
This is the Free Press 3000 typewriter. It has very sharp thumb tacks for keys. It was designed for those who have what it takes to be a writer.
Wanna take it out for a spin?
Are you tough enough to express yourself? To write what you think? To write what you feel? To suffer the slings and arrows of those who oppose your thoughts? Your ideas? Your ideals? Are you tough enough to get bloodied up for your convictions? Are you tough enough to be a writer?
Then why do you close your comments?
Every now and then, I run into a post on Open Salon in which a Blogger posts something controversial or starts a war. In an effort to avoid confrontation, the writer uses the “Comments are now closed” function to prevent others from commenting.
The writer does this for a variety of reasons: they are afraid of a backlash, they realize they just created a firestorm with no way of knowing how to put it out, or they are afraid of other bloggers writing snarky comments on it just to be snarky. Notice that the main motivator here is “fear” or “being afraid”.
The Editors sometimes use the Comments Closed function when they do an Open Call because they are using the Open Call as an assignment for Bloggers to post something on their own blog not to leave a 10,000 word manifesto in the Open Call’s comments field. Apparently, some Open Salon Bloggers don’t get the Open Call concept and write their response to it in the comments sections so I see why the editors use this function.
However, some people use it as a cowardly way of writing something and not having to defend it. Therefore it is a form of censorship because it prevents a dissenting opinion to be heard.
A dissenter could easily write a post countering the Blogger’s opinion in question, and reference the original post by copying & pasting that post’s URL into his or her dissenting post. This counter-post is still being censored because it puts distance between the original post and the counterpoint. Even though a reader (of the counter-post) will be able to easily view the original post by clicking the URL, most people will be too lazy to do just that.
Writers are risk-takers. Whenever you put pen to page, or keystroke to paper or pixels, you are taking a chance especially when you publish it. The primary chance you are taking is “will people like or hate my work?” The second chance is “will I enrage or enlighten people?” And, third is, “can I handle the counter-attacks?”
So if you are going to write, especially something controversial, you must be prepared to bloody your keypad, your paper, your screen and your precious ego with your own blood and avoid using the “Comments are now closed” function.
Don’t even get me started on Bloggers who delete comments.
Image source: The original source was from a calendar a vendor gave me over ten years ago. The calendar was full of compelling and thought-provoking images some with or without text. After that year was up, I kept this image and mounted in on a board. I keep it in my cubicle at work. Why? I’m in advertising.
I cannot find the original source of this image. I cannot remember who the vendor was. If anyone knows anything about its origins, please contact me so I can give it its proper credit.


Salon.com
Comments
great post. i hope you get more discussion!
However, I also hate it when people post open-ended attacks and then close comments. Like yesterday's "You know who you are" post without any explanation whatsoever. It's kind of like hitting a baseball without giving the other team a chance to catch it - what's the point?
I am THAT person. I close comments if I get bored. ha!
No, really. I seriously do what I want to do over there. If people don't like it, too bad.
A blog belongs to the blogger. If s/he feels it's being taken over as a free for all, it is also her/his prerogative to close and/or delete the comments .
~R~
I'm capable of defending my writing, but usually I'm not inclined to explain why I've written what I've written. Everyone, including readers, brings their own experience to a piece; no one writes or reads free of personal experience (aka, in some cases, baggage). You can't change how someone else has experienced something.
As usual, what people write in their comments reveals more about them than about the blogger or the post on which they're commenting. Once you've made your point, move on. Neither side is likely to win an argument here. Some of the exchanges I've seen are devisive, if not downright vicious--not likely to convince anyone into accepting the other viewpoint. People can become so obsessed with being right (and we all think we are) that disagreements turn into attacks. If that happened on a post of mine, would I delete comments or turn them off? I hope not.
LOVE the image you posted with this.
If you close them before you post..then you invite NO FEEDBACK...good or bad.
If open..all open I say
Fortunately, I get great commenters who may disagree or not, but who usually do not get publicly rude and ugly. Plus, they're smart as hell.
Otherwise, folks can backstab me to death or talk about me like a dog in private messages that never get to my mailbox. If that happened, I might come after them and start Word War IV.
It's a good thing to be slightly scary as hell, and to set some personal standards for what goes on in ones own blog in an open forum.
It is also a good thing to let others work their issues as they need to in their own blogs.
Otherwise, this is all just entertainment. We give it. We get it. Sometimes we vent. That's all.
That said, bottom line, at the end of the day, ipso facto and the aforementioned heretofore, I believe that if a blogger wants to feel like king or queen of his or her blog, more power to him or her. But I quickly lose interest in the person and his or her blog if it appears the blogger is an ass with little or no redeeming qualities in his or her writing. I've stumbled onto a few here in my short tenure, and have cut them loose to work their tyranny on others to their hearts' content. almost not rated for getting my shorts in a knot
The typewriter is a great photo.
Pavanne, Thanks! Stick with me kid and you'll learn things, and keep your kitchen door wide open.
Kathy, thank you two times.
B. Strangely, yes there those that delete the box after Pandora has opened it. It all boils down don't start something if you can't finish it. BTW,ty for brining up my time on OS, I wasn't sure if it was Jan. or Feb.
In the past, I have deleted my posts that I thought were frivolous and did not cause controversy. Like my very first post, the one about the robot urinal. Or music videos that I snagged from YouTube or jokes that I recycled. But none of them were thought-provoking.
Dr. Susanne Freeborn, Bloggers are free to do what they want on their blogs, but by using the tactics I mentioned and a few others you are creating you are silencing the voice of others.
Walter, that's the point! If you put it out there you have to realize that people will not always like your POV. It's like the kid who makes fun of everyone and when he/she gets teased goes crying to his/her mommy or teacher.
Damion Chaplin, rule away in your own Private Idaho. How uncanny you should mention "that" post.
