<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marion Stein's Open Salon Blog</title><description>Marion's Open Salon Blog</description><link>http://open.salon.com/user.php?uid=22011</link><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:05:15 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>5 Steps Amazon Could Take to Improve Reader Experience</title><description>

&lt;p&gt;The quality or lack thereof in self-published e-books has been the  topic of many a forum thread over at the Amazon sites, and many other  places on the web. Customers have complained about lack of editing, and  general shoddy quality, including bad formatting.  When anyone can  &amp;ldquo;publish&amp;rdquo; a &amp;ldquo;book&amp;rdquo; on Amazon&amp;rsquo;s free digital publishing platform, many  bad books will be published, leading most readers to avoid anything that  smells self-published &amp;ndash; even when the download is free. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here are five simple steps Amazon could take to improve reader experience with self-published works:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ol&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;5.    Stop allowing uploads to the 	Kindle platform using Word&lt;/strong&gt;.   Word is buggy and formatting errors 	are likely to occur. Most savvy  writers are uploading from HTML. 	Allowing Word uploads is &lt;em&gt;asking &lt;/em&gt;for  formatting problems. It&amp;rsquo;s not 	too much of a hurdle for writers to  convert to HTML, or read a 	formatting guide explaining how to do this.   Writers who lack the 	technical &amp;ldquo;expertise&amp;rdquo; can easily find someone (a  grandchild 	perhaps) who can figure it out.&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;4.  Format Check&lt;/strong&gt;. Related to 	above &amp;ndash; Have a program that reviews  &lt;em&gt;formatting&lt;/em&gt;  and 	automatically stops badly formatted work from being accepted for 	 publication. It only needs to be sophisticated enough to 	differentiate  purposeful playfulness from complete messes, including 	scans supplied  by rip-off vanity presses like Publish America and Author House.&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;(In fact Amazon needs to  crack down on companies like &lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/17/publish-america-scam_n_929591.html"&gt;Publish America&lt;/a&gt;  which  publish unproofed and badly formatted manuscripts on Kindle and  then charge their authors for &amp;ldquo;corrections&amp;rdquo; and to get back their  publication rights. These practices don&amp;rsquo;t simply rip-off authors, they  leave Amazon customers unsatisfied, and may turn off customers.)&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;3. Use an advanced spelling and grammar check.&lt;/strong&gt; Sure  one would imagine that any manuscript being uploaded has been proofread  a number of times, and that&amp;nbsp; all manuscripts have been through simple  automated checks. However, this is not always the case. Amazon is now  experimenting with a spell check  that gives the author feedback about  possible errors after they submit a manuscript to 	Amazon&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;preview&amp;rdquo;  feature. This may help, but I&amp;rsquo;m not sure how good it is at spotting  wrong words, grammar issues, punctuation 	problems, and other technical  errors.   Nor will &lt;em&gt;any&lt;/em&gt; automated system work on fiction where  authors may purposely use 	phonetic spelling or bad grammar in dialogue  or for other purposes &amp;ndash; not to mention sci-fi and fantasy where entire  new languages may be created. However, Amazon should continue to develop  the feature, and &lt;em&gt;require&lt;/em&gt; publishers (whether they are  micro-presses or individuals) to &amp;ldquo;sign-off&amp;rdquo; that they have actually  viewed the 	feedback, and anything being left uncorrected is  intentional.&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;2. Book length and pricing:&lt;/strong&gt; Right now any length is  acceptable for a Kindle book, and many 	bestselling Kindle books would  be too short to sell in print as a stand alone book. Recently, many  authors have begun uploading single short 	stories, including  short-shorts.  Nothing wrong with that, except they&amp;rsquo;re mixed in with  full-length books by genre, leading to some 	consumers feeling &amp;ldquo;ripped  off&amp;rdquo; when they discover they&amp;rsquo;ve just 	purchased a 1,000 word work.  Amazon has introduced a &amp;ldquo;page 	count&amp;rdquo; feature for e-books to help make  consumers more aware of 	what they are getting.  That&amp;rsquo;s great. However,  the 	flood of short works still makes it difficult to sift through if  you are looking to buy something that takes more than an hour to read.  Here&amp;rsquo;s a simple suggestion &amp;ndash; novels and even novellas 	and short story  collections of at least 20,000 words are books. Anything less than that  is a mini-book, or a short, or a single or whatever you want to call it,  and should be somehow separated from 	full-length works, and clearly  labeled. Price limits on shorts would be a good thing. Amazon prices its  own &amp;ldquo;singles&amp;rdquo; imprint at less than full-length book prices, so why  shouldn&amp;rsquo;t 	independent authors be subject to these controls?