William K. Wolfrum's Blog

Editor’s Pick
MARCH 3, 2010 10:31AM

I’m heterosexual – Wow, do I have a lot of rights

Rate: 54 Flag

My friends, I have long withheld this information, as I’ve long believed that my sexuality is no one’s business but my own. However, after seeing recent studies and news reports, I believe that now is the perfect time to come forward and admit what so many have long believed:

I am heterosexual. And let me tell you something, it’s freakin’ fantastic.

Now, I know all about Gay & Lesbian pride. The LGBT community is proud of who they are, and they at least have that right. But seriously, I’m not trying to gloat here, but being a heterosexual kicks ass. If there is a right available, I have it. I’m hetero, and like the Founding Fathers wanted, I win.

Before you get angry at me for bragging, let’s just go through some simple facts that prove being a heterosexual is like winning the lottery of rights, benefits and advantages:

  • I got to marry the person I love;
  • I can’t be fired from my job for being heterosexual;
  • I never was thrown out of school for being my heterosexual self;
  • If I was in the military, I could openly discuss my sexuality and not be fired;
  • Mormons will never rally together to deny me anything;
  • The Pope will never denounce me for being heterosexual;
  • I get every Social Security benefit available;
  • My marriage is accepted in all 50 states;
  • My heterosexuality would never get in the way of my ability to adopt;
  • No one will commit violence against me, or murder me for being heterosexual.
  • Entertainers don’t insult me or incite violence against me for being heterosexual;
  • Hell, there’s a lot more things my heterosexuality gets me. I didn’t even include the more than 1,000 rights and benefits bestowed upon me for being allowed to marry. Did you know that my Spouse’s flower sales count towards meeting the eligibility for Fresh Cut Flowers and Fresh Cut Greens Promotion and Information Act? Or that I have the Right to continue living on land purchased from my spouse by the National Park Service when easement is granted to my spouse? Neither did I, but I have those rights, as well.

    Oh yeah, and I’ll save roughly $400,000 by being heterosexual.

    Basically, being a heterosexual means I have so many more rights than gays & lesbians that there are a shitload of rights and benefits I have that I don’t even use or need. And I don’t have to march, protest or fight for any of them.

    So my friends, you better recognize. I have more rights, less expenses, less chance of being beaten, less chance of being disowned by family, and tons of other benefits, rights and advantages. Because I fell in love with, and desire a person of the opposite sex. For this, my life is clearly better than anyone who is gay or lesbian.

    The United States has made it clear – I am heterosexual and my life is better than the lives of gays and lesbians because of it. And, in the end, isn’t that what being American and living in the land of the free all about?

    –WKW

     

    Crossposted at William K. Wolfrum Chronicles

    Author tags:

    gay/lesbian, satire

    Your tags:

    TIP:

    Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
    Recipient's email address:
    Personal message (optional):

    Your email address:

    Comments

    Type your comment below:
    Straight-Privilege, like White Privelege is Terrif! except for gays and non-whites. :)
    Great explanation on how Equality is an important issue that we, as a country, must get behind. The LGTB community has long tolerated the injustice, with peace I might add, and the time is now to speak up to demand Equality in all corners of our country.
    Straight privilege, white privilege... and male privilege. Don't forget you get a lot of privileges just for being male too.
    Great post, William.
    You've taken Tim Wise's observations about White privilege and translated them into heterosexual privilege. Good idea. Well done.
    Thanks for the kind words, folks. And trust me, I'm well aware that as far as privilege goes, I hit the genetic grand slam, so to speak. For me, however, that means it's quite a bit easier to see those who get their rights trampled on.

    Bill
    Very well said. Rated.
    Why, you did hit the Grand Slam. This is good, thanks.
    This is fantastic! You're a keeper.
    I dunno Runaway Serfer. I'm male and I've never managed to cry my way out of a speeding ticket. Those females do have some perks.
    There are some things so smart I just wish I was the one who wrote them.

    This is one of them! You buried your point home. Great job.
    Awww, crap . . . you're right!

    Nicely done, sir . . . nicely done.
    This is a really clever way to approach the issue. I think it makes a lot more impact. Rated!
    Obviously you're not left handed.
    Being female isn't all it's cracked up to be, either. Gents don't get to feel it themselves, being the more privileged.
    I can't help feeling for the few who are, by birth and status, lesbian and, say, African American both. No stigma like the old guard's fav's, eh?
    Personally, there's another social stigma, that of being female and on your own. Add to that having been impaired, and you'll soon find you have no place in society--regardless of natural preference. Then add the additional ( and always insidious) stigma of being well over 35, and one gets to be on the low end of the totem pole for sure.
    Food for thought in our so-called era of enlightened choices.....
    America the free??? Guess we're still working toward that aim....
    wow. when you put it that way....
    A distrubing post in that by using cynical language and an irreverant slat you have brought to the surface and to the light the tragedy and insanity of what American has always been.
    Rated
    Great post. BTW, what the heck is "meeting the eligibility for Fresh Cut Flowers and Fresh Cut Greens Promotion and Information Act" ? (Wanders off to check the regs...) :)
    That NYT article about the costs of being a gay couple is fascinating. Thanks!
    Congrats on hitting the trifecta. ;)

    Well done! (r)
    well I have to agree with you, don't I?
    Um, Jinny, one of the tags on this post is "satire." The blogger is making a point (very effectively and humorously, in my view) about how many rights gay folks DON'T have in the U.S. by trumpeting the rights, big and small, heterosexuals DO have.

