This Sporting Life
Wayne Norman
- Bio
- I teach in the Kenan Institute for Ethics and the Philosophy department at Duke University, and host the sport-and-philosophy blog, www.ThisSportingLife.net
MY RECENT POSTS
- "Why no gatherer-sports?"
September 04, 2010 11:43PM - Blemishes on the beautiful
game, Part 1
July 06, 2010 09:56AM - Root, root, root for...the
underdog
May 17, 2010 07:21AM - Root, root, root for...some
team or other
May 17, 2010 07:20AM - Why is hockey analysis always
so lame? Part 3
May 17, 2010 07:16AM
MY RECENT COMMENTS
- “Of course, sagemerlin,
it's often better to have
regulations
to restrict
various…”
February 02, 2010 04:33PM
Wayne Norman's Links
"Why no gatherer-sports?"
There's an old adage one hears in business schools to describe managers with a limited range of management skills (and presumably limited career prospects): if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.
And if the only two tools you have are a hammer
… Read full post »Blemishes on the beautiful game, Part 1
It's been a terrific World Cup so far. We all have to keep our fingers crossed for the semi-finals and the finals being as intriguing as the quarters, because our individual and collective memories of the overall quality of any given World Cup lean heavily on the quality of those
… Read full post »Root, root, root for...the underdog
In the previous post I began with the intention of quickly introducing a link my colleague David Wong sent me to a fun article in Slate called "The Underdog Effect: why do we love a loser?" But before I could think about why some of us cheer for underdogs, I couldn't help/
… Read full post »Root, root, root for...some team or other
An uncharitable, but not wholly inaccurate, line on This Sporting Life is that it's all about how to be a sports snob while still being a genuine sports fan. Of course, nobody wants to admit they're a snob. ("Connoisseur" is so much more urbane.) If you're into the themes of/
… Read full post »Why is hockey analysis always so lame? Part 3
I'm obviously making this up as I go along; but if you've read Why is hockey analysis (almost) always so lame? Part 1 and Part 2, thanks for bearing with me. So far I have talked mostly about the ways in which hockey analysis (on TV, in the daily press) is so frust/
… Read full post »Why is hockey analysis always so lame? Part 2
I don't remember a world without instant replay; although I was born into such a world. After clever but misbegotten attempts to use instant replay from the mid-1950s on, it is generally conceded that the first "modern" use -- and not yet slow-motion -- was in the broadcast of the
… Read full post »Why is hockey analysis always so lame? Part 1
My friend Andrew Potter (author of the sizzling new book The Authenticity Hoax) tweeted a link on Friday [when I began writing this post] to a compelling contrast between the two biggest stars in the world of ice hockey, the Russian Alexander Ovechkin and the Canadian Sydney/
… Read full post »Is March Madness the American Idol of Sports?
[Warning: What follows is an overly long post, even by the standards of this rambling blog. It is summarized over the last 3 paragraphs or so.]
At some point during the month-long March Madness gabfest on sports talk-radio Mike Greenberg (on ESPN’s “Mike and Mike in the Morning&rdqu
… Read full post »Why a true NFL fan would have watched the draft
3.7 million people watched live coverage of the NFL draft this past weekend. And that figure surely doesn't include my father, since he was watching in Mexico. My dad never really stops following the NFL during the calendar year. The official end of the season with the Super Bowl just
… Read full post »More on what makes golf great. And not so great.
In the last post I sketched out some of the reasons why Tiger fans (and some Tiger haters) like golf. And by "like" in sports I don't mean merely "enjoy" it or have a "revealed preference" for it. A true sports aficionado likes sports in the way an art-lover or
… Read full post »What can we learn from Tiger?
Tiger Woods could be the poster child for This Sporting Life. When I began this blog I identified four broad areas of interest for me at intersection of sports-philosophy-sociology. Thinking about sports can tell us a lot aboutpunditry, institutional design and ethics (or sportsm
… Read full post »The historic significance of Butler's victory over Duke
Move over Gonzaga, Villanova, George Mason, and the Western Texas Miners. There's a new Cinderella in town. Take that, Goliath: there's a new David. Butler's unlikely run all the way to the National Championship last night was like cotton-candy-for-breakfast in the sports media this morning.
Many in
… Read full post »Why the new NFL overtime rule is an improvement
Real NFL fans should like the new overtime rule -- especially once it gets applied to the regular season -- for the same reason that most of the real NFL coaches hate it. It holds out the promise of more high drama of the kind the NFL does best: where the
… Read full post »The old NFL overtime rule was not unfair
On Tuesday the owners of the NFL franchises agreed to change to the rules for how to deal with playoff games that end in a tie after "regulation" time. (On average, about one of the 11 games each post-season is tied after 60 minutes.)
The old rule was simple: a
… Read full post »Are women’s sports “separate but equal”?
We are rightly suspicious of arguments that justify institutional arrangements that promise to be “separate but equal.” These three conjoined words have had a unique ring in American culture ever since the landmark unanimous decision by the Supreme Court in the Brown v. Board of Educ… Read full post »
How do women’s sports measure up?
You’d hardly know it watching ESPN commentators these days, but there are actually two NCAA D1 college basketball championships going on now: one for men, and one for women. (To ESPN's credit, they do pay to broadcast the women's Tournament; even if they don't give over much of their/… Read full post »
Will the NCAA Tournament become the next asset bubble? The c
In the previous post I suggested that a 65-team tournament could be justified not because it was more likely than a more exclusive tournament to crown a worthy champion, but because it helped the NCAA meet a number of its reasonable objectives – which include providing a great experience f
… Read full post »Meta-bracketology, part 2: Madness by design
Meta-bracketology: is there method behind March Madness?
Bob Knight on How Good UConn Women’s Coach Gino Auriemma Is
Why Medal Counts Don’t Really Count
You have to wonder what the ancient Greeks talked about after their Olympic games finished. (I mean, we know what the modern Greeks talked about, or should have talked about, after their Olympics: how the hell are we ever going to pay for this?! Does anybody here have any connections at… Read full post »
Who Lost the Vancouver Olympics?
The Wall Street Journal may not have won any journalism medals for its failure to foretell which financial institutions on its eponymous street would crumble first. But they have spared us the leg work necessary to figure out which countries did the worst at the Olympics.
They have handed out lead,… Read full post »
Who Won the Vancouver Olympics?
I suppose the official answer to this question is, “The World,” which according to the IOC mission is supposed to be made “peaceful and better” by “educating youth through sport practised in accordance with Olympism and its values.”
But of course anybody who asks… Read full post »
Chess on Ice; Chess Board on Pants
There’s an irresistible cliché for broadcasters of many sports: the “chess match.” Often an announcer is simply pointing out that there’s a tight back-and-forth battle going on. But to make sense of the metaphor there has to be some strategic rationality, where player A tries… Read full post »
How Good is Women’s Hockey?
Pretty good, that’s how good. The gold-medal game, like all of the games I can remember between the only two consistently-elite women’s teams — Canada and the USA — was certainly a thrill from start to finish.
But when we ask, “how good is it?” we usually mean, … Read full post »
Salon.com