always gets more extreme. It may rebound eventually, but it always gets more extreme first.
Sydney's dad was last seen hiding out at the local VFW with a bottle..
Much ado about nothing, so frickin' what she isn't naked, she doesn't have any "naughty bits" exposed. Our culture is so twisted that the bar is set where some repressed asshole gets aroused by it. Needless to say that threshold must have been reached by some twisted pervert on the school staff.
Style over substance... no kidding. Sadly too, from what I remember, Sydney is the type of girl- the gorgeous HS cheerleader type maybe, that will blow out three or four kids in succession, by three or four "fathers" and be unrecognizable in ten years, while the "wallflower" type girls are now in full bloom and truly beautiful, inside and out.
Japan doesn't have this issue, nor does South Korea, nor does Taiwan. They are democracies, but they also have school uniforms. Kids there find free-expression through clothing outside of school. And East Asian fashion trends among youth aren't suffering in the least bit as a result. On the other hand, East Asian youth do much better in school. Perhaps its because their society enables them to focus more on academics and less on nonsense while in school?
Ah, Tr ig, you know how I feel about this young lady's choice for a YEARBOOK picture pose. I think the problem starts with crap like "Toddlers and Tiaras" (on A&E, home of "Hoarders" and other sensational shows I can't look away from,) and continues on in the way-too-early sexualization of girls. By the time they are Sydney's age, they are hoping for the cover of Playboy. (Cue up "What's the Matter With Kids Today." I'm officially old and the mother of a girl...
~r
oops, rated, of course.
My first question was, "Where the hell were THOSE kinda chicks in my high school???"...

Then I realized that she was so HAWT and sexy she obviously must be a lesbian...

So in other words, get your horn doggie eyes off her, dude! Anyone that attractive DEFINITELY plays for OUR team. (and no, she DOES NOT switch hit!)
I am firmly planted atop the fence here!
I think this kind of thing speaks to many of us, especially women, because we have a sort of sixth-sense when it comes to this kind of thing. There are times when someone naively strikes a pose or takes a picture that makes them look sexy or provocative and they don't see a problem. But I just know that is not the case here. And I think most people would agree with me. When I saw this story in the news, to be perfectly honest with you, my initial reaction was to laugh and blurt out, "Dumb slut!" I know that's offensive language, but there you go, that was my honest reaction. I do agree that it's not necessarily a slutty photo in terms of the clothes she's wearing, but the provocative pose and especially the fact that this girl intended and insisted that this be in her fricking high school yearbook, is what does it. Thinking about it further, I realize she may not be so dumb at all: thanks to her audacity, everyone knows this girl's name AND has seen her picture. It's even been in the international news. I wouldn't be surprised if she wants to go into modeling/acting/singing, etc. Publicity stunt achieved.
I'm sure I would call her a lesbian since her nubile self wouldn't give pimple faced be-spectacled pathetic ME the time of day.
All that is not really my issue though. Question is, why all the attention to this kind of crap when we have REAL issues to deal with in this country... this world?
What happened to the classy, classic head shots we had in our yearbooks? I think this is highly inappropriate; I'm a traditionalist about these kinds of things. I'm with the school - her official photo should be more sedate - it should be the same for everyone. I dread when my daughter is going in for the "photo shoot" that seems to be required of high school seniors these days. Ugh.
My guess is that her attire probably falls outside of the school's dress code which would seem to be a pretty easy place to draw the line.
I think you're all being a bit harsh on the girl myself.

I'll add Australia to Rwoo5g's list.
NOW, 29,395 comments at the linked yahoo/ABC piece. This is after all very important, right.
Sorry, I've been thinking about this since I left the comment and I want to clarify: For me, as for many people of my generation, there are multiple definitions of the word "slut". I have no problem with someone who has sex with multiple partners (as long as it's consensual); the meaning of "slut" I meant to evoke here is someone who flaunts her sexuality in a ridiculous way and is probably quite unpleasant to be around.
I wonder, (hello to all, including a few that rarely visit.. thanks) how many of the now nearly 30,ooo commenters at yahoo know that Obama just signed legislation making indefinite detention of ANY American citizen, without charge or even an explanation... LAW
in regards to my last comment which down't read exactly clearly...

