wild turtle crossing

slow: writer at play
Editor’s Pick
SEPTEMBER 11, 2011 11:41PM

Stolen Kisses

Rate: 28 Flag

 

 We were in Sarasota recently for a visit with family, when I mentioned to my brother-in-law, Rick, that I hustled my husband out of the hotel bright and early on Sunday morning to snap some photos of the sculpture in Island Park on the waterfront.

 

 

Oh, you mean the “Big Kiss,” Rick called it.

 

 

Yes. That’s it.  

 

 

At the front desk of the hotel where we stayed they called it the “Sailor and Nurse” statue.

 

“Oh yeah, you can’t miss it. Turn right, two blocks from the hotel…” (We had arrived the night before in the driving rain from the opposite direction, so in fact, we did miss it, but anyway.)

 

 

 

Unconditional Surrender.  That’s its given title.  It’s the work of Johnson & Johnson heir, J. Seward Johnson – part of a series with several versions begun in 2005. If you haven’t seen it in Sarasota, perhaps you’ve viewed it during its stint in Tuna Harbor Park in San Diego in 2007. Or in Hamilton, New Jersey on loan from Johnson’s Sculpture Foundation.

 

 

 

Supposedly, Johnson’s sculpture is based on a photograph in the public-domain Kissing the War Goodbye, taken by Navy photojournalist,  Victor Jorgensen.  

 

 

Jorgensen photo in the National Archives


 

Well, c’mon! Everyone knows the other photo, the iconic shot –  taken by Alfred Eisenstaedt for LIFE Magazine.  Acclaimed as the "father of modern photojournalism," Eisenstaedt chronicled the 20th Century with more published photos than any other photographer in history. (source:Michael Hoppen Gallery)

 

Eisenstaedt photo, forever in the public eye

 

As anyone can see – you can’t miss it - Johnson captured the spirit, the stance, the energy, even fashioned the skirt-pull of that exuberant full-bodied kiss, modeled from Eisenstaedt’s world famous  photo V-J Day in Times Square. The photo was taken on August 14, 1945 and published a week later in a 12-page section called Victory Celebrations.  Notably, (or not so notably) the plaque planted next to the sculpture erected in the Sarasota park makes no mention of either photo, but anyway…who’s reading? 

 

Snapping-happy, early that morning in the park, there we stood:  shooting pictures at the foot (and at the feet) of the statue on the morning of September 2, 2011 - coincidentally 66 years to the date of the formal signing of the surrender, marking the official U.S. celebration of “Victory Over Japan.”  But anyway, who’s counting all those years, the victories and losses, the casualties and  memories . . .  

 

 

The nurse, the sailor, the photographer, the sculptor, are now forever melded. One Big Longing Kiss.  Forever alive in a black & white still shot, in bronze, and in painted aluminum  – that sailor, that nurse, that time and place, and the millions of viewers forever after are locked in that one embrace, indelibly sealed in collective memory. 

  

But can art imitating art still be art?


 

 

Kissed off in Sarasota?

 

Those giant Navy uniform pant legs. The huge white shoes.  Is the kiss stolen or an attack on aesthetics?  Some call it kitsch.  A monumental mistake.  A giant smooch that smacks of plagiarism. A parody.  Fabricated in  aluminum to “withstand winds from a category 3 hurricane,” on the narrow strip of green between traffic on the street and public parking along the pier, Unconditional Surrender seems, well. . . fitting for Sarasota, Florida.  I don’t know why, but seeing that kissing couple in the park at the break of day feels uplifting to me . . . in a campy, Ringling Brothers circus, sunny Disney-world-weary sorta way.    

And if you call it kitsch, I guess I’m okay with that.   

 

 

Documenting life for LIFE magazine, Eisenstaedt shot nearly 100 covers and some 10,000 prints.  “You learn something from every picture you take,”  he observed.  Snapping up my own photos, stolen moments from life, I’m inclined to agree.   

 

 Well, what do you think?

 

Photos: VHenoch (or otherwise linked to original sources)

 with xoxoxo's and thanks for stopping by. 

 

 

 

PHOTOGRAPHER'S NOTES ON THE KISS

 

To capture what has become perhaps his most reproduced image, the kiss in Times Square on V-J Day, Eisenstaedt had been following the sailor who was "running along the street grabbing any and every girl in sight. Whether she was a grandmother, stout, thin, old, didn't make any difference. None of the pictures that were possible pleased me. Then, suddenly in a flash, I saw something white being grabbed. I turned around and clicked the moment the sailor kissed the nurse." In 1991 he told a New York Times reporter, "Although I am 92, my brain is 30 years old." To prove it he recalled that to shoot that victory kiss he used 1/125 second exposure, aperture between 5.6 and 8 on Kodak Super Double X film.

