Verbal Remedy AKA Denise

Verbal Remedy AKA Denise
Location
Del Mar, California, The One That's In A State Of Steep Decline
Birthday
January 18
Title
Columnist, http://www.doesthismakesense.com
Company
Much preferred to the alternative.
Bio
Born. Grew up. Kept growing up. Started growing older. Still at both the growing up and growing older. Stay tuned.

MY RECENT POSTS

Verbal Remedy AKA Denise's Links

Just For Fun(ny)
Opinionated Much?
Personal/Memoir
Food Posts
Entertainment
Archive of OS Games/Memes
Editor’s Pick
JUNE 9, 2010 9:02PM

Yeah, It’s Got Vampires In It. You Got A Problem With That?

Rate: 38 Flag

  vampire-fangs

 

Attention, All Ye Great And Mighty NovelSnobs:

 

Let me begin with praise.

 

  • I admire the fact that you made it all the way through Infinite Jest, including all 100+ pages of endnotes.
  • I am humbled that you’ve read every last word of Ulysses. (I think I made it to maybe page 8 on one Bloomsday a decade-and-a-half ago)
  • If reading were an Olympic sport, I would give you a medal for finishing Faulkner’s entire body of work. (By about the fifth “Caddy smelled like trees,” I was totally outta there.)
  • I am in awe that you have read not only Gaddis but Pynchon and Vonnegut and Auster, and that in the near future, you intend to put an entire Garcia Marquez through a shredder, reassemble it with scotch tape, and devour it cover-to-cover in a masterful display of The Reader Authoring the Author.
  • The fact that you can (and do) pepper conversations about what you’re reading with references to Lyotard and Derrida and Baudrillard? Totally hot. Especially to grad students. Who can occasionally be totally hot, too. So that probably works out for you.

 


But me? Li’l ol’ me? With a pale and faded little certificate showing that I completed a Master’s in English program sitting there in my bedroom, gathering dust on a bookshelf next to a bunch of Martin Amis novels (I know, I know…he’s so middlebrow…and that thing he did when he fixed his teeth? Who could take him seriously as a novelist after that?)?

 

I know I have a problem.

 

I know I’m just not on your level, up there reading in the Big Leagues with you.

 

I know you find the mere existence of books that I enjoy…an insult to your intelligence.

 

Oh, yes. You do. I’ve seen what you’ve got to say about the kinds of books I choose to read. I’ve seen it at Amazon, at Barnes & Noble, in the Comments section of Big Salon. Most recently about the first selection of the Open Salon Book Club, which I am in the process of devouring. (Slurp. Yummy.)

 

You drip contempt all over my literary taste the way Pollock dripped paint on canvas.

 

Or maybe the way one of the “sticks” in the novel I’m reading right now sloshes a human’s blood and viscera all over…well, everything.

 

You think I’m a moron.

 

And that what I’m reading right now is a travesty of "literature."

 

That’s nice.

 

I’m OK with that.

 

 


 

So I’m joining in the fun and reading The Passage, the inaugural selection of the Salon Book Club. When I sent an email to Kerry saying, “Sure, send me a book, even though I have no idea what it’s going to be,” I figured what the hell. It couldn’t suck too badly.

 

Well. It doesn’t, but some of its characters sure do.

 

Yeah, it’s got vampires in it. But they’re not cool teenybopper vampires. They’re also not stiff, spooky Eastern European vampires. They’re definitely not the pristine, elegant, mannered vampires of Anne Rice. (Although, yeah, I’ll cop to enjoying the first few Rice novels, too. Right up until Queen of the Damned. I hoped against hope the old Anne might return, but no. By the time of The Vampire Armand, I figure the editing house had had just about had enough of Anne too, because they apparently couldn’t even be bothered to hire her a copyeditor competent enough to change the word for the yellow part of an egg from “yoke” to “yolk” throughout the whole manuscript. Or a proofreader capable of flagging such a blatant error in bluelines. Yikes.)

 

Where was I?

 

Ah, yes. Vampires.

 

These vampires are scary. But not for the reasons you're probably thinking, as you sit there with your nose and lip curled in a disgusted sneer.