&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;1. Help consumers find quality self-published work that will appeal to them. &lt;/strong&gt;Amazon  already has many proprietary secrets for targeting products to  customers. They also have started several of their own imprints to help  promising work get attention. But with so many books being uploaded  every day, more filters are needed. A couple of months ago, I &lt;a href="http://www.marionstein.net/2013/03/08/the-service-savvy-authors-would-pay-for-if-it-existed/"&gt;wrote a post&lt;/a&gt;  on how Amazon could use paid readers to find self-published work likely  to appeal to target audiences. The short version is that Amazon should  offer an option for writers willing to pay a reading fee. The reader  should be a consumer who falls into the target audience for the book.  The writers would have receive a genuine reader review, and the reader  could either &amp;ldquo;approve&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;reject&amp;rdquo; the book. Amazon would have a browse  feature for approved books, and might promote them in other ways.&amp;nbsp;  (Rejected books could still be self-published without &amp;ldquo;approval.&amp;rdquo;) This  would give self-published authors a legitimate, objective review at a  lower price than&lt;em&gt; Kirkus&lt;/em&gt; or other services charge. It would be  more relevant to Amazon readers since the reviewer would be one of their  own and not a paid review service. It would help readers find books  they are more likely to enjoy.&lt;/ol&gt;

</description><link>http://open.salon.com/blog/marioninnyc/2013/05/20/5_steps_amazon_could_take_to_improve_reader_experience</link><guid>http://open.salon.com/blog/marioninnyc/2013/05/20/5_steps_amazon_could_take_to_improve_reader_experience</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:05:54 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The Office -- Escape from Scranton</title><description>

&lt;p&gt;When the American version of &lt;em&gt;The Office&lt;/em&gt; first appeared, it was  condescending in a Hollywood way, written by people who may have once,  briefly, worked in a setting similar to Dunder-Mifflin, but always  believed they were destined for better things, and got the hell out as  soon as they could.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Over time, however, it became habit-forming. Steve Carrell made  Michael Scott's need to be loved idiosyncratic, terribly funny and  somehow a reflection of everyone's inner-narcissist. Contrary to rumor,  he was not the terrible boss we've all had. He might have shared some  traits with bad bosses, but most truly horrific employers want to be  feared, not loved. There was also, of course, Jim. From the beginning  Jim, and to a lesser extent his beloved Pam, were our surrogates. They  were young.&amp;nbsp;  They were not weird. They were more than their jobs, and  they fell in love. Communication was not great. It took Pam a while to  see what should have been obvious.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Other characters also developed into full-fledged human beings  although it took some longer than others. Angela, the office mean girl,  needed to be taken down a few dozen pegs before we could consider liking  her.  As for Oscar, if I'm not mistaken, until the last couple of  seasons, he seemed mostly to be there as two-fer, and to make Michael's  jokes that much more embarrassing.  Dwight remained eccentric, but  matured.  Andy's arc was the strangest. He started out as a nice guy.  His pursuit of Erin showed an obsessive side, but we didn't recognize it  for what it was -- the first sign of an impending mid-life crisis. He  turned into a spoiled, pathetic, attention-whore, whose goal was fame.  So in the finale, thanks to a viral video, he got what he wanted in the  most humiliating way possible, but then managed to redeem himself and  find his dream job because in America there are &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; second acts.  If there was a message, it was this: humiliation and suffering builds character.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But back to Jim and Pam.  When they showed Krasinski's audition in  the retrospective, it was clear he had them at &amp;ldquo;pomegranates.&amp;rdquo;  Steve  Carrell might have been the bigger name, but Krasinski was the star in  every way that counted.  It took Jim way too long to leave and go on to  bigger and better things.  They gave Pam the thankless task of trying to  stop him. She was the future Mary Bailey secretly praying George would  not leave town, but stay in Bedford Falls and someday live with her in  that big old house. It was easy to imagine Pam's frustration, and Jenna  Fisher is a good enough actor for us to see what wasn't in the script.  It wasn't just fear, but pragmatism and a little bit of selfishness. Two  parents, who never work overtime, are better than one who's never home,  at least for the one who is. Finding a new job and decent childcare is  hard, and not having easy access to the grandparents makes it rougher.