 

It's more important to click with people, than to click with the shutter." A. Eisenstaedt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
http://www.salisburycathedral.org.uk/news.inthenews.php?id=146
As usual, a gorgeous post. I'm glad for your eye. I get to see what you see close-up. Thank you!
Great photos in this post. I think it is a work of art inspired by another work of art. I live in San Diego where it is very controversial and will be moved soon. I will miss it and had the worst kiss and the best kiss under this piece. Art inspires and so your post qualifies too.
This was just wonderful--everything from your photos to the photographer's notes about it. I am evil and would have taken an upskirt.
Fabulous piece! It looks sort of cartoon-like.
I don't think it is kitsch, Vivian. More like a Norman Rockwell painting coming alive as a statue, maybe. . . A three dimensional version of what one of my favorite American artists captured about a period of life that no longer exists although we look back on those days with nostalgia. I loved your post and all the information you provided about the original photographer as well as the sculptor his shot inspired. Thank you.
♥R
Thank you for your comments, as always. I think the jury is still out on the sculpture. Standing 26 feet -- the piece does have a startling effect of looking like an illustration in the sky. I will add that through the magic - and deception ? - of Photoshop, I can share that impression with you, the viewer.

Public art tends to be controversial - illiciting strong opinions. One can argue that its function is just that - to provoke, intrude and make us "see" things in new lights - an argument in favor of the legitamacy of Unconditional Surrender. I will say that the piece moved me the first time, just passing it casually in traffic... compelled me to return to photograph it. So take away what you will.
great piece, vivian. i love the sculpture and wish i'd seen it when it was here in san diego, a place that has a history of displaying or considering commissioning some of the worst public art ever conceived. but johnson's statue, in my opinion, isn't on that list - it's terrific. that it didn't pass muster with the local rag's art critic wasn't a surprise, but he was in the minority, over there with the stuffed shirts.
I had no idea there was a sculpture. Yes it is still art. :0
Thanks for adding his other pictures too.r
I have a book called "Eisenstaedt's Celebrity Portraits" on my shelf. Thanks for reminding me. I will spend an hour browsing it this evening.
The sculpture I find too derivative, and a bit Disneyland in its execution.
Oh my me what comes around goes around. Thanks so much for this...I love the sculpture and boy those were the days...Your Great for sharing this... Cheers!
Love this photo essay - the photos (yours and Eisenstaedt's) and the essay. I didn't know about Jorgensen's almost identical shot. Amazing coincidence.
Can't beat the original photo. As a tribute and a way to brighten up a public space it's great, but when I first read it was done by a Johnson & Johnson heir I thought--an unoriginal rich kid with too much money and time on his hands.

r
Knowing well the demographic of Sarasota, I can see why this statue was a hit there. I like the Jorgenson shot better for pure truth.
Beautiful story and photos! Congrats on the EP!
Beautiful story and photos! Congrats on the EP!
Great post. I had no idea. Perhaps if it was not in 'color' it would have looked less kitsch.
This is terrific! Miguela had the same thought I did!
Great photos and backstory.
Plagiarism, imitation or tribute? I guess it depends on how you feel about the sculpture. It strikes me as interesting and catchy so I give it a pass. Thanks for the post.
As Matt, said, that is quite a coincidence regarding the two similar photographs. I never cared much for the Eisenstaedt b&w photo and I've never understood its crazy popularity. I always wondered if that nurse wanted to be kissed because she doesn't look too into it. It looks like he's trying to swallow her whole. If something like that happened today, the nurse would probably sue the sailor for sexual assault and end up on Dancing With the Stars. As for the statue though; I can't stand it. I mean, I really hate it and I'd never even heard of it until your post. (This is a tribute to your photographic skills.) I'd never want to see it in person. Whether it's parody or artistic plagiarism I can't say, but to me it's a banal, unoriginal way to commemorate V-J day and a waste of metal. So that's my opinion of the statue. But my opinion of your post is, superior and original! I loved it and also the other photos you included. I don't know what that last one is (the Life cover) but to me it's much more interesting than "The Kiss."
Like your pictures. Glad that you enjoy your time in San Diego. This park is only walking distance where I live in San Diego, and enjoy spending time at the park.This is a good memorial for our service men, returning home from service over sea. Thanks again for the pictures and the blog.
Absolutely wonderful, Vivian. Perfect really! love ah love
Love Eisie and I love this tribute. And the Seward Johnson sculptures are fun. It's ok for art to be fun, right? We were in Key West last summer and saw a few of the Johnson sculptures. There's a link somewhere on my page for it -
Great post and pics.. LOVE the new avatar..:)
HUGGGGGGGGGGGGG
Thanks for all your kind comments.