 

As any lover of overly simplified black-and-white dichotomies will tell you, there are two kinds of readers: Those who will sully their fingers touching the pages of a book with vampires, and those who will not. (There are also two other kinds of readers: those who call books “novels” and those who do not. In addition, there are those who will at consider a light, fun, fast read, and those who believe that reading a “novel” should require the intellectual equivalent of an IronMan event.)

 

I am, in short, a reader who is (despite the saint-patient attempts by professors to change me) inclined to enjoy light, fast, and fun over weighty and slogging and brain-melting. Inclined to read books, not novels. more than willing to dive right into a book with vampires.

 

I am also a reader who loves sci-fi, speculative fiction, apocalyptic visions, and an overall “humanity is so fucked” theme.

 

So for me, at least, at at 200 pages in, The Passage is turning out to a joy to read. It’s putting me in mind of a few of my favorite reads of all time, in fact, which is not easy to do.

 

One of those is The Stand, which I've noticed is popping up in reviews and blogs about The Passage enough that I don't need to mention it. Even though I just did. (Although I'm hoping it's mostly like the first half of The Stand, which was all death-and-disease-and-despair, and less like the second half, which was all good-and-evil-and-God-and-stuff.)


  wardaynaturesend

 

Allow me a moment to backtrack.

 

When I was in High School—way back in the multicolored, leg-warmer-rich days when a raven-haired Ronald Reagan was enthusiastically saber-rattling in the direction of the Soviet Union—I picked up a novel book in the library called Warday by Whitley Strieber and his real-life boyhood buddy, James Kunetka.

 

Strieber (for the benefit of those who only read foreign novels in their original language and are unfamiliar with American genre authors) was at the time a successful horror novelist who’d already churned out The Wolfen and The Howling, both of which Hollywood eventually took a liking to.

 

He’s also the writer who a few years later would pen Communion, a remarkably convincing book about his personal abduction by rectum-probing aliens. Now, I’m not suggesting that he went all James Frey with that series; I’m just saying that he and Kunetka thoroughly convinced me in Warday, for a few hundred pages, at least, that a world existed in which limited nuclear war had created an America that was a bifurcated dystopia, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the same writer were capable of thoroughly convincing me that he’d been subjected to Close Colonoscopies of the Third Kind. He's so convincing, in fact, that I suspect he's absolutely convinced himself.

 

Anyway. I loved Warday.

 

Its use of a dual-voiced first-person narrative, coupled with an overflow of chillingly realized fictional government memos and documents, seared images and ideas into my impressionable little 16-year-old brain that still erupt from time to time. (Generally in dreams. But sometimes when I’m observing foreign policy. “Bring ‘em On” flashed me into Warday’s reality for a moment, for example.) An America bifurcated by thirty minutes of incredibly bad judgment, saddled with piles of useless remnants of electronics and machines that were permanently killed by EMP, populated with desperate citizens whose healthcare is rationed according to their radiation lifedoses.

 

Back then, we all thought it could happen. (It still could.)

 

The book haunted me.

 

A couple of years later, the same team co-authored Nature’s End, and this time the apocalypse was brought to you by environmental meltdown. The style was the same; the meltdown of human civilization was still the topic. But its visions of unchecked corporate power/corruption, charismatically evil demagogues, amd the natural havoc that these two writers created 25 years ago doesn’t seem so farfetched to me anymore anymore. In 2003 and again in 2007, as I stood under skies raining down ash with orange wildfires glowing on the mountains East of where I live, I couldn’t help flash back to terrifying scenes in Nature’s End that “recount” a devastating, Santa-Ana fueled inferno that destroys vast swathes of L.A and kills tens of thousands.

 

I love novels books that create new worlds in my brain that I can revisit from time to time.

 

So far, The Passage is building a world I’ll probably revisit on the inevitable day when a weaponized biological agent somehow escapes from its double-plus-escape-proof containment area and kicks off something unimaginably awful.


 

 

No, it’s not Great Literature. It will not be joining the Western Canon.