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Still, when the "buy-out road trip" came up and Jim decided not to do  it because nothing was as important as his family, we all felt his  decision was killing him.  Watching him regress to his prankster role,  with Pam as his collaborator, made us wonder how long the charade would  last.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So when Pam finally did the right thing and sold the house, so that she and Jim could &lt;a href="http://slangcity.com/movie_quote/its_a_wonderful_life.htm"&gt;shake the dust of that crummy little town &lt;/a&gt;off their feet, we could only applaud.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The end of &lt;em&gt;The Office&lt;/em&gt; was just like the end of &lt;em&gt;It's A Wonderful Life&lt;/em&gt;, if George Bailey had finally gotten the hell out of Bedford Falls.&lt;/p&gt;

</description><link>http://open.salon.com/blog/marioninnyc/2013/05/18/the_office_--_escape_from_scranton</link><guid>http://open.salon.com/blog/marioninnyc/2013/05/18/the_office_--_escape_from_scranton</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 12:05:37 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Why Modern Family is the Bestest Sit Com and a Fake</title><description>

&lt;div&gt; 					   						Watching the most recent episode of &lt;em&gt;Modern Family&lt;/em&gt;,  I laughed out loud, smiled, and by the end found myself on the verge of weepy. None of which was an unusual reaction. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So my question is, if this show is so good, why does it always feel like a guilty pleasure?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Using humor to undermine sentiment, almost every episode involves some  essential lesson. The plot, last night,  as always,  involved several  threads woven neatly by the end into one theme. There&amp;rsquo;s art to it for  sure, and it&amp;rsquo;s never  clear until the last minutes what exactly we are  supposed to take away.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Manny has to write a composition about a family member who is a  &amp;ldquo;hero.&amp;rdquo; Seeing the various petty acts of passive and not so  passive-aggression, ethical transgressions, etc. on the part of his  parents, and other members of the tribe, it&amp;rsquo;s a hard call, and he  methodically crosses each offender off a list (&lt;em&gt;literally&lt;/em&gt;, a list on a note-pad).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Meantime, Claire, still in need of something to do besides run her  household, is offered a job by Jay, who having recently sacked his  number two, is looking for someone who could maybe take over the  business, but Claire having had a bad experience working for her father  in the past, wants to avoid the whole topic.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In another ring of the family circus, Cam and Mitch run into Teddy,  Mitch&amp;rsquo;s ex, a pediatrician. Dr. Teddy invites them to a fundraiser at a  roller rink on Saturday. Cam, who has never met Teddy before, accepts.  Mitch worries that Cam will be uncomfortable around his ex, but Cam  insists he&amp;rsquo;s fine with it. That is, until Saturday comes and the  entire  Pritchard and Dunphy clan show up at the rink. It turns out Teddy is  still the Dunphy&amp;rsquo;s pediatrician, and Phil is his real estate agent. He&amp;rsquo;s  been golfing with Jay who seems to enjoy an easy rapport with him than  he&amp;rsquo;s ever had with Cam. Everybody loves Teddy, even Lilly and Gloria  who&amp;rsquo;ve  just met him.  So Cam is, of course, crushed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Also at the rink:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Haley and Alex try to flirt with two cute boys, and Alex is clueless.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt; Gloria admits she can&amp;rsquo;t skate and doesn&amp;rsquo;t want to look like an idiot, so puppy-dog Phil, tries to teach her.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt; Claire confronts her father and faces his disappointment.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This being &lt;em&gt;Modern Family&lt;/em&gt; and not &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; life, we aren&amp;rsquo;t left with future traumatic memories and bad feelings. Instead, in the last few minutes everything is resolved:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Alex will not look back on another incident on her road to having  twenty cats. Social genius Haley teaches book-smart Alex a valuable  lesson about interacting with people, and Alex has a realization that  maybe Haley isn&amp;rsquo;t so dumb.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt; Phil will make a noble sacrifice, in order for Gloria to have a chance to skate without feeling like she&amp;rsquo;s on display.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt; Claire sees Jay do something that shows he&amp;rsquo;s grown and changed, so she decides to take the job after all.