<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0"><channel><title>William Hazelgrove's Open Salon Blog</title><description>The View From Hemingway's Attic</description><link>http://open.salon.com/user.php?uid=99198</link><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:06:57 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Socializing makes you smarter</title><description>

&lt;div style="text-align: left"&gt;Now when you head out for a  beer with the boys or some champagne with the girls you now have a valid reason;  it makes you smarter. The NY Times just had an article discussing the merit of  going out to see a friend or a loved one or just about anybody who talks. They  have to talk. But if they talk then the research is that we wire up like crazy.  I have always suspected this. Whenever I go out and talk politics or culture or  anything I always feel a little&amp;nbsp;smarter than when I began. According to the  Times this is the perfect antidote to becoming the cyber moron who communicates  in texts. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Apparently we stimulate each other. Our speech patterns. Our  content. Just about everything to do with having a conversation gets our neurons  humming. Ever notice how dull you become when you don't see your friends? Ever  notice how one dimensional your thinking gets when all you do is work? Your  brain goes to sleep and slips into an autopilot mode. But if you head out on a  Wednesday night and meet a good friend then the next day you will be sharper,  brighter, more relaxed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's interesting how people devalue interaction.  Middle class people believing slogging it out will get them there but really you  can do nothing better than take a break. We are social creatures and our  sociability stimulates our brains and lights up all sorts of memories,  epiphanies, thoughts, insights. I find that many time I think of new stories  while having a conversation. This is because we find the hidden treasures by our  connections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So do it. Call someone. Go out. It will make you a lot  smarter.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: left"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: left"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.williamhazelgrove.com"&gt;www.williamhazelgrove.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="text-align: left"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Rocket-Man-William-Elliott-Hazelgrove/dp/1938467582/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1359822181&amp;amp;sr=1-4&amp;amp;keywords=rocket+man"&gt;Rocket  Man...the American Dream upside down &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

</description><link>http://open.salon.com/blog/william_elliott/2013/03/26/socializing_makes_you_smarter</link><guid>http://open.salon.com/blog/william_elliott/2013/03/26/socializing_makes_you_smarter</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:03:39 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Modern Dads spend more time with kids, but...</title><description>
&lt;div style="text-align: left"&gt;Alright. Dads are doing a lot  better. In 1965 they spend 2.5 hours a week with their kids. In 2011 they spend  7.3. A three hundred percent increase, but mothers still blow them away. A  whopping 13.5 hours. Twice of the dads. And here is the kicker, dads feel worse  about that 7.3 than their fathers did with their 2.5. In other words dads just  cant get a break while their wives feel pretty good about the time spent with  their children and their own dads didn't break a sweat about their provider  little kid time status.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I get it. I feel like I never spend enough time  with my kids and I work at&amp;nbsp; home. Of course you can be at home and not be at  home. But still I feel like I do not see my kids but&amp;nbsp; near enough and with one  son getting toward college I wonder...did I do enough? Was I a good dad? Who  doesn't have these thoughts right? And you have to envy those old dads who just  went off to work and plowed ahead and maybe they missed their kids but I'm not  so sure. If you don't open the box then maybe you never know what you are  missing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But we do. As a dad you are always rushing home to that kid  function. Missed kid activities are painful and you wonder about those traveling  dads. I knew a guy who traveled every week and I asked him about missing his  kids. He said if he thought about it it would kill him. So there is that. But  for most of us "around" dads you still feel like you are not doing enough. More  activities. More bonding moments. And then they grow up anyway. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It  breaks your heart. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Rocket-Man-William-Elliott-Hazelgrove/dp/1938467582/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1359822181&amp;amp;sr=1-4&amp;amp;keywords=rocket+man"&gt;Rocket  Man...the American Dream shouldn't be this hard &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://open.salon.com/blog/william_elliott/2013/03/14/modern_dads_spend_more_time_with_kids_but</link><guid>http://open.salon.com/blog/william_elliott/2013/03/14/modern_dads_spend_more_time_with_kids_but</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:03:03 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Starving the Beast</title><description>
&lt;div style="text-align: left"&gt;What is the sequester really  about you ask. Well, it is about Starving the Beast and destroying the second  term of President Obama. These are not intermingled except one will serve the  other. Historically the Beast is the government. The Beast has been fed since  FDRs New Deal. This is the first sin as far as Tea Party Republicans are  concerned. The Beast began to fatten up with&amp;nbsp; Social Security Medicare&amp;nbsp;Food  Stamps Medicaid the Department of Education, Energy, even the Department of the  Interior. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Ayn Rand is the Joan of Arc of the Starve the Beast  movement then certainly&amp;nbsp;FDR is the father of the beast. And so began the  struggle to keep feeding the Beast by one side and to starve it by the other. We  quickly devolved into Republicans and Democrats facing off in the classic  Hamiltonian Jefferson struggle: redistribution versus free enterprise. And so  like the Cold War we co-existed until...until the election of Barack Obama and  the rise of the Tea Party. And then a strategy emerged. A workable strategy.  Starve the Beast.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You do it by shutting down the government at every  opportunity and holding the President and basically the American people hostage.  Well, it has worked well. The sequester is one massive spending cut. The dream  of the Tea Party. Also it knocks down the President at the same time the Beast  gets bled and bled. The ultimate bleeding will be one of continued blocks during  the ongoing debt ceiling debates.