 

500 years from now, if there are human students, and if they’re still reading (rather than, say, receiving information uploads via info-neural ports or some other mechanism that doesn’t require teaching young humans a skill that takes roughly 12 years to perform adequately, and another lifetime to perfect), they will not be reading The Passage.

 

Guess what.

 

They won’t be reading Infinite Jest, either.

Or Pynchon.

Or Derrida, for that matter.

 

Tell ya what, Ye Great And Mighty NovelSnobs.

 

You read what you like.

 

I’ll read what I like.

 

We’ll get along just fine.

 

Please check your smug literary superiority complex at the door.

 

I'll get the wine.

 

We're going to need it when the vampires get here.


Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
"Please check your smug literary superiority complex at the door."

Amen

Biting piece, Denise.
Denise, I read People Magazine and the Eclipse books and love them all. Who cares what "they" think.

Anyhoo, I bought the book. Thanks for the review.

I can't get over that you correspond to Kerry. Impressive!

Denese
Good for you, standing up to the book mafia.

The never ending random detail of boring and alien lives never appealed to me, but I am back into Sherlock Holmes right now. Real beach reading for a low life like me....
Warday


I think I want to read that now...
:) it sounds good, I'm kinda sorry I didn't put my name in the hat for this one. The Sleeping Beauty Series were always my favorite Anne Rice books.
Hey, Bram Stoker was onto something. I think Vampires are hotter now than ever ...

Is that sacrificial wine ? -- (i.e. Blood?)
Cheers
I completely agree with you about the Anne Rice novels, and Christopher Moore does some pretty terrific vampire stuff, too. I have never read those snooty books that you mention at the top and never will. I like a balance of fluff and substance in my reading.

Excellent post. Amanda took the best line. :)
This was funny, Denise, even though I'm not big on vampire anything. FYI, Anne Rice doesn't permit her work to be copy edited, at least not since she got so successful. My feeling is that her publishers are getting a kick out of her looking bad even if her fans don't care.
I think my days of reading 500+ page literary tomes are over. Awhile back I read "Ender's Game." It has in spades all I'm looking for these days in a book -- a good story, well told.
When I was a young whipper snapper I didn't mind "heavy" books (those that weigh in over half a pound) - I read my first "thick" novel The Godfather when I was 16 or so, and I loved it. As I've gotten older I find my tastes have moved more to succinct, though I did get through several Dan Brown novels a few years ago.

I liked the old Eastern European vampires - but I'm a glutton for all things Easter European.

Great post. I especially liked two lines - the one that Amanda viciously, selfishly hogged at the top of the comments, and this one: "I love novels books that create new worlds in my brain that I can revisit from time to time." kp
Well, I'm reading the book, too -- just finished part one, about where you were in the story when you wrote your essay. I have to be careful about this but I think I disagree with a least some of what you said. I acknowledge your allergy to the classics, but Cronin has done in his time in the world of literature and the Western Canon, and suffered through his share of Iowa workshop grillings, and I think the fact that he is in fact a peer of your much-hated DF Wallace resonates on every page of his new 'potboiler', making it a new and different kind of literature, which uses the tools of pulp and horror, fortified with the fineness of detail and sensitivity to the nuances of human feeling, to make something even Derrida could love (if you could persuade him to open it up in the first place).
I guess I'm saying you have nothing to be ashamed of in this book, at least so far -- nothing you need to defend to the snobs. The writing is beautiful and specific, grounded in the people so that we actually care what happens to them, much more intensely than we ever could in a standard end-of-the-world thriller ... and I include Warday in that category ... I read it years ago and found it haunting, as well ... though not for it's insights or characters. Perhaps Cronin's book will degenerate into sleazy trash now that all hell has broken loose. We'll see. For the moment, I'm just glad it's raining outside and I can take the day off to read.
"I love books that create new worlds in my brain that I can revisit from time to time."

Hmm, very well stated...

Rated.
YES thank you. I yelled a version of this rant just last night while waving my The Passage-loaded Kindle like a preacher waves a Bible. Life IS too short to slog through IJ, and another Bloomsday passes as I haven't yet read Ulysses. And now I'm going to go hole up and do some more slurping.