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And what magical thing does Jay do that gets Claire to change her  mind? The patriarch sits down with Cam and casually starts talking about  what a great guy Teddy is, but how he&amp;rsquo;s still not in a successful  relationship, and that says something, and Jay never thought he was good  for Mitch &amp;ndash;&amp;nbsp; that he didn&amp;rsquo;t &amp;ldquo;bring out the best in him,&amp;rdquo; the way Cam  does and always has. Cam lights up.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Manny writes his essay about how his entire family are heros because  of &amp;ldquo;the way we are together.&amp;rdquo; He gets a C+ because the teacher says it  was &amp;ldquo;not the assignment.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;So here&amp;rsquo;s the deal, we love &lt;em&gt;Modern Family&lt;/em&gt; because all the  characters are both &amp;ldquo;types&amp;rdquo; that exist in our own families (no matter  what are ethnicity, social class, orientation, etc), and they are also  well-developed as individuals, and brought to life by an amazing cast.  Because it so easy for us to identify with them to think they are like  us, we are also lulled into believing for a moment that our families are  just like this too.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The thing is, it&amp;rsquo;s no more realistic than &lt;em&gt;I Love Lucy&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;The Brady Bunch&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Even if your father-in-law (for whose respect you desperately long)  does believe you were the best possible thing that could happen to his  son, chances are he&amp;rsquo;ll never tell you.  Even if your father has changed  from the last time you briefly worked for him, the two of you will  revert to old patterns and get stuck in your past dynamic because that&amp;rsquo;s  how real families operate.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Once upon a time people watched Fred Astaire on the silver screen and  would believe for a moment in the dark that they too could dance like  that &amp;ndash; or at least forget they couldn&amp;rsquo;t &amp;ndash;  because he made it look so  effortless. For thirty minutes (including commercials) every week, we  can forget what happened last Thanksgiving, and believe in the heroism  of &amp;ldquo;how we are together.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;(Like this post? Please feel free to tweet about it or leave a  comment. Have a look around. There&amp;rsquo;s more to like, and by all means take  a look at &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Marion-Stein/e/B00404HWN0/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1"&gt;this.&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;

</description><link>http://open.salon.com/blog/marioninnyc/2013/05/09/why_modern_family_is_the_bestest_sit_com_and_a_fake</link><guid>http://open.salon.com/blog/marioninnyc/2013/05/09/why_modern_family_is_the_bestest_sit_com_and_a_fake</guid><pubDate>Thu, 9 May 2013 12:05:46 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Dumbest NY Times Column of the Year</title><description>

&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/05/opinion/sunday/bruni-sexismand-the-single-murderess.html"&gt;column&lt;/a&gt; that manages to be sensationalistic, disjointed &lt;em&gt;and &lt;/em&gt;incoherent,  Frank Bruni discovers the shocking information that there seems to be a  double-standard for women and men when it comes to sexual activity. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He writes about the Amanda Knox case and how her perceived  licentiousness led to worldwide fascination and a murder conviction. Not  like anyone hasn&amp;rsquo;t written about this before, but whatever. However,  Bruni doesn&amp;rsquo;t have much to say about details of Knox&amp;rsquo;s case, such as  Knox&amp;rsquo;s  &amp;ldquo;confession&amp;rdquo; made after hours of coercion. In that statement,  she  named a popular club owner as a co-conspirator, even though  it  turned out he couldn&amp;rsquo;t possibly have been involved.  It should have been  obvious the confession was false because it didn&amp;rsquo;t fit the the facts,  but as with many such cases &amp;ndash; the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Central_Park_Five"&gt;Central Park Five,&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Tankleff"&gt;Marty Tankleff&lt;/a&gt;, to name two, once someone admits to something, that&amp;rsquo;s very powerful. We are only now beginning to understand that &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_confession"&gt;&lt;em&gt;false &lt;/em&gt;confession &lt;/a&gt;is a &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; thing, and that young people who have little experience with the criminal justice system are the most vulnerable.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In Knox&amp;rsquo;s case, the police made an early assumption of guilt, and  they stuck to their guns even when it became more and more obvious that  the murderer, Rudy Guede, had acted alone, raping and killing the victim  after breaking in &lt;em&gt;when no one else was home&lt;/em&gt;.  