http://rt.com/usa/news/obama-detention-defense-levin-635/
The sad part is that the girl in question, who looks very nice, thinks this is a classy picture. It does not look "racy" as much as emphasizing the blossom of her sexual allure, which may peak in the next few years. For girls like her, and their moms, that is their primary concern in life, and they are more or less over the hill at a young age. So, the picture itself is less sad about what it shows than what it represents, the dismal aspirations of a 17 year old girl in Durango. At this point, her senior year will probably be the highlight of her life and this would be, of all things, an appropriate way to memorialize it. Maybe the school should be more upset that they can't motivate their teens to think of any kind of better future for themselves, instead of what she is wearing in a book that will rarely be picked up in the years to come.
More than likely the school has a dress code, and this get-up would not pass muster. One problem I see with young people today is that they don't have an understanding of appropriateness. Would she wear this to graduation? No. Would she wear this to a wedding? No. Would she wear this to a job interview? No. There's a time and place for everything, and while this picture might go elsewhere in the yearbook, as the committee has proposed, it would stick out like a sore thumb in the senior photo section. There's a certain amount of dignity to senior pictures, as is appropriate for the occasion. The committee (which I'd bet includes students) is right to reject the photo for the senior section.

I also think if she were standing straight looking back over her shoulder she might have gotten away with the outfit. However, posing with her butt poked out like that sends a loaded message. It's interesting, too, that she's posed on the stairs. Getting that message has nothing to do with anyone's repressed sexuality; it's obvious when we see it elsewhere in the culture--in advertising, music videos, television--and it's obvious here.

Why do things like this draw attention? I think it's a clash of values, as desert_rat said. I, too, agree with Joan about where it all starts. The cult of celebrity has spilled down to toddlers. Everyone wants to be famous, everyone wants to be looked at, everyone wants to point at other people and say OMG. Frickin' TV.
And about the most repressive law ever passed in the United States, tr ig, too many people don't read. They hear things on TV and it sinks into their heads without contemplation. It's that fear thing that's been spread around to keep us in line. "If you don't have anything to hide, it shouldn't bother you." Yeah, right.
She looks great. Lovely. A lovely woman.
What is the f-ing issue?

Advise me, here, man, cuz I truly don’t know..
What is it? the way her back is sort of…arched?

Hey when the f. did we become a “quaker dominated society?”

I am so damn out of it, I gotta take a day to recover.
She looks great. Lovely. A lovely woman.
What is the f-ing issue?

Advise me, here, man, cuz I truly don’t know..
What is it? the way her back is sort of…arched?

Hey when the f. did we become a “quaker dominated society?”

I am so damn out of it, I gotta take a day to recover.
Alysa gives an interesting take on this:

“my initial reaction was to laugh and blurt out, "Dumb slut!" I know that's offensive language, but there you go, that was my honest reaction”



Mine, not.

So she gets a modelling gig and a rich lizardly boyfriend & lots of hedonistic fun.
God bless her. She has used the System.

Re. the system?


I only WISH it was Quaker……………….
WTF?

shit, sorry. delete AND edit me.
lol James... is that a stutter? No worries... I feel ya man
Only the guilty are offended, throwing rocks doesn't mean you're innocent! She's doing what she wants and harming no one. There's no real issue here nor is she "misguided" in any way, she doesn't bother to pretend our society is moral. So yeah, that's going to piss off all the hypocrites!

Everyone has got sluttiness in them, not showing it just makes you a liar to boot. All Wall Street traders should be forced to dress as strippers in an honest world. We live in a country that sends girls her age to be slaughtered in foreign lands for corporate profits. Killing and maiming our kids is OK if we perceive it benefits our selfish interests but by God don't let one of those little brats do what she wants!

Don't tell me there's outrage because we supposedly care so much about our kids in this country, nothing could be further from the truth.
Harry as usual sez it like I feel it:

“Killing and maiming our kids is OK if we perceive it benefits our selfish interests but by God don't let one of those little brats do what she wants!”


But harry gotta learn finesse, somehow? No, yes, yes, no..i am ambivalent re. harry…..


Ha! Stutter! Yeah, slut blonde goddesses bring that shit out in me, man.

Arg.

Damn sluts. Wish they were not so..ah..tender…………….
Again, what does this have to do with school?

We should have uniforms for school.

