Xylocopa

Tales of a migrant worker in the global economy

Patrick D Hahn

Patrick D Hahn
Location
Cape Coast, Ghana
Birthday
June 07
Bio
All photos by the author are copyright of Patrick D Hahn. All rights reserved. To the best of my knowledge, all other photos and illustrations used here are in the public domain or are used with the permission of the copyright owner. If you believe a photo of yours has been used here without your permission, please email the author of this blog.

MY RECENT POSTS

Patrick D Hahn's Links

The Psychopharmaceutical-Industrial Complex
The astonishing rise of mental illness in America
Big fat lies
Is screening for cancer a giant con job?
The Gold Coast
The Holy Ark of the Covenant in Ethiopia
The Cradle of Humanity
The Medical-Industrial Complex
The War On Drugs
The Nutritional-Industrial Complex
Personal reminiscences
Personal essays
Books of interest
SEPTEMBER 13, 2011 9:08AM

A manufactured epidemic

Rate: 6 Flag

ritalin 

 

Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs, and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America by Robert Whitaker

 

An epidemic is raging in the United States of America, an epidemic of crippling and sometimes deadly disease. The disease is bipolar disorder, and the chief cause is the pharmaceutical industry.

 

That’s an astonishing charge, but author Robert Whitaker drives the point home with a vengeance. After reading this book, you will never look at our Medical-Industrial Complex the same way again.

 

The phrase “bipolar disorder” was invented only recently, but episodes of mania alternating with depression have been described as far back as Hippocrates. But the condition has morphed into a new and much more pernicious form. Since the introduction of psychotropic medications, the number of patients disabled by this condition has soared.

 

The year 1955 saw the introduction of Thorazine, the first drug touted specifically as a treatment for mental illness. That year, only about 50,000 individuals were confined to state and county hospitals for affective disorders – major depression and bipolar disorder, or “Manic depression,” as it was called then. An estimated one-fourth of those belonged to the latter category, exhibiting alternating episodes of both depression and mania. Today, after a dizzying variety of psych medications have been made available, a staggering 1.4 million Americans are receiving SSDI or SSI disability payments for these conditions.

 

Note this is not just an epidemic of overdiagnosis, although no doubt that is occurring as well. We’re not talking about the number of people labeled bipolar – we’re talking about the number of people who are disabled by that condition.

 

The explosion of bipolar disorder is clearly related to the use of psychotropic drugs. As far back as 1993, the American Psychiatric Association acknowledged that “All antidepressant treatments, including ECT, may provoke manic or hypomanic episodes.” A survey of the members of the Depressive and Manic Depressive Association found that 60% of them became bipolar after being diagnosed with depression.

 

Moreover, in the pre-psych meds era, manic-depression was largely a self-limiting condition. The majority of people with this condition had only one episode. Few had more than three, with long symptom-free periods in between. Something like 70-90% of them returned to their former social roles as parents, spouses, workers, homemakers.

 

Today, while the number of people disabled by bipolar disorder has skyrocketed, their long-term outcome has gotten almost immeasurably worse. Today doctors are seeing more and more rapid cycling between depression and mania, slower recovery, shorter symptom-free episodes, and progressive long-term decline. In the pre-psych meds era, one of the hallmarks of manic-depression was that patients’ cognitive abilities remained intact. Today, bipolar patients are exhibiting the same long-term cognitive decline characteristic of patients with schizophrenia – the most severe form of mental illness there is. Today only about one-third or fewer bipolar patients return to their former social roles. A study of bipolar patients found their social lives were nearly as impoverished as those with schizophrenia.

 

The convergence in outcomes between schizophrenic and bipolar patients began at the same time the members of both groups began to be treated with the same “drug cocktails,” often including so-called “antipsychotic” drugs. Well-documented side effects of these include not just cognitive decline but also cardiovascular problems, diabetes, obesity, and thyroid dysfunction – all of which are now plaguing bipolar patients.

 

All this led Harvard psychiatrists Huxley and Baldessarini to comment:

 

Prognosis for bipolar disorder was once considered relatively favorable, but contemporary findings suggest that disability and poor outcomes are prevalent, despite major therapeutic advances.

 

Advances???

 

The epidemic has even spread to children. In the pre-psych meds era, bipolar disorder was diagnosed in children so rarely that most clinicians believed that juvenile bipolar disorder simply did not exist. Today estimates of the number of children suffering from this disorder are as high as one out of fifty.

 

Whitaker details the history of this epidemic, as well. In the 1970’s, doctors began prescribing Ritalin to large number of children labeled “hyperactive,” children who, in previous decades, might have been considered merely “naughty” or “fidgety.” (No other nation in the world does this, by the way – certainly not on the scale we do. The United States, with less than five percent of the world’s population, accounts for a staggering 75% of the stimulants consumed by children.) Ritalin is a drug similar to amphetamines in its chemical structure and to cocaine in its mode of action. Mania and psychotic symptoms were already well-known side effects of both cocaine and amphetamines.