Knox&amp;rsquo;s sexuality  and foreignness&amp;nbsp; might have set things in motion, but ultimately the  case was what typically happens when cops rush to judgement and a  vulnerable suspect confesses.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Bruni doesn&amp;rsquo;t write about that. Instead he quotes from a 2011 article  in a British tabloid about where Knox stored her vibrator, and then  states: &amp;ldquo;&lt;em&gt;We&amp;rsquo;ll never know what happened on the night &amp;hellip; Meredith Kercher was killed.&amp;rdquo; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;No, Frank, the reality is we have a pretty good idea of what happened  based on&amp;nbsp; DNA,&amp;nbsp; timelines, witness statements, etc.&amp;nbsp; Knox and her  boyfriend were not there. Knox came back the next day and it took her a  while to figure out something was wrong. When she did, she called her  boyfriend, and he called his sister a police officer before finally  calling the police.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Bruni ignores Knox&amp;rsquo;s exoneration because it&amp;rsquo;s not the point he&amp;rsquo;s trying to make, even though it actually is. It &lt;em&gt;was&lt;/em&gt;  her behavior that led to the rush to judgement, and her sexuality  became part of the theory of the crime.  The &amp;ldquo;evidence&amp;rdquo; was made to fit  the theory.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He goes on to write about the Jody Arias case.  But other than &amp;ldquo;sex  sells&amp;rdquo;, the two cases have nothing in common. Knox was absolved on  appeal because the court found no credible evidence against her and the  theory that she, Guede and her boyfriend had conspired was not  probable.&amp;nbsp; Now they&amp;rsquo;re going after her again, based on nothing.   In  contrast, Arias really killed someone. She tried to cover it up, was  caught, and made a convoluted claim of self-defense, which defies both  common sense and the EVIDENCE.  A jury is currently deliberating. Arias&amp;rsquo;  attractiveness and the salacious details of the case may sell papers,  but they are not why she was arrested, or why she is likely to be  convicted. She&amp;rsquo;s likely to be convicted because there&amp;rsquo;s a plethora of  evidence that she&amp;rsquo;s guilty.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;But instead of writing about any of that Bruni draws a false  comparison between Knox and Arias and states,&amp;nbsp; &amp;ldquo;Similar questions can be  asked&amp;hellip;&amp;rdquo;  &lt;em&gt;Really?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Bruni then moves from murder to scandal and politics, writing, &amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;ve  heard quite a bit lately about David Petraeus&amp;rsquo; road to redemption, less  about Paula Broadwell&amp;rsquo;s.&amp;rdquo; &lt;em&gt;Well, yeah. &lt;/em&gt;Petraeus was the director  of the CIA, and Broadwell an unemployed graduate student. If there was  more attention being paid to her, wouldn&amp;rsquo;t that &lt;em&gt;strengthen&lt;/em&gt; Bruni&amp;rsquo;s point? If he has one?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He then goes on to make the claim that if Anthony Weiner had been  &amp;ldquo;Antonia&amp;rdquo; she couldn&amp;rsquo;t possibly make a political come back, and he also  wonders about the political fates of &amp;ldquo;Marcia Sanford,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;Newtina  Gingrich,&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;Wilhelmina Clinton.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I get it.  he wants to write a column about the existing  double-standard for politicians and other public figures, and because  it&amp;rsquo;s so obvious and dull,&amp;nbsp; he needs to come up with an angle, so he  sexes it up with Amanda Knox and Jody Arias.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;He&amp;rsquo;s writing about how Knox&amp;rsquo;s sexuality was exploited by the media  and then he exploits Knox&amp;rsquo;s sexuality to write his column.&amp;nbsp; Maybe he&amp;rsquo;s  not so dumb after all.&lt;/p&gt;

</description><link>http://open.salon.com/blog/marioninnyc/2013/05/05/dumbest_ny_times_column_of_the_year</link><guid>http://open.salon.com/blog/marioninnyc/2013/05/05/dumbest_ny_times_column_of_the_year</guid><pubDate>Sun, 5 May 2013 14:05:35 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Smash - Opening Night - Now Sucking Slightly Less</title><description>