Post rated, for being totally exactly right.
You and me....yeah...we have something in common...

(The Stand is an all time favorite, and I am off to get your Vamp book now!)
Good post, Denise, and I concur with it's general theme, but I was surprised by the defensive tone. As I think Cindy asked, who are these elitists? Moreover, who cares? What makes good literature; who decides? Frankly, if it is entertaining, in my mind it is good.

In my early adulthood, I read Steinbeck and Jack Douglass (Never Trust a Naked Bus Driver) with equal enjoyment. I loved Kerouac. John Gresham is unlikely to win a Pulitzer, but he is a great story teller, and entertains a ton of folks who never heard of Derrida. But they're reading. Isn't that what it's all about? You betcha! {{{R}}}
I can't say I love vampires because they scare me so much. I loved bram stoker and I even enjoyed ann rice - not entirely as she does go way over the top but she has a flair, I'll give her that. love the stand. it is the quintessential escape read. and now this...I missed an opportunity to get a free copy of The Passage and I am kicking myself in the ass because it will be a while before it's available at the library.

bummer
Mornin' all!

As to the defensive tone...let's just say I spent plenty of time defending my taste (or lack thereof) in grad school and there are plenty of specific faces--student and professor alike--in the "audience" to whom I addressed this. (One of them is the person who dismissed Amis as middlebrow.) I'm of the Rod Emmons school myself--if people are reading something and enjoying it, it's good. Doesn't fly so much with the literary crowd.

Not that they'd bother reading a blog.

They're up to their elbows in literary journals.

:-)

The real motivation behind this was comments I've seen online from people who (like you, Token) won't crack the book open before they decide it's crap, and it's got to be crap, has definitely got to be crap, because bloodsuckers are part of the mix. Axelrod, you've got it right...this is not a piece of lightweight escapism.
When I was taking a creative writing course as an undergrad (at Johns Hopkins, in John Barth's department) I once confessed to my grad student TA that I didn't feel as if I fit in very well--my reading tastes ran to John Irving, for example, rather than the metafiction and postmodern work we'd been studying (Don Barthelme gave a talk in one of our classes, which was kind of cool). The TA reassured me that what I liked was literature, too.
Amen Denise! Brain fluff reading has an important role in the quality of my life, as do heavier tomes. I'm so twisted that I reread The Stand as a backdrop to the evening news when H1N1 broke out! :-)
I guess I like to revisit those worlds as well.
I don't do "name dropping" - including for literary stuff. This is admittedly, in part, because I don't do names well. It's also because my brain is apparently not wired for details like year of publication and name of author and title . . . so I'm never going to be considered an intellectual heavyweight. Once I realized that, my life got better.

Books, for me, are like wine. I like it or I don't. Others may like what I don't like and vice versa. Therefore, I would give this book a shot on the merits you cite.

Incidentally, have you ever read The Fifth Sacred Thing? That's one of my go-to books for sheer apocalyptic hopefulness.
Every man and woman is unique ,so test of everyone unique.Some body like James Joyce,another like Hemingway.I appreciate your choice.but you must also appreciate others choice.
i'll check it out. i've avoided all vampire stuff on the general premise that i might like it and have yet another thing on my list that i can't get enough of. like i've got time for *more*??

i love good writing and books/stories/articles that hold my attention. sometimes i get both, and then i'm really happy. reading your blog, whether i agree with what you're saying or not, qualifies. ::: big smile :::
You should try J.R.Ward. She writes modern day, vampires-as-the -good guys, urban fiction. It has romance, and realistic,steamy sex scenes, but I don't think of the series as "romance novel". And I agree with you about the snobs. As long as you are reading, its all good. Gotta wait till payday(tommorrow) to get the book, but your review makes me think I will devour it this weekend.
Enjoyed your post. I don't think I'm a total snob, and I am plugging away at The Passage, being lucky enough to get one of the OS free copies, but not enjoying it as much as I would like to. Not sure why. He's certainly a decent writer with an interesting premise, characters are alive, but, well, I'll let you know how it works out for me. I loved the Strand, actually, first half much better than second, agreed. I recently re-read the Steven Bachman books, which I found mesmerizing again, particularly The Long Walk. I like dark.

