
I steer away from most political debate, as I find that in almost every case, it too quickly devolves into name-calling and character-assassination. Most of us just can’t seem to help ourselves, taking the path of least resistance that leads to the same mud-slinging tactics we’ve come to tolerate, even encourage, from our political honchos. The crass behavior and sense of intolerance that once would have been considered unthinkable is now heartily embraced by opposing sides of a hot-bed of issues. The old saw, I have met the enemy, and he is us, comes to mind.
I long for a simpler, gentler time; one that is constrained by civility, compassion and a sincere desire to focus more intently on similarities than on differences. I wish for a time when our differences didn’t divide us so sharply, but instead provided the impetus for a united push for solutions. We seem to have adopted the attitude of my way or the highway as our rallying cry. Who wins with that refrain as the backdrop for every discourse? No one, of course. No one wins. But, we are all about winning, about being the best, the brightest, the most, and the biggest. In that realm, someone has to be the winner, and someone has to be the loser.
Is it our extreme sense of independence as a country, birthed from our forefathers at the founding of this country, which has led us to this point? Have we come to this place of deep divide because of our determination to outwit, outlast, outplay? Have we forgotten how to link our arms and move forward in unison to confront the issues that now threaten to topple the biggest, best and brightest country in the world, as we have proudly labeled ourselves? My fear is that the answer to that question is a resounding YES!Now, having defined from whence I come, I am compelled to define myself. Who am I within the complicated framework of that which holds me captive in its bosom, the land of my birth? Who am I? Does my adherence to certain political beliefs or a particular moral code set me at odds with my fellow man? My answer to that would most certainly be that it does. Has it become more important that we think alike, believe alike and walk perfectly in step than the fact that we share certain basic common denominators? Do we place more emphasis on our differences than we do on our likenesses? God help us, I believe we do. Much to our detriment, I believe that indeed we do.
It has been said that those who stand for nothing will fall for anything. A cute, quaint axiom to be sure, but behind those simple words stands a great truth. For myriad reasons, we have become a nation of finger-pointers; one that is so caught up in the act of pointing out the faults and foibles of others that we have neglected to develop our own foundations. We can so easily identify what makes others weak or wrong or misguided. Can we chronicle our own beliefs or stances with the same gusto? For that matter, can we admit to our own failings? Are we willing to do that, thereby risking our own vulnerability to create a meaningful dialogue? Have we lost the capacity to display humility, show grace or extend generosity of spirit?
I choose to believe that we have not lost the better parts of ourselves beneath all the blaming, chest-pounding and casting of aspersions. Humility, grace and generosity of spirit are still in abundant display when we interact one-on-one, when one of our own reaches out with a hurting heart. More often than not, there is a rush to comfort, not a rush to judgment. It is those times when we allow ourselves to look at the other person’s humanity, instead of a political stance, instead of a moral code, instead of a particular belief system; those are the times when we exhibit the grace and mercy that keep us from becoming rigid automatons. Generosity of spirit effectively prohibits us from assigning blame or dissecting the behavior of a person who has trusted enough to make themselves vulnerable to us.
If only we could remember to reach into those parts of ourselves when confronted with someone ascribing to differing ideologies. But, we are a passionate people with fervent beliefs. It can be a good thing to be willing to fight for our beliefs, as long as we do not decimate our opponent in the process.
Back to my original premise: Who am I?
I am a person of faith, faith that has been tested and tried and tempered over the years, faith that has weathered being put away on a shelf for long periods of time and then taken down, dusted off and tried on again. I am generally conservative in my political leanings, but I cringe at the thought of being associated with those who identify themselves as conservatives and hold a take-no-prisoners, unyielding, uncompromising position that leaves no room for questions too big for a pat answer, or for the possibility that every thought in their head is not unflinchingly holy and correct. I am a fifty-three year old woman who has been through the fire and lived to tell the tale. I am no longer rigid and unbending in my beliefs, although I was those things at one point in my life. I try to choose grace and mercy over judgment and piety at every opportunity. I believe in the power of love, as well as the transforming power of forgiveness. I believe in second, third, and even fourth chances – how many of us got it right the first time around, anyway? I know that there are more things I have yet to learn than there are things I have already learned. I do not have all the answers, although I do have a few and I hold firm to those.
Finally, and I think, most importantly, I believe that we are all more alike than we are different. And I believe that we have lost our way, and found ourselves on a path that encourages us to wave those differences like a banner. I believe it is time to turn around and chose the other path – the one that leads to reconciliation and understanding. The path that unites us, instead of separating us.
Now you know who I am. Who are you?
Links to posts answering this OC:


Salon.com
Comments
My personal opinion? You knocked this thing out of the park my friend.
Torman - I absolutely cannot wait to read your post in answer to this OC. And I am deeply honored by your comment. Your opinion is always of the highest importance to me, and this time is no exception. Thank you, thank you, dear David.