&lt;p&gt;Ezra Pound?????  &lt;em&gt;The musical? &lt;/em&gt; Was that supposed to be an  inside joke between Julia and Tom, and maybe the deadpan delivery got in  the way?  Or, is this show really being written by idiots who just  filled in Ezra Pound having no idea about &lt;a href="http://poetry.about.com/od/oq/p/Ezra-Pound.htm"&gt;all the crazy fascist stuff&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is my first post on the show in about 3 weeks because while I  was still continuing my vigil, there was not much new to report.   Generally, the level of terribleness has lessened. That doesn&amp;rsquo;t mean  it&amp;rsquo;s good.  A season highlight came a couple of  weeks back with the  perfect song, &lt;em&gt;Let&amp;rsquo;s Start Tomorrow Tonight&lt;/em&gt;, which sounded like a  classic from some late studio-era musical, but then they ruined the  aftermath, arguing that it didn&amp;rsquo;t belong in the show and used it for the  whole predictable &lt;em&gt;Tom-is-now-losing-his-humanity&lt;/em&gt; storyline. You&amp;rsquo;ve got a song like that, you either find a place for it in  your show or you write another show real quick. &lt;em&gt;For Sam&lt;/em&gt;. Also you&amp;rsquo;ve got a boyfriend like Sam, you try a lot harder to keep him around and not be an asshole.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Then there was the one with the over-the-top obviously high Liza Minelli impersonator.  Wait a second that &lt;em&gt;wasn&amp;rsquo;t&lt;/em&gt; an impersonator?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Nice meta-reference, Ivy calling Karen, &amp;ldquo;magic Karen.&amp;rdquo;  The writers  must be reading the forums. And I&amp;rsquo;ll admit relief that they let Ivy  finally dumped Derek in the most perfect way possible. Let&amp;rsquo;s hope it  sticks.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Was that the same Leo? I still hate Leo.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Angelica Houston&amp;rsquo;s one and only good moment was last season singing &lt;em&gt;September Song&lt;/em&gt;.   She&amp;rsquo;s not a good singer, but it was the most human we&amp;rsquo;ve seen her, and  the most moving. Houston not only really doesn&amp;rsquo;t look good as Eileen,  she doesn&amp;rsquo;t act good. She&amp;rsquo;s not playing a person, she&amp;rsquo;s playing an  attitude, and not well.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The Julia and Tom partner stuff is dull and predictable. What happens  next week? My money&amp;rsquo;s on Julia tearfully apologizing to Tom for being  such a selfish shrew. It&amp;rsquo;s&amp;nbsp; all going to work out in the end, probably  with Grace continuing to date and work with Detective Ed Green, because  work and romance go so well together,&amp;nbsp; and maybe Jimmy and Kyle too.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I hate Jimmy, but geez how big is the stick up Karen&amp;rsquo;s ass? Jimmy has  plenty of issues for which he should probably be dumped. Current drug  use is&amp;nbsp; high on that list. Hitting his sleazy brother in order to  protect is loyal friend, is not. That&amp;rsquo;s a &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; thing.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Speaking of Karen&amp;rsquo;s big stick, there&amp;rsquo;s the Ana thing too. Ana is  perfectly justified in not speaking to Karen. Friends should be happy  when good things happen to friends. And if they are jealous and really  believe they are more &amp;ldquo;special&amp;rdquo; and deserve the good things more than  the friend does, they should keep it to themselves because that&amp;rsquo;s  manners &amp;mdash; which I thought people were supposed to have in whichever  flyover state Karen comes from.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Also, I get that in order to move on, Ivy needs to forgive Karen for  stealing the part Tom wrote with her in mind, being the object of her  boyfriend&amp;rsquo;s obsession, and demanding she be fired from even the ensemble  of &lt;em&gt;Bombshell&lt;/em&gt;, but does she have to sing with her? &lt;em&gt;Really? &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Tom eying sweet young Kyle was creepy. There was a hint of something  with that line about how they already knew each other, but we keep  seeing Kyle sucking face with the age-appropriate lighting guy from &lt;em&gt;Hit List&lt;/em&gt;,  and that makes a whole lot more sense. (I realize that in real life  there is &amp;ldquo;only&amp;rdquo; a thirteen year age difference between the actors, but  Andy Meintus looks barely legal and Christian Borle looks &lt;em&gt;mature&lt;/em&gt;.)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;There was one really good thing, about &lt;em&gt;Opening Night&lt;/em&gt; and that seeing and hearing Miss Ivy Lynn aka Megan Hilty belting &lt;em&gt;Don&amp;rsquo;t Forget Me.&lt;/em&gt;  It finally clarified (a little bit) what we kept hearing about the &amp;ldquo;new  concept&amp;rdquo; for the show being about the men in Monroe&amp;rsquo;s life. More  importantly, thank God, it gave Ivy her moment and made it clear that  she is a star who can carry a show.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Per wikipedia there are three more episodes left, but honestly they  could have tied up all the loose ends with one more. The show&amp;rsquo;s already  been cancelled.&amp;nbsp; It&amp;rsquo;s a dead show airing. It might seem to be rallying,  but that often happens right before a patient succumbs to injuries, and &lt;em&gt;Smash&lt;/em&gt; had too many self-inflicted wounds to survive.&lt;/p&gt;

</description><link>http://open.salon.com/blog/marioninnyc/2013/04/21/smash_-_opening_night_-_now_sucking_slightly_less</link><guid>http://open.salon.com/blog/marioninnyc/2013/04/21/smash_-_opening_night_-_now_sucking_slightly_less</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 00:04:41 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>