Meanwhile, still stuck at page 461 of Infinite Jest. Love it, but just can't finish the damn thing. Sadly, I know how it turns out, he makes me cry ...
Er, that would be The Stand, not the Strand. Hmmm wonder where that came from?
I'd read and comment, but I'm way too busy reading this page turner called The Passage. It's got vampires!
Ha! I've been out of grad school for so long, I just assumed that canon-bashing had prevailed and pop fiction could be considered "literature" now . Oops. (Guess that explains why my review of the new Twilight novella went largely unnoticed! )

Great review. I wasn't planning to read this book, but now I'm intrigued...
For me, it's the old issue of vampires and nightmares-- while inside my fearful eyes begin darting into dark closets, while outside my imagination sees blood-sucking fangs while the bats above are only looking for blood-sucking mosquitoes, when my husband zooms in for a nice neck kiss, my mind goes on alert instead of relaxing into those luscious lips and somewhat sexy fangy teeth....
I'm checking my not-so-smug literary creepiness complex at the door and looking forward to the next book choice.
Great review; scathing commentary.

I've got The Passage right here, next to me. I intend to open it this weekend.

[I remember after 9/11, living in NY, some local writer or radio person, I don't remember who, prognosticated that we'd be seeing a dramatic uptick in horror, doomsday, sci-fi -- writing, 'tooning, movies, t.v. It seems to be coming to pass. For better and worse.]
oh, uh, and I'm a dolt... I didn't know I Could get a free copy....

{like tink, wanders off...}
Throughout my 20s and 30s I read exclusively horror books. My favorites were the vampires ones. I loved Dracula and They Thirst (Robert McCammon) ; almost loved Salem's Lot. Anne Rice I eventually got annoyed with, because she gussied those suckers up and moved them uptown, where they remain, as far as I know, in the Twilight series (heard a lot about it but haven't bothered to check it out. )
Vampires are supposed to terrify, not be all cute and sexy, well, maybe a little sexy.
A previous commenter mentioned Jack Reacher. If you're talking about turning the pages, Lee Child is the hottest writer alive. (John Sanford and old Steve King ain't bad, either.)
I so rarely get to write "ROFLMAO," but I kind of am. I confess that only two days ago my visiting mother-in-law called me in to watch Justin Cronin on GMA because she knows I'm a reader, and I could barely control my rolling eyes as I watched him with his great father-daughter story and his perfect, white teeth. I was thinking of Faulkner....

Seriously, I read all the "Twilight" books, and Streiber, back in the day, as well as all the English major stuff, and "The Passage" intrigues me. As soon as I finish the next two Stieg Larsson books I may just buy myself a copy of "The Passage" to read in the original English.
I always think it's funny when snobs eviscerate Jodi Piccoult, who with her Ph. D. in English and on-and-off professorship at the post-secondary level has managed to write books that people actually read. Which is to say, just because they are not literary masterpieces does not mean that she can't write literary masterpieces. It just means that she's smart enough to have figured out how to make money at her craft, something most of her critics simply cannot do.

All that having been said, I must confess surprise and ignorance at your distinction between "novel" and "book." I had no idea whatsoever that "novel" suggests something high-brow. Really, I just think of it as a word that means "fiction" as opposed to "nonfiction."