Barring that, the yearbook dress code should be the same as the school dress code. Which should be the same as a Supreme Court courtroom dresscode.
After reading/rereading some of these comments I'm starting to get pissed!

The chick is a VERY attractive young woman. She wants to reflect that in a picture that is apparently important to HER. That is her CHOICE!

Does it promote feminizism or advance the woman's movement? Of course not, but she not trying do do that. It's also not hurting any of you wannabe Puritan's either!

BTW, calling some chick a douchebag or a slut because you THINK she is based upon a pretty benign picture is rediculous!

Bottom line is she should get to do what she wants as long as its not hurting anyone and the government, the freakin yearbook committee AND y'all should get off her back, stay out of people's private lives & bedrooms and, as Dick Weasel pointed out, worry about more important crap!

P.S. To the Douche that thinks women need to dress like the Supreme Court: Burka much, dude??? :rolleyes:
Speaking of hypocrisy too... me, myself, I, Man Talk Now, James Emmerling, and many others are or have been pretty MALE sluts in the past. What do we get? Pats on backs and notches on belts. One more thing Amy, if Sydney IS a lesbian, it's only because she hasn't enjoyed, yet, 30 seconds of tr ig thunder..
LOL. They shouldn't dress like the court. Only like people going to court. Which is respectable.

Dressing like that is disrespectful in certain environments and distracting. There is a time and place for everything. Democracy means freedom. But freedom doesn't mean the freedom to do whatever you want, whenever you want. Even if you don't hurt others.

Should kids be allowed to masturbate in math class, provided they don't hurt anybody else? NO

Its distracting

I say, uniforms in public school. That solves the story.
What she thinks at this age will differ enormously once she becomes oh...say a grandmother and she looks back. We all look pretty good at her age in retrospect. I think the school is doing her a huge favor. She can post that pic on FB where it belongs.
This is going on practically next door to me. The school's dress code (like most of ours out here) requires shoulder straps at least an inch wide and no midriff to be showing. If Sydney's parents disagreed with that, it might have made more sense to challenge it at the beginning of the year, not after they spent a couple thousand dollars on senior pictures. There were very clear guidelines about what would be allowed in the yearbook photos. One goal of high school ought to be learning to read the instructions.

I'm sympathetic toward Sydney. She's only doing what society has encouraged our daughters to do, and I actually don't know anyone who looks back at high school yearbooks and thinks, "Wow, I made a really good choice that day, didn't I!"

However, I have very little sympathy for her parents, who apparently don't have any *real* civil-rights issues in their lives.
I agree. To equate this with a Civil Rights issue is insane. Malcolm X and others would see this girl as Bourgeois tripe, and nothing more
hm. gals in supreme court robes, yes, this is the topic?

lingerie is up to the woman, for underneath robe.

this girl, in this event,
will make hay while the sun shines,
then she will find her beauty fading, blah blah.
James: My argument was that people should dress the way they should for court. NOT that they should dress like judges, but that they should dress as spectators and litigants should dress when they appear in court. Thanks.
I seen Joan's status at FB(yep, gotta lubs her!!! Otherwise, she'll hunt you down like a wild beast and make you lubs her with sunshine and cupcakes, where you don't want sunshine and cupcakes!!! Teehee!!) and did what I usually do with such things, I didn't click! No sir, no how!!

:D

But since you placed the pic on your post, I'll comment, can we see the mom's high school photo??? :D

And no, I wouldn't allow my daughter to leave the house till she was 30!! EEK!!!

But that's my oldness coming through before my time!! And luckly, no daughters!! Though I did want to lock my nieces up till they were 30, but too late, my oldest is fixing to make me a great-uncle now for the 3rd time(baby is a coming soon!!!)
She should have tits if she wants to wear that top in public.

They should have photo standards in place for sr. pics (i.e., head & shoulders only, x amount of space) so they don't have these issues. It's not her yearbook, it is the school's yearbook and they are allowing her to be in it. She can choose not to be if she so prefers. She can publish her own book if she likes. That's where her free speech comes in. It doesn't mean you can do/say anything any damn time you want.
RIGHT ON, KERI H! Who the hell does she think she is! Attractive women who don't have HUGE bovine udders daren't wear anything nice!

