That got me to thinking. Are Republican women really being moronic in their thinking? Are married Republican women so under the control of their husband that they cannot think on their own?
Do Republican women really want grey–haired, or balding, pot–bellied, older men, members of the U.S. Congress, making laws about what a woman can or cannot do with her body?
Has the women’s liberation movement rolled over and played dead? One must wonder why are there so many women showing up at Romney functions. Do all of them want to give up a very significant part of their rights as a woman? Apparently so.
Willard Romney is being disingenuous; if or when he says he supports women’s rights. By and large, I believe that is due to his religious upbringing and beliefs. By now, everyone knows that Willard M. Romney follows the Mormon philosophies – including the fact that Mormon women are subservient to men. Repeat – Mormon women are subservient to Mormon men. Some might refer to it as not a marriage partnership with equality, but blissful slavery. (BTW - There have been Mormons in my family since 1853.)
Willard reportedly said recently, “This is an election of consequences.”
Yeppp, that’s for sure. If Willard and Paul win, the consequences will be the deterioration of women’s rights, and in some ways, men’s rights too.
Barry Goldwater, “Mr. Conservative,” would not roll over in his coffin. Rather, he would sit up, change ends, and then roll over several times before coming to an upright position, resting on his right side, if he could realize that the conservative Christians have hijacked the Republican Party.
That’s why I will not vote for Willard. I do not want folks like the Westboro Baptist Church, or the Mormons, telling me how to live my life. By the way, I am a male and a moderate Republican.
When is the last time you heard of a U.S. presidential candidate who has off shore investments (with the specific purpose of avoiding paying U.S. income taxes); and, car elevators for his garage? Just curious.