 

In 1976, an article appeared in the American Journal of Diseases of Childhood describing five children suffering from this hitherto unheard-of condition. Three of the five had been treated with either Ritalin or antidepressants. Two years later, another article appeared, documenting bipolar disorder in nine children, seven of whom had been previously treated with psych meds. In 1982, Strober and Carlsson reported that twelve of sixty adolescents treated with antidepressants became bipolar. Instead of concluding that antidepressants caused their illness, they argued, bizarrely, that the antidepressants had merely unmasked a pre-existing condition. 

 

This “unmasking” proceeded apace. The late 1980’s and the 1990’s saw an explosion in the number of prescriptions for stimulants and antidepressants given to children, and along with that was an explosion in the number of angry, out-of-control children admitted to hospital psychiatric wards.

 

Just how big is this epidemic? Whitaker provides us with some sobering figures. Doctor Joseph Biederman of Harvard Medical College and Massachusetts General Hospital reported that after four years, 12% of children treated for Attention-Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder displayed symptoms of bipolar disorder that were not present when the initial diagnosis of ADHD was made. Today an estimated 3.5 million children are being given stimulants for ADHD. Assuming 12% of them become bipolar, that’s four hundred and fifty thousand bipolar youth.

 

It gets worse. Barbara Gellar of the University of Washington found that nearly half of prepubertal children treated for depression had become bipolar during a ten-year follow-up period. Since 2 million children currently are being treated with SSRI’s for depression, this works out to something like one million bipolar youth.

 

In 2008, the General Accounting Office reported that over 600,000 young adults between 18 and 26 were suffering from bipolar disorder. This figure was surely a lowball estimate, since it didn’t include young people who were homeless, incarcerated, or institutionalized.

 

This is not about curing mental illness. It’s about creating mental illness, on an industrial scale.

 

We have already noted that the long-term prognosis for bipolar adults had gotten almost unimaginably worse since psych meds were introduced. The outlook for this new, iatrogenically manufactured juvenile bipolar disorder is similarly grim. One study found that 87% of juvenile bipolar cases exhibited “ultra-rapid cycling,” switching constantly back and forth between mania and depression.

 

In a previous post, I mentioned how the aforementioned Joseph Biederman oversaw the creation at Mass General of the Center for Pediatric Psychopathology, which he described as a “strategic collaboration” that would “move forward the commercial goals of J & J.” The purpose of the center was to develop screening tests for juvenile bipolar disorder and “alert physicians to the existence of a large group of children who might benefit from treatment with Risperidal,” which is marketed by J & J.

 

Biederman stated that that “[P]ediatric mania evolves into what some have called mixed or atypical mania in adulthood, [which] will provide further support for chronic use of Risperidal from childhood through adulthood.”

 

Oh, by the way, since the publication of Anatomy of an Epidemic, a review paper in CNS Neurosciences and Therapeutics appeared which noted that atypical antipsychotics, the class of drugs to which Risperidal belongs, increase the rate of suicide in bipolar patients.

 

Where do we go from here? Bipolar disorder was once a largely self-limiting condition.  However, it remains to be seen whether this new iatrogenically created version is as well. For some reason, the drug companies don’t seem very interested in funding research on this matter. But at the very least, we ought to stop manufacturing new cases. When you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging.

















Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I thank fellow OS’er Kate O’hehir for drawing my attention to that article in CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics that showed that medications that are commonly prescribed for bipolar disorder increase the rate of suicide in those patients. I notice the abstract makes no mention of this. Why do you suppose that is? Do you think maybe they were hoping most people would read only the abstract, instead of shelling out thirty-five dollars for the privilege of reading the entire article online?
When I read the literature on bipolar disorder, I have to laugh at some of the attempts to tiptoe around the elephant in the room. That paper by Huxley and Baldessarini states, “Functional outcome among treated bipolar (manic-depressive disorder) BDP patients was long thought to be favorable in this supposedly treatment-responsive favorable-prognosis disorder.” Well, why did psychiatrists in the pre-psych meds era think that? Because they were dummies? Or because the prognosis WAS favorable, before the advent of psychotropic “medicines?”
I could write a whole essay, and maybe I will, about this Biederman character. The guy is a medical megalomaniac on a par with Walter Freeman or John Money.
As always, I welcome comments from people who have taken/are taking these drugs. How did that work out for you? Have you ever considered how your life may have turned out differently if you had been offered a less drug-centric approach? What if you had been offered a sympathetic listener, and time to rest and heal without drugs? Or even what if, after your condition had been stabilized with drugs, they had then attempted to wean you off them as soon as possible? Thanks in advance for reading and commenting.
Patrick- excellent post. I've been pissed about how children and adults are routinely diagnosed with bipolar when they probably have anxiety/depression from PTSD or are too stressed out by modern life and the constant activity. Are all these people mentally ill or is our way of life crazy? Mental illness is an organic, real thing for some people, and it usually has a genetic underpinning. These folks respond very well to medication because they really have a medical problem. But millions of people with bipolar? I don't believe it either. What we need is government research not done for a profit. Where's the quality control?
Great stuff ! it is interesting that people can be convinced they are truly and incurably ill - as friends, family, physician and drug companies unite to take away an hope of "normalicy" they might have for themselves.
It is also interesting that the costs of creating tens of thousands of mentally ill people is partially responsible for fracturing our health care system.