And damn right, she doesn't have aright to look attractive in her yearbook! If she can't be a pimply faced jock or geek she should be BANNED!

While we're at it, We also need to ban all the queer kids cuz they look so GAY, and the minority kids cuz they look so COLORED and what about all those poor kids that look so UNDERPRIVILEGED too!

Damn straight, sister! Only wannabe burka wearers and nerdy Xians belong in the figgin yearbook!

[/sarcasm]
Speaking as a former high school yearbook staffer, I feel the yearbook staff made exactly the right decision. The underclassmen cannot choose what photo gets run in the pages of alphabetized headshots, and neither can the seniors. The seniors need to go to the photography studio chosen by the yearbook and sit for a formal portrait if they want to be included in the yearbook. If they choose not to purchase any photos, that is entirely okay--they still get their photo in the yearbook. If they choose not to be in the yearbook, that's okay too, but most (including my kids) choose to be included and just not pay for additional pix. The kids don't have to buy the yearbook, either.

I see that the yearbook editors are perfectly fine with her submitting the photo if she wants one of those paid "congrats graduate" ads that a lot of the yearbooks now have. We didn't have that option in the 1970's. It's a good option, and isn't that expensive.

To me, it would be like the kid and her mom getting outraged because they can't provide their own driver's license or passport photos.
Currently, just less than 33,000 comments at the yahoo link...

Reminds me of the Anthony trial. Tabloid always trumps
Snippy, some schools, mine included, have the seniors supply a picture for the yearbook. We liked it because we got to pick it for a change. That may be the case here.

So much discussion here. Burqas, male sluts, and tr ig thunder. Huh.
Keri H.. Ass trumps tits, for me at least. If I hired a hooker from an escort agency, and it happened to be young Sydney that showed up at my hotel door, wearing that very outfit (if you don't like being called a hooker then why are you wearing THE UNIFORM?) I doubt I would send her packing. Yes, I would show her the thunder, and the lightning.

My point... why all the attention when there are actual newsworthy items we should be paying attention to?

Carry on! Thanks for all the comments.. This, at least, fun...
You can look attractive without your ass in position for a pumping. Sad that Amy doesn't think so.
I commented and then looked at comments. Holy moly, Trig, you're getting a lot of attention with this.

Why do people look at this infotainment, and not know the latest on our habeas corpus rights? Good question, one which Neil Postman covered in Amusing Ourselves to Death. I wish he were still alive to update that book...it was prescient. But notice, Trig--you "bit," and publicized the story, and we are commenting. I'm guessing that for a lot of us, it's needed escape from poisonous headlines and unrelenting bad news. It's why I'll be watching The Hobbit as soon as Netflix has it available for streaming, and why I enjoyed Lost in Austen, and why I'm reading Elizabeth Gaskell's North and South after having seen the miniseries. Sometimes we just need an escape, either through comic relief, or through hooting with laughter at human folly, or through taking a vacation to Middle Earth.
She's a product of the present culture, so I don't judge her. But it makes me sad that a young woman wants to be remembered this way in her high school yearbook. She's very pretty. There would be so many ways to photograph her that would capture her youth and beauty, without being so cheaply sexual. The worst thing about the photo is that it lacks any nuance or imagination. Kind of like a lot of high-schoolers, I guess.
Phyllis, thanks for explaining. I wasn't aware that some schools allow students to supply their own photo. My guess is that this school's yearbook requested a headshot or something along that line of formal portrait. If a lot of other kids will be seen in full-length portraits, then perhaps this one wouldn't have stuck out so much. Er, poor choice of words?

Alysa's comment may be spot-on though. What a great publicity stunt! If she intends to sing, dance, or be the next Paris Hilton, she's managed to corral a load of free publicity and, if she uses her 15 minutes of fame advantageously, may end up quite rich. Only in America!
Sorry, tr ig. I know what a serious guy you are, but I've been watching the Broncos. I'll worry about indefinite detention later!
I don't think it's a very good "official" photo for editorial reasons. If
phyllis45 is correct and the editorial committee offered a place somewhere else, than OK for another place.

Odd body poses are a part of high school goofball culture, like making funny faces, kick me signs or putting on Halloween costumes. I don't think any of those would be appropriate for the portrait section. It's like upstaging someone in theater or monopolizing conversation; it's a form of public rudeness.

