Writing Raven

Writing Raven
Location
Anchorage, Alaska, USA
Birthday
March 15
Bio
I am a twenty-something Tlingit/Athabascan woman. I never plan on leaving Alaska. And - though I wouldn't have thought this was any kind of issue until recent inquiries - am straight, and always plan on being straight, as well. :) I am not married and have no children, so I frequently take children from my friends, spoil them ridiculously, and send them back. I've also begun to write my first book.

Writing Raven's Links

For my older posts, go to...
Editor’s Pick
JANUARY 13, 2009 4:27AM

This is why we won't miss Bush.

Rate: 9 Flag

Every once in a while I will come across someone, usually online, who thinks that the anger and disappointment - not to mention embarrassment - conjured by Bush is "Bush bashing." Unpatriotic, without merit, simply disagreeing to disagree.

I was looking at an opinion piece in Indian Country Today - a "how-to" deal with the Obama administration for tribes - when I noticed the other articles I was picking up on.

No, not exciting. Policy stuff. Tribal enrollment issues. Wasting money. But extremely important to groups of people right here in the U.S.

Uranium mining. Yes. URANIUM MINING. This is not the sort of mining that hurts the environment in the usual way. This is pretty scary, proven-unhealthy-big-scary-ways mining. So why not open up more land, and make this especially dangerous for tribes?
Bush's last minute mining decisions and how it affects tribes

To most in the U.S. "enrollment" doesn't mean much of anything. But tribal enrollment can mean everything. DISenrollment can be life-changing.

I visited the American Indian Museum just after it first opened in D.C., and thought one small exhibit very interesting. It was a letter from the Bureau of Indian Affairs to a Native man. It seemed that, after thought, the BIA had decided the man was not Native after all.

Can you imagine getting a letter telling you that you are not a Smith, or a Jones? That you are not white, or black, or Native? Now imagine needing membership to prove you are this group or another (Native people need many.) And imagine not being able to receive it.
Bush's "you're Indians, but not the right Indians" decisions for 2008

Good ol' Kempthorne. This guy Bush picked... what a winner.
Outgoing Sec. of Interior Dirk Kempthorne gives one last flush down the toilet for Native spending

My point here is simply that it is not bashing to disagree, it is not vicious to want big change, and now, and it is certainly not unpatriotic to be angry and embarrassed by a president who treats one large group of his own people this way. And that's just a few examples in the last few months. Eight years have gone by, and I know no Native person who is saying, "Boy, life is just a little bit better after all that." Or, for that matter, "Well, things are about the same." I know far, far too many that are looking for the silver lining in what was handed over, and instead hoping that their lives are not made more difficult by the next eight years, as they were the last.


And for the Native folk - a few suggestions on how to handle things this time around.
A "to-do" on handling the Obama administration and Native policy

UPDATE: I had to change my "plutonium mining" to "uranium" because, apparently I can't keep planets - or elements - correctly aligned in my head.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Slimy to the end. $350,000 on remodelling a bathroom while Indian kids go hungry? Sounds like the Bush legacy all right.
I wrote a blog on why I won't miss Bush. Then it turned into a short story. Then it turned into a Novella. Then I had it published in hard back. It's currently the largest book on my bookshelf right next to "War and Peace".

I suggest that rather than playing a piano recital for the Queen by our outgoing Secretary of State (Oh YES, she deserved it after the hard work she's done for our country!!!!) , we could have spent that tax money on Air Force One flying Mr. Bush to some of the Indian Reservations around our beautiful country.

rated
This is an interesting post. I am not familiar with the relationship between the Alaskan Native peoples and the federal government. Is it the same or similar to the relationship between the feds and the lower 48 so-called "Domestic Dependent Nations?" That relationship, coined in (I think) the early 1800s by Chief Justice Marshal (I think he was the guy. I need to brush up), effectively created a new class of slaves reporting directly to and under the control of the federal government instead of the states. The previously sovereign nations and all of their lands were subject to the whims of Congress, the Secretary of the Interior merely a protector of the interests of the mining and ranching interests. The States and special interests continue to feast on the resources in Indian Country.
The differences in the relationship between the Fed. gov't. and Alaska Native people is very different (from what I understand) than that of the Native people of the Lower 48. Although I only have the one perspective, please look up "Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act" and you'll see a major difference just in this. ANCSA, in its most basic form, settled land disputes (uh... well, as much as they could be settled) between state, Native people, etc. with a "buyout" of land. The money went to 13 (12 originally) newly formed Native corporations, and Alaska Native people born before Dec. 19, 1971, who were at least 1/4 Native, could enroll as a shareholder.
The implications of this are many, but I can give you one decent example of the difference. Although we certainly have our problems with the fed. gov't., health care is one area in which we have taken control. While so many areas must rely totally on Indian Health Services, Alaska Native people were the first to claim ownership, and in part due to Native corporations, in part to third party payers, we have a much, MUCH better health system. Now, whenever I say that, invariably somebody talks about a bad experience they've had, but I'm not claiming it can't be better, nor am I thinking it will ever be perfect (can you name a health system that is?)
Okay, I could go on and on, but there is a great difference. We don't have any reservations (save one community in Southeast Alaska) and we (for the most part) didn't get removed from our land -in fact, you will find many, many Alaska Native villages still on or near the original site.
Now, with THAT being said, we also hear a lot that we're "spoiled." I hope to remind people that this generally means we weren't treated quite as bad, or haven't been shafted as bad, so we should feel pretty lucky. My thoughts on THAT are a whole other post.
Hi, Raven, thanks for the info. Very interesting. I've heard of the Alaska Native claims act but never read it. I am not an American Indian, but I have an interest in Native people in American law and studied it a little bit. My interest came out of the Hawaiian sovereignty movement. I am not Hawaiian, either, but in another life, I taught classes on the Politics of Hawaii, of which the sovereignty movement is an integral part. Again, thanks. I'll follow your essays now that I've discovered them. Excellent stuff.
Thank you for this informative and forward looking post. May the days of treating anyone who lacks millions as less than human be well behind us.
Bush bashed himself ... and the party!
cyclopic (and anyone else interested in ANCSA) - As I was reading some stuff in the Anchorage Daily News, I came across this column by former ANCSA Corporations Chair Sheri Buretta, published yesterday. It is a little bit of ANCSA cheerleading, but certainly a valid perspective as Alaska celebrates its 50th year of statehood.

http://www.adn.com/opinion/compass/story/651696.html
Hi, Raven, thanks for the info and link. I'll check it out. cy