&amp;nbsp;Add to this that no Republican can afford to  be to the left of the Tea Party without losing their seat in a Primary and you  have a perfect storm. Or a Democracy held hostage to an ideology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That  ideology is that Social Programs are inherently bad. Government is inherently  bad and it really should be every man for him or herself. The one percent or the  four hundred families that have more wealth than 150 millions people deserve  every nickel. In a strange turnabout our government is being led by a small  faction of ideologues in the House. So the Beast will be starved. FDR's baby  will be finally starved in his crib once and for all. President Obamas second  term will be sullied. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the American people are just hapless  bystanders.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.billhazelgrove.com/"&gt;www.billhazelgrove.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Rocket-Man-William-Elliott-Hazelgrove/dp/1938467582/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1359822181&amp;amp;sr=1-4&amp;amp;keywords=rocket+man"&gt;Rocket  Man..the Catcher in the Rye for the Great Recession &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://open.salon.com/blog/william_elliott/2013/03/13/starving_the_beast_1</link><guid>http://open.salon.com/blog/william_elliott/2013/03/13/starving_the_beast_1</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:03:47 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Starving the Beast</title><description>
&lt;div style="text-align: left"&gt;What is the sequester really  about you ask. Well, it is about Starving the Beast and destroying the second  term of President Obama. These are not intermingled except one will serve the  other. Historically the Beast is the government. The Beast has been fed since  FDRs New Deal. This is the first sin as far as Tea Party Republicans are  concerned. The Beast began to fatten up with&amp;nbsp; Social Security Medicare&amp;nbsp;Food  Stamps Medicaid the Department of Education, Energy, even the Department of the  Interior. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Ayn Rand is the Joan of Arc of the Starve the Beast  movement then certainly&amp;nbsp;FDR is the father of the beast. And so began the  struggle to keep feeding the Beast by one side and to starve it by the other. We  quickly devolved into Republicans and Democrats facing off in the classic  Hamiltonian Jefferson struggle: redistribution versus free enterprise. And so  like the Cold War we co-existed until...until the election of Barack Obama and  the rise of the Tea Party. And then a strategy emerged. A workable strategy.  Starve the Beast.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You do it by shutting down the government at every  opportunity and holding the President and basically the American people hostage.  Well, it has worked well. The sequester is one massive spending cut. The dream  of the Tea Party. Also it knocks down the President at the same time the Beast  gets bled and bled. The ultimate bleeding will be one of continued blocks during  the ongoing debt ceiling debates.&amp;nbsp;Add to this that no Republican can afford to  be to the left of the Tea Party without losing their seat in a Primary and you  have a perfect storm. Or a Democracy held hostage to an ideology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That  ideology is that Social Programs are inherently bad. Government is inherently  bad and it really should be every man for him or herself. The one percent or the  four hundred families that have more wealth than 150 millions people deserve  every nickel. In a strange turnabout our government is being led by a small  faction of ideologues in the House. So the Beast will be starved. FDR's baby  will be finally starved in his crib once and for all. President Obamas second  term will be sullied. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the American people are just hapless  bystanders.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.billhazelgrove.com/"&gt;www.billhazelgrove.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Rocket-Man-William-Elliott-Hazelgrove/dp/1938467582/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1359822181&amp;amp;sr=1-4&amp;amp;keywords=rocket+man"&gt;Rocket  Man..the Catcher in the Rye for the Great Recession &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://open.salon.com/blog/william_elliott/2013/03/13/starving_the_beast</link><guid>http://open.salon.com/blog/william_elliott/2013/03/13/starving_the_beast</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:03:34 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The American as it stands </title><description>
&lt;p&gt;Watch this video. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.upworthy.com/9-out-of-10-americans-are-completely-wrong-about-this-mind-blowing-fact-2"&gt;http://www.upworthy.com/9-out-of-10-Americans-are-completely-wrong-about-this-mind-blowing-fact-2&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok.  Now you know. And if you suspected you are working harder for less you are  right. The thesis of Rocket Man and every&amp;nbsp;novel dealing with the American Dream  is that it is really a phantom. Take Gatsby. Jay Gatsby had rightly figured out  that the American Dream was ultimately to be wealthy. Fabulously wealthy. And he  attained it but then he was literally crushed by the forces that be. The Tom  Buchannans. The one percent of his time. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gatsby had tried to crash the  gates and had been found wanting. He really didn't understand the forces against  him as we know now.&amp;nbsp;Income inequality. Even if you are doing fine you still have  to be staggered that &lt;em&gt;one percent of the population owns forty percent of the  wealth&lt;/em&gt;. Or twenty percent at the top owns&amp;nbsp;eighty nine&amp;nbsp;percent of the wealth  while the bottom eighty percent&amp;nbsp; (us) have 11 percent of the wealth! That is  what we divide up. Think about how about the fact that one percent owns fifty  percent of the stocks while the&amp;nbsp;middle class&amp;nbsp;own less than five percent. Think  about that. These numbers are staggering. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look around. People are  working longer and harder for less. They literally look unwell. People have aged  dramatically in the last ten years. Their clothes are older. Their cars are  older. These all point to the shrinking pie. What is it...four hundred families  own more wealth than one hundred and fifty million Americans! Clearly the  American Dream has become one of unloading before the next catastrophe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I  would say the&amp;nbsp;new American Dream is one of downsizing now. Not getting something  bigger, but something smaller. It is something unheard of in the march of our  country. It was always forward. Now it is one of trying to jettison property  before someone loses their job. The American Dream is now simply one of finding  something we lost along the way. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Rocket-Man-William-Elliott-Hazelgrove/dp/1938467582/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1359822181&amp;amp;sr=1-4&amp;amp;keywords=rocket+man"&gt;Rocket  Man...the American Dream upside down &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><link>http://open.salon.com/blog/william_elliott/2013/03/13/the_american_as_it_stands</link><guid>http://open.salon.com/blog/william_elliott/2013/03/13/the_american_as_it_stands</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:03:30 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>