But they might be OK in a section devoted to high school students acting out. Personally, I think hers is a tragic pose that people are going to find depressing. It could have been a funny pose satirizing society's silly puritanical ideas of sex if she had played it with a self aware facial expression. But she looks like she trying to be serious about all of this, communicating the bogus artificial "sexuality", that is part of the commercialization of sex one finds everywhere in corporate advertising.

This pose is about selling a product in a sick patriarchal society. She's not really selling sex. She's selling her willingness to shill products by posing her body. In its own weird way, it is a form of resume. The product could be anything from a porn film to a car depending on how she evaluates the "offers" that are sure to come her way.

It does tend to be a short career path though, like professional football for example. I hope she plans to continue her education and prepares for the day when her poses no longer attract marketing departments.
And this just in

Jenn is pregnant... with twins.

Welcome Bob. Deep thoughts. Adroit analysis. Welcome

busy watching shameless on show time w my gf... and now i'm typing like jane gtg thanks everyone
I like the idea of everyone submitting their own photo for senior pictures. Those photographers have a real racket going and the prices are going up all the time. Can't we all just be the natural sexual beings that we are? I would have loved to have a unique photo in my yearbook instead of those stupid head shots.

I was a sorority house mother for two years. I had my head shot in the line up with them. What a production to get everyone in a photo and in the end they all looked like barbies anyway.

Long Live Unique Sexy People. We need more of this...not less! America is full of prudes and Im so tired of it.
I can only say...UGH! I pray for my daughters, daily.
First of all, Trig Thunder (I like that!) please allow me to give you a hearty whack on the back for both decrying the publicity this girl's picture is getting as well as capitalizing on it for purposes of your blog. How long did you stare at her picture before you wrote this - about 30 seconds, I'm guessing.

Must we always agonize over politics and unemployment and universal healthcare? I think Sydney is giving us all a welcome respite from the relentless gloom and doom in the news these days. What's more interesting to me is how judgmental everyone is, immediately labeling her a slut, a douche bag, and the "type of girl who will blow out three or four kids in succession, by three or four "fathers"..."

I wonder why no one thought to ask what her GPA is or what she wants to do when she graduates. But I will say, I don't care for the yellow skirt or the background. If that were my senior picture (if only), I'd have worn black leather pants and posed on the climbing ropes in the gym. With the hot football coach who my slutty best friend propositioned at the end of the semester (he doubled as a history teacher and gave her a B; she left a note in his mailbox that read "for a roll in the hay, would you give me an A"). She got the A but wouldn't spill the beans, that tramp.
Everybody left my thoughts or pieces of them in the comments, so I'll just reiterate how sad it is to see someone so young believing that her greatest asset is youth and beauty, insuring her an unhappy and discontented life. It is unfortunately, a woman's thing, and probably, beyond that, nature's way. Creatures display. Often it's the boys, especially in the bird kingdom. Humans err in believing that culture and civilization has elevated us from our critterhood. My two cents, as a big old monkey gal who knows it.
Yes, true.. I decried the sensationalism and then used (attempted to at least) the same to get attention. ME! Look at ME!!!

What IS Sydney's GPA? What are her aspirations?

Very good questions that nobody bothered to think, let alone ask (except mad dog and snip dog)... myself included. I'm sure she's a very smart and nice little slut... I MEAN GIRL!! *slaps self*

Yes too, I GET that the "real news" is depressing and we need distractions. I'd say now, after a bit of thought, that I 'm ok with that, as long as we remain aware at least, that the totalitarian boot is poised over our collective necks.

Five dollar cash reward to anyone that finds me a picture of Sydney's mom.
Most Likely to Declare Bankruptcy by Thirty
You are shameless. Look at you, changing your picture - AGAIN - and not just your picture but your name. Are you planning on launching a second career starring in pornos? That would explain not just the name but the reference to the boot poised above your neck.

(Is that Amy in the picture with you? I hope she's not your co-star - unless it's a snuff film!)
"The totalitarian stiletto of an Iowa dyke" ??