As a kid we learned "lilly the pink" and learned it well - that and Kesey freed us from putting any stock in what any university educated drug pusher would have to say-
Great series Patrick. We used to call kids approaching puberty and in their teens "moody" and wait until their mood passed. Some kids and adults are very sensitive, they may get their feelings hurt, get angry or frustrated more easily. This is not a disorder, it's a personality trait. I've also noticed kids don't have firm routines or sleep as much as they should and it leads to confusion and crankiness.

I shudder when I watch insensitive parents raise a sensitive child. Even when they love the child they're often unable to understand someone who feels differently, it never turns out well. Now we can just drug them into numbness instead of helping them learn ways to cope. Such a pity, such a waste of young lives.
As a general comment, it seems to me that much of the beahvior that falls under the rubric of "bipolar disorder" used to be called "sowing one's wild oats." But that's how they get you in the door -- by pathologizing behaviors that used to be considered part of the normal range of human experience. Then begins the cascade of more drugs, stronger drugs, higher doses. It seems to me it's a lot easier to check into that particular hotel than to check out.
As another general comment, I'll mention that some commentors in the past have taken me to task because I do not have a medical degree.That is correct. My background is in zoology, and it is perfectly obvious to me that living things evolved to function, and to function very well. (For a time -- then we evolved to senesce and die and get the Hell out of the way of the next generation, but that's a topic for another essay, another day.) Telling me that one out of eight of us is suffering from a "biochemical imbalance in the brain" and needs to take pills for it is as ludicrous as telling me that there is a winged horse in the backyard. I don't need to look out the window to know that that can't possibly be true.

Thanks to all for reading and commenting.
Very enlightening article. I was offered drugs by my GP after some life events and health events had me mildly depressed, Wellbutrin made me edgy and testy, and another one (can't think of the name) had me seeing things in the woods on my walks that weren't there, I eventually came through without anything after deciding I wasn't depressed enough to need anything with those side effects. But the availability was rather astonishing from a GP no less.
Rita: that's exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about. That's how they get people in the door -- by pathologizing conditions that used to be considered part of the normal human experience. Glad you found your way out again, and thanks for reading and commenting. Be well.
You are providing a great service and resource for the readers here--many of whom are parents. Keep up the good work!
i orderd the book - and then looked at my phone to see a buddy of mine sending me quote after quote from the bible. I have tried for several years to get him to take a history class, or any damn class - but bad medicine and worse family have combined to limit his social activites to AA meetings. He is a perfect example of what you write. Now fiftytwo, he has spent thirty years of his life trapped in a diagnosis. He was the biggest, baddest, smartest, and youngest member of a tough family - and they, with the help of modern medicine, have all but killed him.
Snowden:

That story sounds like it deserves a post of its own.

Thanks to both of you for reading and commenting.
I have to read this again...This is very interesting. I have anecdotal-ly heard of more children being diagnosed with Bi-polar disorder. I have had very close friends as a child and young adult with the diagnoses and yet.in retrospect...I wonder if the diagnoses were wrong. So many of the "symptoms" overlap with other disorders ADD, Anxiety etc.
I can see your point Patrick, however. Do you have any one in your family with serious psychosis? I do. Untreated schizophrenia is also disabling, a person may be drug-free, but have a quality of life that is O, and abuse other people.
I personally have Major Depression and OCD. I tried for years to manage it on my own, I was really suffereing. Drugs were a Godsend, the illnesses are 80% controlled and drugs have brought me much more happiness. Almost no one likes to take medication. But one always has to weigh the risks vs. benefits.
Hi Kathy,

Thanks for stopping by. I'm always interested in hearing from people who have first-hand experience with these drugs.
Kathy:

I’ve thought some more about what you said. No, I have never known a family member who has suffered from psychosis. I have had family members who have made themselves and/or those around them miserable through wrath, envy, pride, and gluttony. I don’t see it adds anything to our understanding to label any of these individuals as having bipolar disorder or borderline personality disorder or narcissistic personality disorder or eating disorder.

Psychosis and bipolar disorder are obviously serious problems. I've never said otherwise. It does not follow that taking pills for any of these conditions will help matters. If Whitaker is right (and I think he makes an overwhelming case) that these pills are making these problems worse, well, I’d say that’s cause for alarm. Why not get the book and decide for yourself?

You mentioned you have a family member who suffers from psychosis. I think you would be interested in learning about the success psychiatrists in Finland have had with treating psychosis with something called Open Dialogue Therapy, a gentle client-centered approach in which the use of psychoactive drugs is kept to an absolute minimum. Also, there was an article in the New York Times on 3 October which noted that even severe schizophrenics can be helped with one hour a week of talk therapy. It takes time – as long as eighteen months, but that’s gotta be a bargain compared to pills which can lead to life-long disability. I hope your relative gets the help he needs. Cheers.