Odette Roulette, interesting point. I just wear them out by not replying to the comments. Eventually, the die out.
Scanner, true but even idots have a right to comment.
CrazeCzar, ty for the lesson, but I have been here for over a year and I am all too familiar with the way things run around here. BTW, the fact that you haven't run into me before is a testament to the my lowly botto-feeder status here on Open Salon.
Susan Mihalic, your first point matches my overall point and the image I used. If you want to be a writer, you need to have a thick skin. BTW, typos are welcomed on my blog.
Caroline Hagood, ponder away! It's nice to know I'll be in a pretty-bright, pretty young lady's thoughts. Just don't tell my wife.
B. Strangely, thanks for watching my back.
Mission, I like yor way better. Will there be lemonade?
Xenonlit XL, you're right for the most part this is just entertainment.
Bonnie Russell, which idiot...err..blogger might that be?
Matt Paust, I like the feature that the blogger can only delete comments on his or her posts. It makes the commentators think before they send.
Shiral, good point, but you could have just ignored them. They eventually would have gotten the point.
Davyboy, huh?
Xenonlit XL, thanks for watching my back and the compliment.
Aunt Mabel, the voice of reason,seriously. I still think one should always be open for dialog.
John Blumenthal, are you kidding? Your comments on a bottom-feeders blog like mine is worth gold.
The comments lines are still (and will remain) open folks.
The choice to edit our blogs are options to me and anyone else. My blog is my virtual real estate. But like some others, I generally steer clear of controversial subjects (though some folks know how to make pretty much ANYTHING into an argument). And who's to say what is provocative or not? Censorship? Nah - just expression of styles. And folks - let's face it - most of what we're blogging about or commenting about is not going to swivel the earth on its axis.
Thinking it was in response to this ;)
And you have a good point. Alas, when I read "someone has left a comment on your blog!" I turn into one of Pavlov's dogs and have to go rushing off to find out what they said.
Most of the time, the LAST thing I want to do is discourage anyone from commenting!
Amanda Gulledge, I take it wasn't.
kjfoieuoi uoiuoiu, u r da first spambot to visit my blog. Greetings! I see you bring gifts with price tags.
Shiral, I read all the comments on my post, but when they start getting too weird I just wear them down by not recognizing them.
The comments lines are still open folks.
Bellwether Vance, I'm after the ones that open the box and run away.
It does make me laugh when I see how some bloggers will make a fairly controversial point and then get all whacked out when someone challenges them.
And I've got to say that the the Agent 86 (Maxwell Smart) dead ringer pic pose is awesome. Keep on trudgin'.
Kit, no one is barging into your living room, but when you put something out there for all to read you should at least hear them out before you shut them out.
BTw, Dobermans are afraid of me.
Censorship is a slippery word, trudge - in a sense, every publisher who selects what to print and what not to print, every editor who makes the tiniest change in copy, is censoring.
These sorts of "censorship" I don't mind so much - it's just a reality. The censorship that does sort of agitate me, though, is when someone asks me a question and then rings me out because I dare to answer it differently than he wants me to.
Just because you don't delete a post doesn't mean you're not censoring. It's one thing to banter our ideas about - it is quite another thing to summarily discount another person because they disagree with you.
And what is amusing to me is that pragmatically I HAVE agreed with you inasmuch as I have personally never deleted a post (except, since I first commented on your blog here, I did go and delete one of those spam-ads. Hey. I am no purist!). All's I'm saying is we have the right to delete if we want to. And if this makes me a censor, well, I can live with that, I reckon.
I'm thinking you may not be quite as open as you want us to believe.
I agree with you - if I write something on my blog and leave the comments open, I DO want to see what folks say. And as I say, I've still got the old inflammatory comments up. My only point is that I think it's okay if I do delete comments if I decide someone is being vicious to other folks who comment or if he/she is blatantly trying to derail the conversation.
Well, I didn't mean to stuff so many words on your comments. I appreciate your indulgence! For all the fluff, I think you and I are probably more in agreement than not.
first, you argued that there is nothing wrong with closing comments or deleting contentious posts. then you argued that allowing every comment to stand was akin to letting people barge into your living room... but this is common real estate. salon owns open salon, and we're all here at their pleasure. personally, i blog so i can have interesting conversations with strangers, and i do this with the knowledge that i might just get a tongue-lashing... but i would rather have that feedback than feel like i shouted into the void with no criticism.
finally, you whip out the weirdest definition of censorship i've ever heard, "The censorship that does sort of agitate me, though, is when someone asks me a question and then rings me out because I dare to answer it differently than he wants me to."
that ain't censorship friend, that's called discussion.
and that's why i kept coming back to the post. the comments are always my favorite part of any post. if he'd deleted yours, i wouldn't find it nearly as compelling.
I closed comments (temporarily) on one occasion to all of my posts, because I planned to be away for a while. Someone sent me a PM accusing me of censorship. Otherwise, I’m pretty much an open book. The personal attacks have been minor, but I have had others hijack my post to conduct their personal flame wars (not cool). My personal preference is to leave the trash right where it is, for all to see. It often says more about the visitors than the tenant. For me, it’s simply not that deep. I hang out on OS; but I live in the real world.
when I first starting blogging I accidentally deleted myself in error so it's not in my destiny to be an all powerful deleting blog whoring queen.
besides, I've taken to wearing the poet's bonnet. nobody wants to beat up a poet. it's like bitchslapping a mime. you want to, but it's so wrong. so my blog is a nice place. I serve tea and cookies. I say thank you.
Censor --"an official who examines books, plays, news reports, motion pictures, radio and television programs, letters, cablegrams, etc., for the purpose of suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds."*
Notice the keywords are "suppressing" and "other grounds".
*Source: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/censor