Assuming it's ME that get's snuffed in your fantasy film mad dog..
Here ya go, Trig. Sydney's mom.

http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20120109/NEWS01/701099941/Yearbook-photo-flap-on-Today-Show
Thanks Lonesome! Must have got her looks from her dad
Hey! Where's my $5? See how you are?
Looks like the acorn doesn't fall far from the tree when it comes to publicity-seeking. Here's a close-up of Mom from a November issue of the Durango Herald, about her coming out as a lesbian:

http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20111121/COLUMNISTS04/711219956/-1/s

As we say here in Montana, she looks like she's been rode hard and put away wet (for you non-Western folks, that is NOT a sexual reference!).

Do I get to split the $5 with High Lonesome?
montanarose: @your link- "The article requested can not be found! Please refresh your browser or go back. (DU,20111121,COLUMNISTS04,7112199,AR)."

Also should note, High Lonesome's was a vid clip when I CLEARLY asked for a PICTURE. The Lincoln is right here on the table waiting to be snatched..
She looks like a young woman who thinks she is hot...and I agree with her. She is hot.

Normally I do not like "putting too much effort into it"...but the picture seems okay to me...although the first time I looked at it, I thought it was a black strip photo-shopped over a naked top. (It isn't!)

If she likes it...the book should allow it. Her mother likes it...and wants it in there.
Frank, thanks... but WHY such a drain on our collective attention?
Tr ig, the "Why" is because she is the perfect and very attractive poster child for those of us who disagree with governmental oppression (in her case a bunch of Puritanical asshats on a yearbook committee) and the fundie wannabe control freaks that both agree with them and who would gladly support people just like them in repressing even more of us, based on their warped religious based ethics.

P.S. Tr ig Thunder is an apt name. After all, thunder is nothing more than a loud noise that only impresses chickens and scares sheep!
Bob hit the nail on the head calling this her "resume". Look for her in a reality show or advertisement coming your way soon!
Amy, a high school yearbook committee is not BIG BROTHER.

Obomba, the great half white hope is big brother.

Blue thanks for the input
MontanaRose's link works just fine. Either you're doing something wrong or you're lying to avoid paying the $5 ... I have my suspicions.

http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20111121/COLUMNISTS04/711219956/-1/s
Cut and paste
Is cool that we have something in common though Amy,
that being, Sydney's image above makes us both horny.

Do you think tr ig lightning would be more appropriate?
This is tame by today's standards, I think, although I don't know if it's "yearbook appropriate." Girls mostly have slutty role models so I guess this seems normal to lots of them, don't know. I don't have a daughter either, trig, but if I did, she would not be wearing this get-up. R.
Maybe it's me, or my computer Suzi.. yours' no workie either,and believe me I'm curious, not only to see her Lisa Kudrow looking self in a still, but also to read the coming out as lesbian story.
I am truly sorry I had any part in promoting this stupid story. My ire, however, is directed at people like Matt Lauer on the Today show who actually brought them to New York to *discuss* the issue. Journalism at its finest.
Ah Joanie... "the issue."
No problem, look how much fun we've had with the issue
EK, you're saying I'm a slutty role model? THANKS!
The only thing I find hard to believe is that this post has gotten 3202 views and received so many comments and ratings Trig.

Who woulda thunk..???
No, her issues with the year book committee isn't on the same level as Obama's shredding of the constitution or the republican's assault on women, but it IS a fine example of the same fundie thought processes being pervasive throughout ALL societal stratas.

And yes, Tr ig Lightening is better because it works on a couple of levels. On the scientific level lightening is just a bunch of static and on the sexual level "fast as lightening" sure fits!
trig, you're my slutty role model!! But I'd rather be the whore that I am then a slut, whores get paid!! Always remember that!! ;D
tr ig, no, not you (LOL), I mean Christine Aguilera, Britney, et al. Ha ha! Maybe this is the wave of the future. I guess if the girl is an honors student, she should be able to wear whatever she wants, but that would be unfair too. never mind me, just rambling now.
Heehee - Back when Tiberias was Emperor the SCHOOL arranged "Picture Day". Each student had their pic taken by a photographer hired by the school and THAT picture was the one used in the year book. None of this "bring your ownpicture" bullshit. And if you mised picture day you were listed in the year-book as offcially "camera shy".

But hey I'm just an old crank - get off my lawn!!

