Written by an American

Written by an American
Birthday
October 31
Bio
Writer-professor-and-a-few-other-things. Former student, dockworker, bookseller, consultant, music store clerk, pizza deliverer, furniture mover, editor, and more I can't remember at the moment.

MY RECENT POSTS

Written by an American's Links

Salon.com
JANUARY 13, 2012 5:16AM

The Time has Come

Rate: 6 Flag

As the latest corporate-media-approved election spectacle draws near, I have a few thoughts, and a proposal.

As you contemplate the Obama-Romney contest, ask yourself: What do I believe?

If you believe, for example, that the United States was, in fact, founded on Christian principles; that the idea of “entitlements” for the poor and disadvantaged is fundamentally misguided; that gay marriage is an existential threat to the institution of marriage itself; that the military is the only federal program that deserves generous funding; that evolution is unproven; that deregulation and the free market are the answers to most of our economic, environmental and social ills…. then you have a clear choice in the Republican Party.

If, on the other hand, you believe in guaranteeing civil rights for gays, ethnic minorities unpopular religious groups; that some regulation is necessary to protect the environment and public safety; that science, not religion, should be taught in science classrooms…. then it’s only natural the vote Democratic.

If, however, in addition to any or all of the above opinions, you also think that the U.S. has no business engaging in unprovoked and immoral wars of choice; that torture is unequivocally unacceptable; that due process and rule of law should be applied equally to all; that economic justice trumps the demands of the free market; that high-quality, affordable higher education should be available to any qualified applicant; that decent health care is a basic right of all citizens; that swindlers, liars and murderers, regardless of position or affiliation, should be held accountable for their crimes….. If you believe all these things, then, I’m sorry to say, you have no party in America today.

It’s time for people who believe these things to say "no more" to the Democratic Party. They don’t represent us and they have no business expecting our votes. When Obama announces that his immediate agenda includes the end of “indefinite detention” and presidentially authorized assassination, the criminal prosecution of Wall Street malefactors, ending corporate control of Congress, the return of due process, seriously progressive taxation, universal health care, debt-free higher education, and the investigation of the Bush administration for war crimes… then I’ll consider giving him my vote.

Till that day comes, and pigs take wing, I have a proposal: the 99% Party. The time has come.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I can't help but wonder why you don't look at my Canada to see just how much having more Political Parties really does(n't) help? You folks ought to have figured out by now that political parties are NOT your friends. They are deeply embedded in the present process that is actively removing your rights. They are at the core of "the problem" and have nothing whatsoever to do with "the solution."

What makes you think that another of the same-old, same-old is going to make things any better? We, both our countries, need to face a few facts. One of those facts is that our present set-up doesn't work for 99% of the population. Is it so hard to believe that a different set-up is needed? Why continue to try to patch up something that doesn't work well even when it is working at its best; something it has no chance of ever doing again.

We're beating a dead horse right now and neither wishful thinking nor 'patches' will change that. We cannot 'wish' or 'repair' our way out of this situation. We simply MUST design and build a different economic system. One whose purpose is to serve ALL of us , not just a few. And we need a social system that removes the tyranny of a pyramidal power structure and replaces it with a horizontal, citizen involved, representative format.

Neither the social system nor the economic system that work well during the developmental years of a nation work effectively once that nation has become well developed. The rules for building a good car are very different from the rules for driving one. It's time to learn to drive.......
.
I honestly do not understand why “a third party” is ever touted as a solution to the problems we have with government. What would ever make anyone suppose that the third party would not immediately succumb to the corrupting power structure? In fact, how would the third party ever gain any traction, considering the situation in America, to seriously challenge either of the current parties WITHOUT SUCCUMBING to those corrupting influences? (Feel free to substitute “corrupting influences” with “money from various places.)

This is not the time for a third party...but it might be time for the 99% to start agitating for a change to a parliamentary form of government...which might open the door for viable other political parties.
skypixieo & frank-- Let me add this addendum, which I'll expand in a later post. A n99% party shouls be committed, bu its charter, to certain restrictions and principles that the other parties don't abide by. As was proven last fall, a movement with revolutionary tactics can gain notice without spoending hundreds of millions of dollars. Second, the formation of a party doesn't mean joining the same old game. This should be a revolutionary party dedicated to fundamental changes in the U.S. system of governance, as skypixieo suggests. Winning by becoming part of the system would be worse than losing.
I truly understand where you are coming from on this, Written By An American, and I may be a bit more jaded than you, but I just will not underestimate the power of money and the monied class to corrupt the process no matter what safeguards are put into place. The problem, as I see it is not the parties…and not even the money. It is that all the politicians are HUMANS…and humans tend to be easily corrupted. I simply do not seeing human frailty in this area being negated by a third party attempt.

Hope I am wrong; that you are closer to right; and that something of consequence happens, but I am not holding my breath. I think humans with money and status will ALWAYS corrupt leadership no matter what. And I honestly can think of no instance where that has not been the case so far.
I don't care whether you call it the 99% party or something else but we need major reform and it can't be carried out by the corrupt corporations. We need to start electing candidates that are truly independent of the corporations and that actually answer to the public.

This probably should include a major electoral reform process.
Sorry, but this is childish thinking, and it certainly doesn't honor the man you chose as your avatar, who was nothing if not a political realist. It is Sunshine Patriots who desert when things don't go exactly as they think they ought; real patriots stay and fight for what's right in the trenches, not in the Utopia of an imagined perfect world or perfect candidate.

Sorry to be harsh, but Utopia exists only in the minds of those who imagine they live somewhere other than the real world. In the real world, one of the two major parties wins EVERY time. You may see it as a vote for the lesser of two evils, fair enough, but a vote for the lesser of two evils is still far better than not voting or throwing away your vote on some third-party candidate with zero chance of being anything more than a historical footnote.

Do you really think this country would be the same shape today if millions of blue-collar voters hadn't abandoned the Democratic Party for the American Independent Party and George Wallace in 1968? The result of that third-party voting was a criminal Richard Nixon got elected instead of Hubert Humphrey, who very likely would have ended the Vietnam War much sooner.

And what about 2000 and third-party votes that went to Ralph Nader rather than Al Gore? Do you really think we'd have gone to war with Iraq under President Gore? Do you really think Gore would have appointed the equivalent of John Roberts and Sam Alito to the Supreme Court, cursing us with the Citizens United decision?

In short, where I come from such foolishness is called what is: Cutting off your nose to spite your face.