    I was amused, and impressed. This might just get through to a few folks who have tuned out the "gays going on about their rights" articles and soundbites in the news.

    (I realized I just used "folks" twice in two paragraphs, and I never do that. WFT?)
    bravo, sir..and thank you so much for saying this. it means a lot to me to read this right now. the injustice of it all has really come home to me in the last few months. i am legally bound to my partner here in France, and yes, it's better than what's available back on that side of the pond, but we still don't have all the rights that a straight couple has. we worry about the children we are planning and how we can protect them and ourselves.

    i find the basic lack of rights and protections infuriating at times, but for me the worst part has been being treated completely differently by family. it was a huge deal for me to wed my froggy wife, but our union has been completely ignored by my entire family (while at the same time i watch my heterosexual siblings, cousins and even my (twice-married)mother being showered with congratulations and encouragement) this has hurt me in a way that i didn't know possible. i don't give a shit about presents... a simple acknowledgement of this rite of passage, this finding of someone to share my life with... i suppose i was naive to expect it, but i did.

    sorry for the silly 3:45am personal rant. your piece set aspark a painful piece of tender in me. life is wonderful in general, but sometimes it really sucks to be gay...

    merci beaucoup... you rock, in my book!
    melx
    Yeah. You really hit the jackpot. I'm glad you appreciate it.
    And those are just the WRITTEN rules! You can be trusted in a room alone with small children, for example. Oh wait, that's not funny, is it?
    (Yes, I did enjoy this post very much.)
    Mr. Wolfrum certainly puts it where it should be--how silly it is to define yourself by sexual preference--oh no, that's wrong--inclination, no--orientation--that's no longer correct--membership in a community?
    Sex is a private matter, what you do in private when there is nothing good on TV. It is not the be-all or end-all of existence. It is something less than a preoccupation and more than an avocation. Most people in this country lead asexual lives. Let's leave it that way and shut up about it before we have to learn more new words.
    I'm white and heterosexual. In fact, I am a middle aged white lady and nobody ever suspects me of anything. I don't get profiled, except in a good way. 'Swonderful!
    And here I was, not knowing about all my straight rights. You did a service by pointing this out. I can now come out of the closet. Probably be in the Dog House, but at least theres some light!
    As a fellow (mostly) heterosexual white male, I can't help but agree that it is pretty awesome. I just wish we could get to a time where we are all finally treated equally regardless of gender, sexuality, race, or religion. No special privileges to anyone, no discrimination against anyone. We're all humans. Let's have some fundamental human rights. Rated.
    "I hit the genetic grand slam"

    Amazing!

    Very thought-provoking and eye-opening - I mean eye-opening in the sense that now straight people know that they have 400,000 dollars more than the Gay.
    Great post! Delicious sarcasm!!
    There is one point I do not agree with: When you write: "Mormons will never rally together to deny me anything" you are perpetuating a falsehood. In the words of the article you link to:

    "Frank Schubert and Jeff Flint of Schubert Flint Public Affairs wrote about how they got Proposition 8 passed in California. Their conclusion: Members of the Mormon faith played an important part of the Yes on 8 coalition, but were only a part of our winning coalition. We had the support of virtually the entire faith community in California. Prop 8 didn’t win because of the Mormons. It won because we created superior advertising that defined the issues on our terms; because we built a diverse coalition; and, most importantly, because we activated that coalition at the grassroots level in a way that had never before been done.” (Quoted from the Feb.2009 issue of Politics magazine)

    The facts as I understand them are:
    1. Mormons comprise barely 2% of the population in California.
    2. The bulk of the votes for prop. 8 came from the African American and Catholic communities.
    3. Yes, I am a member. That's why I've spent so much time researching and analyzing this issue and the publicity surrounding it.

    Also, I hold that the anti-Prop. 8 activists have incorrectly made the assertion that the complete re-definition of the word "Marriage" with respect to BOTH Church AND State is somehow an absolute necessity as touches the civil rights of gay and lesbian couples. I respectfully disagree.[in fact, you don't have to look long before you find those in the gay and lesbian community who also disagree]

    Should gay and lesbian couples have the same civil, legal and personal rights, status, and obligations as married heterosexual couples? Of course! Absolutely! These can easily be asserted, established, and enforced by the states WITHOUT changing the meaning of "Marriage". Equivalency does NOT require the
    redefinition of a word!

    The bottom line here is this: You can't have it BOTH ways. Either the doctrine of religious freedom established in the 1st amendment applies as so many have so loudly asserted for so long; Or, a new precedent must be set that would create more problems than it would solve.
    this lesbo loves you.