:-) / r
I don't see this as a matter of propriety but rather as a matter of appropriate. From the article I read, the student editorial board of the yearbook is the group which put the "Ki-bosh" on the photo and told her she could run the photo in the advertising section where apparently a lot of kids put pictures too but not in the section where the typical senior portraits are printed.
We're all old and senile now (at least in our kids' eyes) but some parents would be able to get the kid to use their brain a bit better on this by suggesting "what if you looked at my senior yearbook and I was dressed like that for my portrait?" That might tend to do it.
Amy.. I can be slow as molasses' descent down a "hill" in Kansas in winter, or fast as a dildo attachment on an over-amped sawzall, but I get your sentiment and thank you once again. Curious though, did you see mad dog's reference to snuff films above?

Mission- 3200 views? The yahoo link had nearly forty thousand comments last I looked! As is appropriate... I freaking suppose

Tink.. whore's get paid? Last whore I ran upon asked for taxi fare and a tip... I gave her a dollar- said "here's a tip.. the bus stop is just down there a mile or so on Broadway."

Erica... ha. Christine Aguillera and Britney got nothing on me and the Kardashians
On the 'popularity' tab above the title here on OS Trig.
Don't have a clue as to Yahoo...
Just saying...
torrito LMAO.. "Walt Kowalski: Yeah, Yum-yum. Yeah. Nice girl. Nice girl, very charming girl. I talked with her, yeah. But you, you just let her walk out of here with the Three Stooges. And you know why? 'Cause you're a big, fat pussy. Well, I gotta go. Good day, puss-cake."... LOVE that movie!

Walter, thanks. No kidding, back in the day. In retrospect, I wish I'd have been camera shy, but no matter. I don't get the whole "I'll contact an attorney" attempt at a hammer over the little yearbook committee's editorial authority.
Yes, I did see Mad Dog's comments. However, much like Kim the Kantankerous Kiwi, I usually can't stomach reading all of her posts or comments. I think we both suffer from silicone/Joey Ramone lookalike allergies, you see.

Anyways, I'll just assume Mad Dog Margaret is upset because she believes you were in the Navy and didn't have sex with her. You obviously would be the (only) ONE that got away!


P.S. Why did your GF feel the need to wear a mask in your Av picture??? (not that I blame her... Just curious!)
Apparently the yearbook committee and school had guidelines for photos which this shot did not meet. Why didn't they just crop it to a head and shoulders shot and plug it in?
Amy.. sigh. You are incorrigible

ccdarling: thx and read thru comments when you get time :)
She had every right to choose the photo, but the YB committee had the right to say no too. And NO its not a violation of her freedom of speech! What a load. LOL
We are in agreement then Miko :)
The pics don't offend me and I don't find anything offensive or inappropriate about what this attention whore is wearing.

American has so many uptight personalities and this is particularly disturbing to some of us who understand the fine line between good taste and indecent exposure, particularly with minor children who are scantily clad are exploited by adults.

She's not a freaking criminal. She has, however, violated the school's dress code and this includes her photographs appearing in the school's yearbook.
Belinda T. thanks and laughing here..
Do tell, if you please, why all the attention to "what this attention whore is wearing?"
In a word? Ratings.

Ratings bring in viewers' attention to issues on sexuality and our freedoms to express ourselves. The FCC band camp is run much like the doofi at the UN. ;)
Did anybody scream bloody hell when Jackson's wardrobe malfunctioned? Yup. Every damn ultraconservative on our planet who witnessed this horrific act of vulgarity in the presence of innocent impressionable minds prattled on endlessly and look how long that story lasted.

Meh. If this girl feels comfortable in her own skin, good on her. Confidence is sexy! Just ask Pamela Anderson.
My question... why do we care? Real problems go un-noticed in the news. Miss confident gets all the press
Why do we [society] care? I think it has much to do with our societal core values. I've always been a firm believer that perception is everything. Some might opine she's fashionista and I would argue with them. Others have inuendoed she's a brainless slut. That sounds totally ludicrous to someone like me. I think she knows exactly what she's doing and so does her mother and so does Matt and his comrades. Testing, testing, testing...
My honest opinion re this young woman is: don't judge a book by its cover. Did it ever occur to the majority of people watching this young woman that she is anything other than what some label her as. Why condemn her without the benefit of getting to know her in lieu of trial by media moguls whose only interest at the end of each day is bringing in big bucks by drawing in audiences who I think are nothing short of hypocrites.