There's a lively little comment thread going over at Ed Gorman's blog reacting to his post about how many of the best selling books for the Kindle are free. Crime fiction writer Dave Zeltserman commented, “Didn't mean to delete my comment, which was about Matt's reasonable anger towards where the kindle will be taking us--death of bookstores, death of publishers, and eventually the death books, at least those written by professional authors (since there will be no way to make money with novels).”
I'm amazed at the apocalyptic alarmism about the imminent death of bookstores, publishing and professional writers caused by the introduction of the Kindle and other reading gadgets.
If the Kindle et al are selling as well as their proponents are claiming, it means that there are a surprisingly large number of people so enthusiastic about reading that they are willing to invest $200+ just to read books.
Where there are enthusiastic readers there is a robust market for books. Where there is a market for books, in any format, there are commercial opportunities to exploit textual content.
If walk-in bookstores are slowly supplanted by electronic only books, so what? Books will still be read, only in different ways.
Although Kindle owners might like all books to be free, it won't happen. Writing is a time intensive occupation that most people can't pursue if they aren't able to generate at least a subsistence income. There will always be a lot of cheap or even free ebooks from frustrated writers unable to interest reputable publishers in their books who utilized vanity presses and POD in the past. Most readers will ignore those books, as they do now.
With the flood of available content, there will remain a need for some system readers can rely upon to sift the dross from the gold. Right now, agents, publishers and the admittedly declining venues for reviews serve that function. The need for qualitative ratings will remain. Some system will arise to satisfy it.
I'm not scared about Amazon's prospects for world domination. It remains to be seen whether the Kindle, with its proprietary software, will conquer the ereader category. There are already alternatives to Amazon, like Sribd, where writers can make texts available in a variety of formats and set their own price. More such sites are likely to spring up. But, assuming that Amazon eventually becomes the sole publisher of books, they can only make a profit charging for them, and the talented writer will still have a publisher seeking to purchase their writing.
TIP:
Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Dan Schneider
Survivant
Jan Sand
Ted Frier
Thoth
Laura Bloom
Salon.com
Comments
As for concerns about authors being able to make a buck by writing…well, I am sure in a competitive age like the one in which we live, anyone who can wring a dime out of anything will manage to do so. I think one thing people who enjoy writing ought to consider, however, is that making a buck out of writing is very much like making a buck out of being a terrific baseball, football, or basketball player. It happens, but mostly it is going to be very small potatoes…and only the very best (and the luckiest) will ever do it for “a living.” Even people doing it for “a living” mention that it mostly is a very modest “living” at that.
I’ve only sold on piece in all the years I’ve been writing. NEWSWEEK pays a stipend of $1000 for a MY TURN…and I was lucky enough to land one once.
In any case, I agree with you that the sky is not falling here.
"Even people doing it for “a living” mention that it mostly is a very modest “living” at that."
You're certainly correct. Too many writers turn themselves inside out trying to get that one big score. You should write because you enjoy it, since that's usually your only reward.
If you own the rights to your Newsweek piece, you should publish it on OS.