If only more of us could embrace this more often, myself included! Who am I? Wow...that is what I'm trying to figure out. Not sure I could write it as poetically as you.
I do not think i will live to see it either.
Opinions are never listened to these days.. It's their way or the highway.
Rated with hugs
Linda - Yes, love and compassion - that's definitely you. 100%. I love that about you. I didn't see a lot of it for a long time either, but my view has changed and now I'm finding it among the ruins. Challenging, but worth it. ((Big hugs)) back to you.
Your piece resonates strongly UB, but what I quoted above is what jumped out at me the most. You've affirmed something I've been believing for a long time, deeply buried within swaying between my birthright and my self sought identity. Magnificent writing, thank you.
♥R
I think we've always been divided politically, but it's gotten out of mind now because we have a political media that's ranting 24/7 and we can't escape it unless we turn off all our devices and throw away the newspapers. We end up spending most of our demonizing and very little empathizing. I wish I could say that I think it will get better, but my confidence is shaky.
Cranky - okay, well you're not alike. How's that? And I suspect that we are in for a long haul of the same old stuff, but, hey, a girl can dream, can't she?
I hope you get better responses than mine on this! Like you, I'm interested in how people see themselves.
Well done.
R of course.
For all of us eh? Even if we don't answer the OC ;).
Rated for meaty bits.
I have faith in God and the people in our country. I also have a tremendous amount of hope.
Thanks for posting this well thought out essay!!
rated
Gabby - I guess it's easier for some people to "put themselves out there" than it is for others - as evidenced by the small amount of responses to both your and my OC calling for self-examination. Ah, well...
Tom - don't worry, I won't. I have my hands full just keeping myself on track. :)
Buffy - Now your response to this OC is one I would definitely want to read. Please do let me know when you post one, dear friend. And thank you. xoxo
Matt - I guess when you fall to the bottom, you have two choices. You can either stay down there and drown or you can struggle back up to the surface. In that respect, it's a simple matter of survival. The trick is in making the decision to survive.
Seer - I hope you'll answer the OC - I'll be looking forward to it.
Susie - thank you for all your kind words and for such an insightful comment. It's gratifying to know my post spoke to you so strongly. Thank you!
Satori - I love your inner metaphor! Thanks for answering the OC
Caroline - I look forward to reading your respnse! Thanks!
And I will. xo ~r
It matters not what the topic is....we are typically all at one end of the possible spectrum or the other. The Bush / Gore presential election was an iconic example of a people divided. The latest Libya speech by President Obama had few pundits in the middle saying it was an ok speech...many many more saying either brilliance or utter stupidity.
My question back to you and your readers: "Is it possible that the better informed and connected a people are, the more polarized they become?"
"Is polarization of a people the natural outcome of all this information and connectivity between each other?"
Hey...you got me thinking!!!
1. By and large, people don't know who they are, or what they believe. We are bombarded with so much information every moment of the day, which wouldn't be a problem in and of itself if we adhered to any absolutes. But, we don't. We pride ourselves on pushing the envelope, nothing is ever enough, nothing is ever too much. Consequently, we don't self-govern. Anything goes. Tell me what to believe and the loudest voice gets my voice. Until the next noisy opinion comes along.
2. The deterioration of civility. Certainly, the dissemination of information has its effect on what people believe and why they believe it, but the greater cause seems to be that people have stopped self-censoring. Shock-value appears to be a blue-ribbon prize. In general, we feel little or no responsibility for the things we say or do and our society encourages that. Our leaders don't model restraint for us, our role models are anything but examples of civility... I could go on, but you get my drift, I'm sure.
These are but two of the reasons, there are many more, too many to list. You've raised a great topic for discussion within a discussion, JD. :)
Think of it as a "spinoff." LOL
(Sorry, I don't know how to do links in comments...)
S - I'm linking your post in the body of mine. I will link any others I come across, so if anyone else answers the OC, let me know and I'll link your post.
Linnnn - would love to see your response. let me know if you do one. I'll link to it.
R
Who am I? I'd like to think I'm that guy on the beach throwing back a few starfish. I'm not saving the world, but I think I am making a big difference in a few lives. I'm not going to give up just because I can't get to most of the starfish. People may say I am making no difference. Millions of starfish will die. But to the starfish I pick up, I am making a world of difference.
Uncle Edgar - such a beautiful sentiment in your comment. As a people, I think we long ago lost sight of the fact that if we make a positive impact on even one person's life, we have truly made a difference in the world. It's the old "pay it forward" principle. People who have been affected in a positive way by someone have a tendency to pass that on. Call it whatever you'd like - the Golden Rule, Pay it Forward, Love your neighbor... it's a sure-fire recipe for making the world a better place and it's a basic tenet we've all but forgotten. And one we need desperately to revive. Thanks for reading and for your great comment.