This post was illuminating for me as well -- flipping through the history of the shot and the controversy over the sculpture. I would weigh in -- in appreciation of all of it. Johnson has a similarly pop scupture of Marilyn Monroe with her skirt flip over the subway air vent (iconic pose from Seven Year Itch) -- also I'm reminded of the Wizard of Oz sculptures in Oz Park in Lincoln Park, Chicago. Love those. (More blog material... maybe in a few weeks.)

Oh, and Margaret - to answer your question -- the last image is actually a link to a video on YouTube. From a series -Masters in Photography.
These are great!!!! Thks.
Wonderful post and photos. i love the original picture.
I'm so glad to have found this post (congratulations on being on the cover). I lived in Sarasota from 1981 to 1999. When I returned for a visit a few years ago, I was driving down Rt 41 and looking forward to seeing the marina… oh how Palm Avenue, Main St., etc have changed in the last 12 years! Anyway, I just about crashed my car when I saw this statue. Hated it. Still hate it. And I LOVE public art and sculpture and memorials. But I really have an aversion to this. It dominates the scene, a beautiful Marina; is placed right on the edge of a very busy major intersection of multilane roads, which I feel is a dangerous distraction, and it doesn't look at all like art to me, and I love classical art, modern art, nonrepresentation art. But this looks like a big plastic figurine from the Dollar Store.

I'm not surprised though. When I lived in Sarasota there was controversy over the Statue of David (the city's mascot at the time) being on the side of police cars (just in silhouette).

But then again I am surprised because Sarasota is home to the Ringling Art Museum, Sarasota Opera, and so many beautiful galleries and buildings.

If they wanted to honor the original photograph, then a bronze statue (because the photo is not in garish color as the statue is) would have been best. One that blends in with the surroundings, enhancing but not dominating.

Well, just one person's opinion…thank you, Vivian, for the chance to express it!

R
I fully enjoyed this photo essay. I don't know how I would feel seeing the statue in person but in pictures there is something uplifting about it--it's romantic and fun. Of course, it can't compare to the original photo but I wonder how many people have learned of the photo because of the statue.
I see the appeal of the photos and the statue and the nostalgia aspect, but the woman's stiff left arm has always bothered me. Like Margaret, I think herbody language says she's not into it. Certainly her left arm isn't. To me the overall impression is passive compliance but a lack of responsiveness on her part. "Unresponsive" is the key word it suggests to me.
I am not knocking your post, Vivian. It is very informative and intersesting--and its always revealing to look at iconic images again after not having seen them for several years. We view them differently at different points in our lives.
Donegal,

Interesting observation. Turns out there's a lot of lore around this photo-- I believe the sailor and the nurse have reenacted that kiss for the fiftieth anniversary, or something like that. I don't recall exactly the article I read.
As for the hand dropped to her side... the appearance of an unconditional surrender -- as the story goes, the nurse's skirt had hiked up, and she was attempting to pull it back down. If you look at her hand closely, that appears to be what she's doing. :)
OH THAT KISS!!! I live near that statue during the winter months. Well up the road a piece. It is amazing. We were able to glimpse it from a boat and it gives another perspective. But OH THAT KISS.
I also adored Marilyn. Have and old calendar on our basement wall. It is always turned to November, by birth month. Thanks for a wonderful post.
Kitsch or not, it still looks like a good kiss to me. And a special thanks for those last seven Eisenstaedt photos - wonderful. I would so love to graduate from taking inanimate object photos to people photos - what a great leap that would be. . . to me, the biggest and best photo challenge.
A great post, Vivian, artful and informative. I didn't know there was a sculpture based upon the photograph. I really like the second picture because it seems to capture the essence of your piece, the preposterous scale, the artistry and the kitsch all together.
Thank you for this interesting post and giving the opportunity to respond.

To begin, I think there is great artistic and sentimental value in the photograph and the meaningful history behind it.

I live in the area and drive south on SR41 several times a week.
The statue is huge, bulky, unrefined, and looks like a rendering of a Macy's parade reject. With all the talented artists and artwork of all varieties in the area, it's inconceivable that this chunky lump should be placed in a high traffic area (left turns to downtown, merging traffic, the marina immediately to the right, a right-turn lane to the bridge to the island, a mirrored office building ahead) to distract drivers (lots of senior citizens with hearing/seeing problems plus tourists who aren't sure of where they are going).

I am a fan of street art, and this is not up my alley!
Joan,
So tell us what you really think. Your comment made me chuckle. Yeah, you're right... there's an aspect of the statue that's an accident waiting to happen. The only worse placement for it would be in the middle of the street.