I'll also add that I have never read a vampire novel. I mean book. But it's not because I'm a literary snob, it's because I am indifferent to vampires. They don't float my boat. Or suck my blood or whatever.
I wasn't smart enough, or fast enough, to get a free copy of "The Passage," but I intend to buy a copy. It will be the first vampire book I have ever owned, other than "Dracula," which I haven't read. I've been feeling left out, but this seems like a good way to get my feet wet in a genre that I don't care about being lowbrow or not.
I cannot not read past a chapter of an Anne Rice novel...but I do adore John Fowles, particularly, The Magus. xox
cannot read past a chapter of Anne Rice....duh! xox
And I am rather fond of Charles Dickens and Thomas Hardy...xox
Yes! Thank you! Why is that intelligent, thoughful people have to read boooooring classic novels? Yawn! I love scifi-- the kind with aliens and robots and creeping Balrog that consumes your body and yet leaves you alive. The Stand is probably the greatest modern epic ever written.
And can we extend this line of thought to art house films? Can we? Because I cannot sit through one without fidgeting, wanting snacks and ultimately turning it off for some meaty reality TV.
There is no shame in escapest literature; if there was, they wouldn't teach you about it Eng 1B.
What turned me off, completely off, when I was doing my Master's was essentially that holier than thou attitude, not from professors mind you, but from fellow students who made me feel like I didn't "get" literature because I didn't read what they read. Or even liked what they liked.

Like ladyslipper I missed out on getting a copy and I'm buying one as soon as I can. But, it won't be the first vampire book in my library.
I love vampires. Love, love, love a well-written vampire story.

(And for all those vampire-putter-downers and stuffy English lit majors a wake up call, read Wuthering Heights carefully, very carefully, and you'll find a vampire after all.)

Loved this post.
In my youth, I felt obliged to work my way through the classics, because they were on the list of important books. I don't think I was trying to impress anybody - it was my intellectual version of going to the gym and getting in shape. I didn't think I would be a well rounded person unless I read them, whether they gave me pleasure or not.

I'm not sorry to have read a lot of the classics, but now in middle age I have lost the need to see myself as well educated. I have realized that the time remaining to me to read is limited, and I have decided that I will not longer squander it on reading anything that is dull to me. I am sure Faulkner and Joyce are enduring, important writers, but I'll be damned if I'll waste another minute of my life trying to plow through their books.
I love this! If I told you I read the whole Twilight series and loved them, could I be in your club? I also read The Road, and No Country for Old Men and enjoyed every page. I'm with you, bring on the wine and wait for B ella and Edward. Great Post!
I devoured every word you wrote...and if you heard chants of your name in the distance - it was me! I enjoy, almost too much, listing a Jackie Collins title in a discussion forum that asks "What are you reading?" The truth is, I haven't read Jackie Collins in eons, but I just like the comments I get...they're priceless.

Literary Pomposity doesn't irk me...it gets my juices flowing. And those types are soooo easy to lead into conversation and don't even see the virtual slaps coming! Heehee...
Hahaha, I love it! One of my favorite authors is one that no one else seems to have heard of, but I love the writing he's done. A sci-fi/fantasy writer with a penchant for dogs and Dos Equis, his name is Dean Koontz, and if you have the time, I would give the book Odd Thomas a try. Sounds like you've got a full plate though ;)
I just loved this post. You put it so well. This is so relatable: "I know I have a problem.

I know I’m just not on your level, up there reading in the Big Leagues with you.

I know you find the mere existence of books that I enjoy…an insult to your intelligence"

Now I am off to finish my Janet Evanovich detective novel so that I can get started on the new Jonathan Kellerman before it has to go back to the library in seven days. I'm trying to track down the Passage without having to fork over $20 for it....
I try not to be a literary snob. When you make the effort to read the challenging books others shy away from, you earn the stripes. However, purists can be boring as well.
You took the blood right out of my neck!
R
If "The Passage" is half as good as this post, it's worth reading. You're super-funny -- and stylistically impeccable. (But don't tell my friends I said that. It's just between us, 'k?)
I'm late to the party (what's new?) but loved this post. I am disturbed, however, by the yellowed choppers of the vampire in the photo, as well as the fact that he seems to have a piece of vein or artery or something caught between his two front teeth. I like a whiter-than-white smile on my fanged friends. Also, they should floss.

Rated.
you don't scare me sister I would like to take you in my arms and suck your neck. and when I got through I would lick and suck all overtill orgasum your beatif ul I can't stand it can you
I think war day is gonna become reality so you have to get what you can some people have arsonsonals bured also food non parashbules be carefull of the new world order.
Love the writing but Gary Brandner wrote The Howling, not Whitley Streiber